Greatest Economy Ever at 1.9% GDP

View attachment 287495

Be Honest DOPers. We all know why the unemployment rate shot up from Dubya BS ending by 2009.
Obama with little help from the repuggers Obama took it down to about the same rate the Great Douche claims
IT did it all. For the Trumpster uneducated.
Which it lies about. There is no great difference from 2015' to 19' really. And you DOPers know this.

View attachment 287496

As Paul Harvey used to say, "and now, the rest of the story"!

JOHN CARNEY1 Nov 20194,802
1:46
Job creation was much stronger than expected in October.

The U.S. economy added 128,000 jobs for the month and the unemployment rate rose to 3.6 percent, higher than the month before but still near a 50-year low.

Economists had expected the economy to add 75,000 jobs, with forecasts ranging between 55,000 and 155,000, according to Econoday. That unusually wide range was caused, in part, by differing views of how the General Motors strike would hit employment at suppliers and related businesses.

Unemployment was expected to tick up to 3.6 percent.

Prior months were revised upward, indicating that the labor market has been much stronger than initial reports suggested. August’s initial 168,000 was revised up to 219,000. September’s soared from 136,000 to 180,000. Those revisions brought the three-month average up to 176,000.

The strength of the labor market was even more impressive because of the drag created by the GM strike and the government shedding workers it hired to conduct the census. The manufacturing sector shed 37,000 jobs in the month, many of which economists expect will be added back now that GM workers are back on the job. The government cut back by 17,000 jobs.

The pace of average hourly earnings rose by one-tenth of a percent to a year-over-year 3 percent gain. The average workweek was unchanged at 34.4 hours.

America Added 128,000 Jobs in October, Unemployment at 3.6% | Breitbart
 
So the Fed raises interest rates five times to crush the economy and is now back peddling as fast as it can to correct its screw up. Pelosi won't vote on USMCA. Impeachment bullshit waning on business and consumer confidence.
Then you want to blame Trump for not getting the economy growing faster.
Take the Hillary bumper sticker off your car. And take the pussy hat off your head.
Democrats know that they cannot beat the PResident if the economy is good.

So they talk it down and put out bad statements loaded with buzz words the HFT algos will key on to bring down the markets.

In spite of all this, before Trump, candidate bragged that they could get maybe 2% growth.

Trump has shifted the paradigm up in favor of the American people.
1.9 is not up from 2.
 
View attachment 287495

Be Honest DOPers. We all know why the unemployment rate shot up from Dubya BS ending by 2009.
Obama with little help from the repuggers Obama took it down to about the same rate the Great Douche claims
IT did it all. For the Trumpster uneducated.
Which it lies about. There is no great difference from 2015' to 19' really. And you DOPers know this.

View attachment 287496

As Paul Harvey used to say, "and now, the rest of the story"!

JOHN CARNEY1 Nov 20194,802
1:46
Job creation was much stronger than expected in October.

The U.S. economy added 128,000 jobs for the month and the unemployment rate rose to 3.6 percent, higher than the month before but still near a 50-year low.

Economists had expected the economy to add 75,000 jobs, with forecasts ranging between 55,000 and 155,000, according to Econoday. That unusually wide range was caused, in part, by differing views of how the General Motors strike would hit employment at suppliers and related businesses.

Unemployment was expected to tick up to 3.6 percent.

Prior months were revised upward, indicating that the labor market has been much stronger than initial reports suggested. August’s initial 168,000 was revised up to 219,000. September’s soared from 136,000 to 180,000. Those revisions brought the three-month average up to 176,000.

The strength of the labor market was even more impressive because of the drag created by the GM strike and the government shedding workers it hired to conduct the census. The manufacturing sector shed 37,000 jobs in the month, many of which economists expect will be added back now that GM workers are back on the job. The government cut back by 17,000 jobs.

The pace of average hourly earnings rose by one-tenth of a percent to a year-over-year 3 percent gain. The average workweek was unchanged at 34.4 hours.

America Added 128,000 Jobs in October, Unemployment at 3.6% | Breitbart
So, they thought that the job creation would be really really really bad & it is only really really bad & you think that is good.
 
You're right, this is terrible.

The Unemployment Rate Does Not Signal A Recession
Update - October 4, 2019
Oct. 4, 2019 10:29 AM ET

|The Unemployment Rate Does Not Signal A Recession: Update - October 4, 2019 | Seeking Alpha

###

Steve Moore: Middle-class Incomes Surge More Than $5,000 Under Trump Economy
BY PETER VICENZI
10/07/2019

Steve Moore: Middle-class Incomes Surge More Than $5,000 Under Trump Economy | FreedomWorks

###

Younger and Minority Workers Lead Wage Gains as Expansion Ages
Oct. 17, 2019, 8:59 AM

A tightening labor market with U.S. unemployment rate at a 50-year low is starting to result in higher wages for full-time workers, including younger people and minorities whose pay has lagged.

Median weekly earnings for Americans in the third quarter rose 3.6% to $919, outpacing inflation, the U.S. Labor Department reported Wednesday. Earnings for those aged 25 to 54, in their prime working years, rose by 5%, the fastest rate of growth in recent years.

Younger and Minority Workers Lead Wage Gains as Expansion Ages

###

ECONOMY
Record-low black unemployment cheered by black activists

Published 1 month ago on September 9, 2019

[...]

“Love him or hate him, this is an incredible economic accomplishment for the President and a tremendous benefit for American blacks,” said Project 21 member Derryck Green.

Along with a reported third straight month of 3.7 percent overall unemployment, the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) August jobs report noted that the overall black unemployment rate fell half-a-percent to 5.5 percent. This is the lowest black unemployment rate ever recorded. BLS began reporting employment statistics by race in 1972. And with overall white unemployment at 3.4 percent, it is also the smallest reported gap between the races ever in terms of joblessness. Until recently, the racial employment disparity between blacks and whites has generally held to a 2-1 margin.

Record-low black unemployment cheered by black activists

###

Younger and Minority Workers Lead Wage Gains as Expansion Ages
Oct. 17, 2019, 8:59 AM

A tightening labor market with U.S. unemployment rate at a 50-year low is starting to result in higher wages for full-time workers, including younger people and minorities whose pay has lagged.

Median weekly earnings for Americans in the third quarter rose 3.6% to $919, outpacing inflation, the U.S. Labor Department reported Wednesday. Earnings for those aged 25 to 54, in their prime working years, rose by 5%, the fastest rate of growth in recent years.

Younger and Minority Workers Lead Wage Gains as Expansion Ages

###

Help wanted: Too many jobs and not enough workers in most states
Tim Henderson, Stateline Published 8:00 a.m. CT Oct. 15, 2019 | Updated 7:10 p.m. CT Oct. 15, 2019

In 39 states, there are more jobs than people looking for them, according to a Stateline analysis of June hiring and employment data from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Help wanted: Too many jobs and not enough workers in most states

###

More?
And sure enough another repub claiming 1.9% is booming.

Unemployment is still low, but economic indicators make that unlikely to continue. That's about all trump has, most the wage gains are from min wage increases. What we have is 1.9% growth and trillion dollar deficits. A big failure.

Sad, Democrats wishful thinking. Wishfully hoping for the suffering of their fellow Americans. All because they suffered a landslide loss in the 2016 Presidential election. So sad!
Landslide 16' win LOL!! What a DOPer spew of deflection on winning with 77K votes in 3 states. HRC got 3 million more votes.
And we lost like 42K jobs in the auto section as I recall in the numbers. And one of the largest coal fraud companies in America went into bankruptcies.

The Great Douche loves coal. With that type of love, they should have started flipping burger 3 years ago.

What a DOPer spew of deflection on winning with 77K votes in 3 states.

What was the number of votes he needed to win by in those three states to make his win legitimate?
Explain the claim it was a landslide. How many of the 3 million illegal voters did you find for the great Douche?
You had a drag queen expose himself to little children the other day. All nice and legal. That is why there are millions of votes that are fraudulent.
 
Explain the claim it was a landslide. How many of the 3 million illegal voters did you find for the great

Grow up, what are you 12 years old?

Just prior to the election, the Clinton camp was forecasting that she would win 400 electoral votes. That would have left 132 electoral votes for President Trump. Instead, he won 306 and she won only 232, that's a landslide and so is this.

election-2016-county-map-M.png


Here's an interesting comparison too!

election%20and%20crime-XL.jpg
Your crime map is bullshit.

Maine, Vermont, NH & CT have some of the lowest crime rates.
 
So, they thought that the job creation would be really really really bad & it is only really really bad & you think that is good.

Your far left Progressive desperation is duly noted.

Abraham Lincoln
“It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.”

You would enhance your credibility by being realistic. Do you think throwing up foolish posts helps your Socialist cause?

As you know, we need about 125,000 new jobs per month to keep up with inflation. We had 128,000 new jobs so how is that "really really bad"?

Once we reach full employment, and you'll admit that 3.6% IS full employment, how do you add huge numbers above that 125,000 figure?
 
Last edited:
Explain the claim it was a landslide. How many of the 3 million illegal voters did you find for the great

Grow up, what are you 12 years old?

Just prior to the election, the Clinton camp was forecasting that she would win 400 electoral votes. That would have left 132 electoral votes for President Trump. Instead, he won 306 and she won only 232, that's a landslide and so is this.

election-2016-county-map-M.png


Here's an interesting comparison too!

election%20and%20crime-XL.jpg
Not a lot of crime in the vast federal lands that make up so much of the West.

not much crime in the millions of acres of cattle ranches, wheat fields, corn fields...
 
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.
 
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.

When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP.

No it isn't.
 
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.

So what you're saying is that the GDP, all the years of the failed administration of former President Barack Hussein Obama was far, far higher than what it was in reality! Got it!

When did the massive injection of cash into our economy start and when did the Fed start squeezing cash out of the system?
Monetary%20Base%20%202019-11-02-X3.jpg


https://photos.smugmug.com/Economy/.../ef0455a1/X3/Monetary Base 2019-11-02-X3.jpg
 
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.

So what you're saying is that the GDP, all the years of the failed administration of former President Barack Hussein Obama was far, far higher than what it was in reality! Got it!

When did the massive injection of cash into our economy start and when did the Fed start squeezing cash out of the system?
Monetary%20Base%20%202019-11-02-X3.jpg


https://photos.smugmug.com/Economy/Monetary-Base/i-CLSWkwp/0/ef0455a1/X3/Monetary Base 2019-11-02-X3.jpg

I don't think you got your complaint correct. No it was not far higher. It was what it was but it was highly misleading.
 
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.

So what you're saying is that the GDP, all the years of the failed administration of former President Barack Hussein Obama was far, far higher than what it was in reality! Got it!

When did the massive injection of cash into our economy start and when did the Fed start squeezing cash out of the system?
Monetary%20Base%20%202019-11-02-X3.jpg


https://photos.smugmug.com/Economy/Monetary-Base/i-CLSWkwp/0/ef0455a1/X3/Monetary Base 2019-11-02-X3.jpg

I don't think you got your complaint correct. No it was not far higher. It was what it was but it was highly misleading.

You stated this when you criticized the Fed putting money into the economy during the administration of President Donald Trump. IF that is the case, then the massive funds pumped into the economy during the failed administration of President Barack Hussein Obama must have had an even more pronounced effect on the GDP. Are you now changing your mind?

Pknopp: "GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading."
 
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.
Really, The GDP is over a longer time to look at results correctly.. Anthang near 2% is today's reality as companies moved to
the cheaper nations to make stuff or just import stuff etc. But we can feel it going from 2% to 4% that would e noticed greatly.




Here are the annual GDP for President Bush, Obama and the first two years of President Trump.

2019-04-06-X2.jpg

GDP is an incredibly misleading stat. When the Fed interjects billions into the markets that is counted in to the GDP. It's highly misleading.

So what you're saying is that the GDP, all the years of the failed administration of former President Barack Hussein Obama was far, far higher than what it was in reality! Got it!

When did the massive injection of cash into our economy start and when did the Fed start squeezing cash out of the system?
Monetary%20Base%20%202019-11-02-X3.jpg


https://photos.smugmug.com/Economy/Monetary-Base/i-CLSWkwp/0/ef0455a1/X3/Monetary Base 2019-11-02-X3.jpg

I don't think you got your complaint correct. No it was not far higher. It was what it was but it was highly misleading.

You stated this when you criticized the Fed putting money into the economy during the administration of President Donald Trump.

NO, I stated it as a general statement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top