The Democratic Fall campaign is already clearly under way. Trump's three denials of the apparent new version of Jesus Christ, David Duke, are simply the campaign reminders that could even start running any day now(?). Less on the surface is the other problem for Republicans. Trump is not opposed to big government. His people seem more opposed to its direction, than its size.There is too much not mainstream Republican Conservative, in the likely new-Trump campaign. Giant Factions of the GOP may regroup, suspend a lot of rules, and not compromise as usual around a national platform. How much of that makes the news may be overshadowed, admittedly, by the call-in interviews from outer space(?). It is being noted in the Rubio camp how hard it is for Trump to put on his face, in the morning(?)!
Mostly the Republican could maybe draft Boehner to run for President(?)! Anyone might ask if they are actually in the midst of some nature of group hangover. . .personified(?)!
No one new gets showcased in a Trump Convention, more likely? Back to 1964, Lyndon Johnson, getting the cult-of-personality going, and with a "Great Society" to boot. . .is actually plausible. One problem actually does originate of Goldwater, possibly commenting on Donald Trump. "In your guts, you know he's nuts!" The Cuban contingent back then was still hoping for the return of a Bautista, kind of Island fascism(?)!
Trump orders several people removed from rally
That is not necessarily reflected in the link. The Conservative Factions, mostly bluntly, have nothing to lose by refusing to go along with any Trump-based agenda. That is not even blunt in the link.
In any re-grouping, any new GOP will be different from today, and possibly for a more big-government. . .local presence. . . .than Conservatives have in mind. One Trump child is Jewish, possibly happy with a right to an abortion. "Limited Government" has not been discussed by Trump in the debates. Like Senator Sanders, something more European may become the national GOP health plan concept, in a Trump dominated, GOP.
Then there is the matter of just who gets to be on any federal courts. The Conservative have no guarantees, or even a semblance of any likely input. The campaign jokes about that were more likely written at after-dinner meetings, just during the last weekend. There can likely emerge a more "celebratory ambience," and likely loaded, regarding what Trump Republicans propose. That becomes itself, the GOP.
And then if the Conservatives are less than enthused, with the urban Democrats turning out to vote--then more likely they have nothing to for work in any elective office, starting 2017.
Some would say, "Just like they are right now!" Mostly that means way more Democrats creating the national agenda, and starting from the top--with an historical precedent to boot.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations can put in for local fences--charge more at the local entrance gates--if maybe there are liberal Trump voters, in Hollywood(?). . .doo dah, doo dah(?)!)
Mostly the Republican could maybe draft Boehner to run for President(?)! Anyone might ask if they are actually in the midst of some nature of group hangover. . .personified(?)!
No one new gets showcased in a Trump Convention, more likely? Back to 1964, Lyndon Johnson, getting the cult-of-personality going, and with a "Great Society" to boot. . .is actually plausible. One problem actually does originate of Goldwater, possibly commenting on Donald Trump. "In your guts, you know he's nuts!" The Cuban contingent back then was still hoping for the return of a Bautista, kind of Island fascism(?)!
Trump orders several people removed from rally
That is not necessarily reflected in the link. The Conservative Factions, mostly bluntly, have nothing to lose by refusing to go along with any Trump-based agenda. That is not even blunt in the link.
In any re-grouping, any new GOP will be different from today, and possibly for a more big-government. . .local presence. . . .than Conservatives have in mind. One Trump child is Jewish, possibly happy with a right to an abortion. "Limited Government" has not been discussed by Trump in the debates. Like Senator Sanders, something more European may become the national GOP health plan concept, in a Trump dominated, GOP.
Then there is the matter of just who gets to be on any federal courts. The Conservative have no guarantees, or even a semblance of any likely input. The campaign jokes about that were more likely written at after-dinner meetings, just during the last weekend. There can likely emerge a more "celebratory ambience," and likely loaded, regarding what Trump Republicans propose. That becomes itself, the GOP.
And then if the Conservatives are less than enthused, with the urban Democrats turning out to vote--then more likely they have nothing to for work in any elective office, starting 2017.
Some would say, "Just like they are right now!" Mostly that means way more Democrats creating the national agenda, and starting from the top--with an historical precedent to boot.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations can put in for local fences--charge more at the local entrance gates--if maybe there are liberal Trump voters, in Hollywood(?). . .doo dah, doo dah(?)!)
