Greens are killing the planet

Your math doesn't work. If solar and wind now provide 5% of global energy, how could dependence on fossil fuels have only declined by 2%?

Because there are other sources besides solar, wind and fossil fuels?
Because solar and wind didn't produce 0% twenty years ago?

And you act as if 5% of global demand were trivial.

Compared to 84%, it seems trivial.
What other technologies do you believe are now providing 3% of the world's energy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top