Great Britain – Jihadi Wonderland

[irosie91]

What MUST Be Done About Islam

1. Declare Islam to be >> not a religion (as Italy and other countries have done).

2. Declare Islam unconstitutional and banned (by the Supremacy Clause)

3. Close all mosques, Islamic centers, etc.

4. Eliminate all vestiges of Islam (Korans, footwashing basins, prayer rooms, minarets, etc)

5. Ban the name Mohammed (all spellings) from birth certification.

6. Enact and enforce Muslim immigration/travel ban.

7. Deport all Muslims on FBI watch list.

8. Ban the Muslim Brotherhood and all MB front groups (see "Muslim Mafia", page 235 for US Justice Dept. list)

9. Close down all Muslim Brotherhood front group offices (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, etc)

10. Stop schools from banning protectionist books and videos (ex. Obsession: Radical Islam in Tarpon Springs, Florida)

11. Get all Muslims out of the US government.

All that is very interesting, but what do you achieve by doing that? All Muslim population of say Britain will forget their habits and beliefs and become true followers of the Western values?

Religions have been legislated out of existence in the past. In the remote past even Christian countries
legislated various religions out of existence. Muslim countries have never stopped doing so.
Non muslim countries can EMULATE their methods. Fair is fair.

That is understandable. But my question is – what to do with those millions of Muslims who already live in European countries and have their citizenship?

easy----LEGISLATION with love. Do you know what the PACT OF OMAR is ?

I have never heard about the pact of Omar before. But I read about it in Wiki after you mentioned it. Some of its provisions seem reasonable for me. But I still don’t understand what ‘legislation with love’ is and what it has to do with that.

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

 

[montelatici]

The Pact of Umar was a copy of Christian law relating to non-Christians living under Christian rule. It was actually written by Christians and sent to Umar for approval. It is awful for non-Muslims but has nothing to with Sharia. Do some research before posting nonsense.

"After the rapid expansion of the Muslim dominion in the 7th century, Muslims leaders were required to work out a way of dealing with Non-Muslims, who remained in the majority in many areas for centuries. The solution was to develop the notion of the "dhimma", or "protected person". The Dhimmi were required to pay an extra tax, but usually they were unmolested. This compares well with the treatment meted out to non-Christians in Christian Europe."

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

 

[irosie91]

The Pact of Umar was a copy of Christian law relating to non-Christians living under Christian rule. It was actually written by Christians and sent to Umar for approval. It is awful for non-Muslims but has nothing to with Sharia. Do some research before posting nonsense.

"After the rapid expansion of the Muslim dominion in the 7th century, Muslims leaders were required to work out a way of dealing with Non-Muslims, who remained in the majority in many areas for centuries. The solution was to develop the notion of the "dhimma", or "protected person". The Dhimmi were required to pay an extra tax, but usually they were unmolested. This compares well with the treatment meted out to non-Christians in Christian Europe."

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

try again------At inception it was something like a TREATY between Muslims and Christians----using
some of the concepts invented by the dog CONSTANTINE and imposed on NON-CHRISTIANS----
to which Christians living UNDER MUSLIM LAW agreed------Monte got that fragment right. It developed into the concept of DHIMMIA------which designated non muslims who MONOTHEISTS----a "PROTECTED" class that had a "right" to practice their own religion but under an increasing list of restrictions that
included the tribute poll tax "jizya" It also included the pig Constantine provision of DISARMAMENT.
"Protected" VERY QUICKLY morphed into oppressed and exploited and resulted in GENOCIDE----
wiping virtually all Christians and jews out of the Arabian Penninsula and vitually all Christians out
of many muslim controlled lands of the Middle east------That situation left jews with the option of
Islamic oppression vs Christian oppression. My very own hubby was born as a DHIMMI in a land
by then COMPLETELY DEVOID OF CHRISTIANS ------a total wipe out. Monte likes to white-wash
the SHIT in order to justify BAATHIST SHIT. This program began with the ARAB NATIONALIST
SOCIALIST movement which galvanized itself in the early 20th century and was INJECTED into the
USA by Monte's hero SADDAM HUSSEIN in the second half of the 20th century------the
terrorist organization CAIR-----is an outcome of that saddam galvanized shit. Baathist revisionist
history holds that DHIMMIA IS NICE-------------shariah law is CHOCK FULL OF THE PROVISIONS OF
DHIMMIA ------monte lied. the Baathist approach.

 

[ESay]

All that is very interesting, but what do you achieve by doing that? All Muslim population of say Britain will forget their habits and beliefs and become true followers of the Western values?

Religions have been legislated out of existence in the past. In the remote past even Christian countries
legislated various religions out of existence. Muslim countries have never stopped doing so.
Non muslim countries can EMULATE their methods. Fair is fair.

That is understandable. But my question is – what to do with those millions of Muslims who already live in European countries and have their citizenship?

easy----LEGISLATION with love. Do you know what the PACT OF OMAR is ?

I have never heard about the pact of Omar before. But I read about it in Wiki after you mentioned it. Some of its provisions seem reasonable for me. But I still don’t understand what ‘legislation with love’ is and what it has to do with that.

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

 

[irosie91]

Religions have been legislated out of existence in the past. In the remote past even Christian countries
legislated various religions out of existence. Muslim countries have never stopped doing so.
Non muslim countries can EMULATE their methods. Fair is fair.

That is understandable. But my question is – what to do with those millions of Muslims who already live in European countries and have their citizenship?

easy----LEGISLATION with love. Do you know what the PACT OF OMAR is ?

I have never heard about the pact of Omar before. But I read about it in Wiki after you mentioned it. Some of its provisions seem reasonable for me. But I still don’t understand what ‘legislation with love’ is and what it has to do with that.

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

 

[ESay]

That is understandable. But my question is – what to do with those millions of Muslims who already live in European countries and have their citizenship?

easy----LEGISLATION with love. Do you know what the PACT OF OMAR is ?

I have never heard about the pact of Omar before. But I read about it in Wiki after you mentioned it. Some of its provisions seem reasonable for me. But I still don’t understand what ‘legislation with love’ is and what it has to do with that.

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

And what should be done with those Muslims who refuse to follow the pact?

 

[irosie91]

easy----LEGISLATION with love. Do you know what the PACT OF OMAR is ?

I have never heard about the pact of Omar before. But I read about it in Wiki after you mentioned it. Some of its provisions seem reasonable for me. But I still don’t understand what ‘legislation with love’ is and what it has to do with that.

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

And what should be done with those Muslims who refuse to follow the pact?

they would be in violation of the law What happens to people who refuse to pay income tax? Of course-----as in the original-----they can get out of by leaving islam<<<< that's
accounts for the spread of islam in lands conquered by arabs

 

[ESay]

I have never heard about the pact of Omar before. But I read about it in Wiki after you mentioned it. Some of its provisions seem reasonable for me. But I still don’t understand what ‘legislation with love’ is and what it has to do with that.

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

And what should be done with those Muslims who refuse to follow the pact?

they would be in violation of the law What happens to people who refuse to pay income tax? Of course-----as in the original-----they can get out of by leaving islam<<<< that's
accounts for the spread of islam in lands conquered by arabs

What is the crucial difference between those times when the pact of Omar was made for non-Muslims and these times when the proposed analog should be made for Muslims? At those times Islam was on rise, its followers were young and passionate men who were keen to further their beliefs leaving aside any sentiments. And for the Christians the pact of Omar was a hope that they will have relatively safe live. It was a desirable thing for them in the first turn. Maybe I am mistaken, but it is how I understand this.


Now, the situation is completely different. Young Muslims whose number is growing feel themselves completely safe in the Western society enjoying all the rights which have other citizens. Moreover, they feel their own strength. And if you demand that they accept the pact or leave Islam, they will laugh in your face. Frighten them with jail? Come on, there’s already districts to which the police feels better not to go even in broad daylight.

 

[irosie91]

Muslims are very proud of the PACT OF OMAR-------they claim it is a remarkably advanced and
humanitarian system of TOLERANCE OF DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM OF THE PRACTICE OF
RELIGION AND EQUALITY IN SOCIETY. Whatever it is you read in Wiki-----is watered down for
the glory of islam. The provisions of the Pact of Omar are designed to effectuate genocide of
non muslims. In Europe----the provisions of the pact of Omar were restated in the famous
NUREMBURG LAWS ----that legalized genocide in the third Reich. Feel free to ask questions----
The Pact of Omar is alive -----it exists in various forms thruout the muslim world as provisions of
shariah law and accounts for the absence or markedly depleted non-muslim populations in "muslim" countries. In the land in which my hubby was born----there are no Christians or jews or anything
else non muslim left AT ALL. -----legislated out of existence. In current times ISIS uses the provisions
of the Pact of Omar to get rid of the YAZIDIS ----sorta leftover Zoroastrians Khartoum used those laws
to legally get rid of Christians in Southern sudan--and----enslave their children. No actual
DEATH CAMPS required

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

And what should be done with those Muslims who refuse to follow the pact?

they would be in violation of the law What happens to people who refuse to pay income tax? Of course-----as in the original-----they can get out of by leaving islam<<<< that's
accounts for the spread of islam in lands conquered by arabs

What is the crucial difference between those times when the pact of Omar was made for non-Muslims and these times when the proposed analog should be made for Muslims? At those times Islam was on rise, its followers were young and passionate men who were keen to further their beliefs leaving aside any sentiments. And for the Christians the pact of Omar was a hope that they will have relatively safe live. It was a desirable thing for them in the first turn. Maybe I am mistaken, but it is how I understand this.


Now, the situation is completely different. Young Muslims whose number is growing feel themselves completely safe in the Western society enjoying all the rights which have other citizens. Moreover, they feel their own strength. And if you demand that they accept the pact or leave Islam, they will laugh in your face. Frighten them with jail? Come on, there’s already districts to which the police feels better not to go even in broad daylight.

the difference is that muslims were able and WILLING to impose their "pact" ------
and today are ABLE AND WILLING TO IMPOSE ----what amounts to the same
PACT in various parts of the world. In the land in which my hubby was born----the
PACT STILL LIVES-------of course it is true that no more than ten jews and no Christians
live in that land-------but the LAWS ARE STILL ON THE BOOKS and muslims cite them
as RIGHTEOUS. Christians did accept the restrictive laws 1000 years ago------but generally LEFT those lands-----since there were actual Christian lands to which they could flee.
How to "convince" muslims------LEGISLATE THE STUFF INTO LAW-------and allow them
the FREEDOM to leave. Today----in the world of today------the imposition of such filth
will not be accepted voluntarily------it must be ENFORCED

 

[ESay]

All that is very interesting, but frankly I have lost the thread of discussion. What do you propose? To implement an analog of the pact of Omar in the Western countries for Muslims?

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

And what should be done with those Muslims who refuse to follow the pact?

they would be in violation of the law What happens to people who refuse to pay income tax? Of course-----as in the original-----they can get out of by leaving islam<<<< that's
accounts for the spread of islam in lands conquered by arabs

What is the crucial difference between those times when the pact of Omar was made for non-Muslims and these times when the proposed analog should be made for Muslims? At those times Islam was on rise, its followers were young and passionate men who were keen to further their beliefs leaving aside any sentiments. And for the Christians the pact of Omar was a hope that they will have relatively safe live. It was a desirable thing for them in the first turn. Maybe I am mistaken, but it is how I understand this.


Now, the situation is completely different. Young Muslims whose number is growing feel themselves completely safe in the Western society enjoying all the rights which have other citizens. Moreover, they feel their own strength. And if you demand that they accept the pact or leave Islam, they will laugh in your face. Frighten them with jail? Come on, there’s already districts to which the police feels better not to go even in broad daylight.

the difference is that muslims were able and WILLING to impose their "pact" ------
and today are ABLE AND WILLING TO IMPOSE ----what amounts to the same
PACT in various parts of the world. In the land in which my hubby was born----the
PACT STILL LIVES-------of course it is true that no more than ten jews and no Christians
live in that land-------but the LAWS ARE STILL ON THE BOOKS and muslims cite them
as RIGHTEOUS. Christians did accept the restrictive laws 1000 years ago------but generally LEFT those lands-----since there were actual Christian lands to which they could flee.
How to "convince" muslims------LEGISLATE THE STUFF INTO LAW-------and allow them
the FREEDOM to leave. Today----in the world of today------the imposition of such filth
will not be accepted voluntarily------it must be ENFORCED

I agree that this stuff must be enforced. And there shouldn’t be any freedom to leave. Because they have this freedom now and are not in hurry to take advantage of this. There should be an order to leave. Everything else aside from this will be in vain.

BTW, where is your husband from, if it is not a secret of course?

 

[irosie91]

yes------with some modifications. I do not propose that the rape of muslim girls
should be made legal

And what should be done with those Muslims who refuse to follow the pact?

they would be in violation of the law What happens to people who refuse to pay income tax? Of course-----as in the original-----they can get out of by leaving islam<<<< that's
accounts for the spread of islam in lands conquered by arabs

What is the crucial difference between those times when the pact of Omar was made for non-Muslims and these times when the proposed analog should be made for Muslims? At those times Islam was on rise, its followers were young and passionate men who were keen to further their beliefs leaving aside any sentiments. And for the Christians the pact of Omar was a hope that they will have relatively safe live. It was a desirable thing for them in the first turn. Maybe I am mistaken, but it is how I understand this.


Now, the situation is completely different. Young Muslims whose number is growing feel themselves completely safe in the Western society enjoying all the rights which have other citizens. Moreover, they feel their own strength. And if you demand that they accept the pact or leave Islam, they will laugh in your face. Frighten them with jail? Come on, there’s already districts to which the police feels better not to go even in broad daylight.

the difference is that muslims were able and WILLING to impose their "pact" ------
and today are ABLE AND WILLING TO IMPOSE ----what amounts to the same
PACT in various parts of the world. In the land in which my hubby was born----the
PACT STILL LIVES-------of course it is true that no more than ten jews and no Christians
live in that land-------but the LAWS ARE STILL ON THE BOOKS and muslims cite them
as RIGHTEOUS. Christians did accept the restrictive laws 1000 years ago------but generally LEFT those lands-----since there were actual Christian lands to which they could flee.
How to "convince" muslims------LEGISLATE THE STUFF INTO LAW-------and allow them
the FREEDOM to leave. Today----in the world of today------the imposition of such filth
will not be accepted voluntarily------it must be ENFORCED

I agree that this stuff must be enforced. And there shouldn’t be any freedom to leave. Because they have this freedom now and are not in hurry to take advantage of this. There should be an order to leave. Everything else aside from this will be in vain.

BTW, where is your husband from, if it is not a secret of course?

Yemen----an interesting place----one of the first shariah shit holes outside of
what is today Saudi Arabia. Feel free to ask questions------while he does not
remember -----I did get to know all about it from his relatives and----community
members. I cannot live with the idea of disallowing ESCAPE--------let's be
reasonable

 

[Challenger]

And? What do you propose to do with them?

What MUST Be Done About Islam

1. Declare Islam to be >> not a religion (as Italy and other countries have done).

2. Declare Islam unconstitutional and banned (by the Supremacy Clause)

3. Close all mosques, Islamic centers, etc.

4. Eliminate all vestiges of Islam (Korans, footwashing basins, prayer rooms, minarets, etc)

5. Ban the name Mohammed (all spellings) from birth certification.

6. Enact and enforce Muslim immigration/travel ban.

7. Deport all Muslims on FBI watch list.

8. Ban the Muslim Brotherhood and all MB front groups (see "Muslim Mafia", page 235 for US Justice Dept. list)

9. Close down all Muslim Brotherhood front group offices (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, etc)

10. Stop schools from banning protectionist books and videos (ex. Obsession: Radical Islam in Tarpon Springs, Florida)

11. Get all Muslims out of the US government.

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

 

[irosie91]

And? What do you propose to do with them?

What MUST Be Done About Islam

1. Declare Islam to be >> not a religion (as Italy and other countries have done).

2. Declare Islam unconstitutional and banned (by the Supremacy Clause)

3. Close all mosques, Islamic centers, etc.

4. Eliminate all vestiges of Islam (Korans, footwashing basins, prayer rooms, minarets, etc)

5. Ban the name Mohammed (all spellings) from birth certification.

6. Enact and enforce Muslim immigration/travel ban.

7. Deport all Muslims on FBI watch list.

8. Ban the Muslim Brotherhood and all MB front groups (see "Muslim Mafia", page 235 for US Justice Dept. list)

9. Close down all Muslim Brotherhood front group offices (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, etc)

10. Stop schools from banning protectionist books and videos (ex. Obsession: Radical Islam in Tarpon Springs, Florida)

11. Get all Muslims out of the US government.

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

Put back the word "JEW" and you have a good approximation of SHARIAH LAW

 

[Challenger]

And? What do you propose to do with them?

What MUST Be Done About Islam

1. Declare Islam to be >> not a religion (as Italy and other countries have done).

2. Declare Islam unconstitutional and banned (by the Supremacy Clause)

3. Close all mosques, Islamic centers, etc.

4. Eliminate all vestiges of Islam (Korans, footwashing basins, prayer rooms, minarets, etc)

5. Ban the name Mohammed (all spellings) from birth certification.

6. Enact and enforce Muslim immigration/travel ban.

7. Deport all Muslims on FBI watch list.

8. Ban the Muslim Brotherhood and all MB front groups (see "Muslim Mafia", page 235 for US Justice Dept. list)

9. Close down all Muslim Brotherhood front group offices (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, etc)

10. Stop schools from banning protectionist books and videos (ex. Obsession: Radical Islam in Tarpon Springs, Florida)

11. Get all Muslims out of the US government.

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

Put back the word "JEW" and you have a good approximation of SHARIAH LAW

Not so much, but are you inferring Protectionist is a secret Islamist fanatic?

 

[protectionist]

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

No he wouldn't. He'd pat me on the back, and kick your teeth in, for trying to equate Muslims with Jews. How dumb!

 

[montelatici]

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

No he wouldn't. He'd pat me on the back, and kick your teeth in, for trying to equate Muslims with Jews. How dumb!

What's the difference. Both practice circumcision for boys, both don't eat pork, bought follow the principle of an eye for an eye and both consider those of other religions inferior.

 

[protectionist]

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

No he wouldn't. He'd pat me on the back, and kick your teeth in, for trying to equate Muslims with Jews. How dumb!

What's the difference. Both practice circumcision for boys, both don't eat pork, bought follow the principle of an eye for an eye and both consider those of other religions inferior.

And that's all you know, huh ? HA HA HA. Go back to sleep. Sorry we woke you.

HERE's the difference, dummy >>

3000 dead in New York

Fort Hood Victims

San Bernardino Attack victims

Boston Marathon Victims

Pulse Club Attack victims

 

[irosie91]

j

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

No he wouldn't. He'd pat me on the back, and kick your teeth in, for trying to equate Muslims with Jews. How dumb!

What's the difference. Both practice circumcision for boys, both don't eat pork, bought follow the principle of an eye for an eye and both consider those of other religions inferior.

gee monte. "both practice circumcision" << that's how you define a whole RELIGION?
Both muslims and Hindus drink water--------they must the DA SAME THING.
Christians imagine that anyone who does not "believe in..... <<<<whatevah that means .....
.... "jesus" <<< whoevah that is .......is on his way to a very hot place called
"hell" -----------its ok -----all of mankind eats toasted marshmallows on July 4

 

[Challenger]

Replace the word "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have a good approximation of the 1935 Nuremburg Laws, Eisenhower would spit in your face if he was still alive.

No he wouldn't. He'd pat me on the back, and kick your teeth in, for trying to equate Muslims with Jews. How dumb!

Given Ike spent most of his time fighting the ideology that created the 1935 Nuremburg laws, I suspect he'd be doing more spitting than patting in your direction. You and your kind are just the same as the Nazis, you just have a different group to pick on. I wasn't equating Muslims to Jewish people, I was equating your ideas with those of the Nazis.

 

[Challenger]

...all of mankind eats toasted marshmallows on July 4

How revealing, so anyone who doesn't eat toasted marshmallows on 4th July isn't a member of mankind then...one of the untermenschen?