Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It goes without saying that the same is true with me.
What do you do, if you don't mind me asking?
Insurance..Senior products, Medicare Supplements, final expense,Long Term Care, Annuities etc.
I guess Medicare makes up a large percentage of your income...probably more than me!
It's late...too late. Time for a few hours of sleep.
but she still has to PAY INTO the PONZI schemeIt is possible ... while there are laws that are suppose to keep businesses from discriminating against the elderly and disabled ... they find ways around it. It becomes a trap, one that I was in and only got out by chance really ... well, more like I was placing myself in the right places at the right times so that eventually I would be able to start making money again without having to get a "regular" job.
There are ways but not for the vast majority.
Conservatives:
"ABSOLUTELY NO EARMARKS!......But since they passed, I'll take a few."
"ENTITLEMENTS SHOULD BE STOPPED!......But when I turn 65, I'll take Medicare."
Alaska receives more federal money per capita than any other state, in spite of the fact that Alaska has untold tax revenue from oil wealth. Much of this can be attributed to the long career of Ted Stevens.
The $250 million dollar appropriation for the "bridge to nowhere" was particularly aggreious to me, since I live in an area of 2 million people that desperately needs new bridges.
Oblahblah said earmarks are ok, thanks for playing.......
This has nothing to do with Obama. Try reading the article.
It has EVERTHING to do with Obama--he promised through-out the campaign season that he would not sign bills with earmarks in them. He lied. He stated on two different occasions that there were no EARMARKS in the 787 BILLION dollar stimulus--we find out that at least 1/3 of the bill is for earmarks. He lied.
He gave a speech just two weeks ago--blasting earmarks & then SIGNS this ominus bill that is loaded with over 9000 earmarks. It's his signature on these bills not Sarah Palin's.
BTW--you noted in your article that was congressmen from Alaska that asked for these earmarks--not Sarah Palin. Congressmen ask for earmarks--Not govenors. That is not their job.
Nice try to smoke--screen the issue in a futile attempt to take our eyes off of President Obama--but it isn't working.
Sarah Palin: More Earmark Hypocrisy | Mother Jones
On the campaign trail last year, Alaska's Republican governor, Sarah Palin, sold herself as a crusading reformer who despised earmarks--those federal spending projects that Capitol Hill legislators of both parties slip into appropriations bills. Though her claim to have turned down an earmark for the now-infamous Bridge to Nowhere was debunked by assorted media outlets, she kept on insisting that if she were elected vice president, she would lead a charge in Washington against earmarks.
That was then. The omnibus spending bill that President Barack Obama signed on Wednesday includes earmarks that Palin sought.
The $410 billion bill has been lambasted by Republicans and a few Democrats for being loaded with nearly 9,000 earmarks covering $7.7 billion in projects. Senator John McCain, Palin's former ticket-mate, has blasted Obama for supporting the earmark-laden legislation. ("So much for the promise of change," an angry McCain howled from the Senate floor.) But earmarks in the bill are quite generous to Palin's state. According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington-based watchdog group, Alaska will receive more money, per capita, from the bill's earmarks than any other state. (Alaska will pocket $209.71 for each state resident.) One hundred earmarks in the bill, worth a total of $143.9 million, are tagged for Palin's state.
Asked by Mother Jones about the Alaska earmarks, Bill McAllister, Palin's communications director, pointed to Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) as responsible for these provisions. But in an email, he noted that a "few of [the Alaska earmarks] were requested directly" by Palin. But how many? And which ones? McAllister declined to say. Mother Jones also asked McAllister if Palin believes it was appropriate for Murkowski and Young to insert these earmarks into the legislation and whether she will reject any earmarked funds. He did not answer those queries either.
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
damn, just when i think your stupidity has peaked...you assault the heights yet again.
the hypocrisy of some rube sitting in alaska has zero effect on my life- POTUS is a different story.
get it, dorkboi?
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
Sorry Sonny...No matter what Palin said or promised in the comapaign, SHE is in NO position to change anything...SHE LOST.....shes powerless.....
But..
Some asshole that made campaign promises WON and CAN do what he promised, but instead ignores his promises....THATS BEING A HYPOCRITE .....
You oughta can your Palin hypocrisy and worry about Obambas...
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
one more time, Palin wasn't running against Obama for President. McCain was. and before you assume McCain would have died, his mother is 94 FUCKING YEARS OLD.
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
Sorry Sonny...No matter what Palin said or promised in the comapaign, SHE is in NO position to change anything...SHE LOST.....shes powerless.....
But..
Some asshole that made campaign promises WON and CAN do what he promised, but instead ignores his promises....THATS BEING A HYPOCRITE .....
So it's okay if Palin said one thing and did another because she's a Republican? Just admit it -you're a partisan asshole who doesn't see anything other than his own point of view.
Weren't you leaving?
only a blind partisan asshole would think that
How funny. You guys are willing to overlook Palin's hypocrisy but not Obama's. And how many of you right-wingers voted for her to be our VP?
In other words, Obama's hypocrisy matters more because of the D next to his name, but whenever a Republican is a hypocrite.. well, the elephant's shit don't stink, eh?
Losers.
Sorry Sonny...No matter what Palin said or promised in the comapaign, SHE is in NO position to change anything...SHE LOST.....shes powerless.....
But..
Some asshole that made campaign promises WON and CAN do what he promised, but instead ignores his promises....THATS BEING A HYPOCRITE .....
So it's okay if Palin said one thing and did another because she's a Republican? Just admit it -you're a partisan asshole who doesn't see anything other than his own point of view.
Weren't you leaving?
Sorry Sonny...No matter what Palin said or promised in the comapaign, SHE is in NO position to change anything...SHE LOST.....shes powerless.....
But..
Some asshole that made campaign promises WON and CAN do what he promised, but instead ignores his promises....THATS BEING A HYPOCRITE .....
So it's okay if Palin said one thing and did another because she's a Republican? Just admit it -you're a partisan asshole who doesn't see anything other than his own point of view.
Weren't you leaving?
says the person who thought it was ok for Obama to blow 150 million on his inauguration, but not ok for Palin to spend 150 grand on her wardrobe.
no shitSorry Sonny...No matter what Palin said or promised in the comapaign, SHE is in NO position to change anything...SHE LOST.....shes powerless.....
But..
Some asshole that made campaign promises WON and CAN do what he promised, but instead ignores his promises....THATS BEING A HYPOCRITE .....
So it's okay if Palin said one thing and did another because she's a Republican? Just admit it -you're a partisan asshole who doesn't see anything other than his own point of view.
Weren't you leaving?
says the person who thought it was ok for Obama to blow 150 million on his inauguration, but not ok for Palin to spend 150 grand on her wardrobe.
