Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think the President said it best......
. It is my fervent goal and hope that we will some day no longer have to rely on nuclear weapons to deter aggression and assure world peace. To that end the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal of eliminating these weapons from the face of the earth.
Eliminatewhat a moron, not possible they have already been invented, they are here use you friken head
It wasn't President Obama who said that.......it was President Reagan
I notice you have a nice tribute to Reagan in your signature line.....do you still think he is a moron?
Eliminate
It wasn't President Obama who said that.......it was President Reagan
I notice you have a nice tribute to Reagan in your signature line.....do you still think he is a moron?
Good one... but that quote was referring to missile defense "star wars" which would render nuclear missiles obsolete keep it in context whack job.
I think the President said it best......
. It is my fervent goal and hope that we will some day no longer have to rely on nuclear weapons to deter aggression and assure world peace. To that end the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal of eliminating these weapons from the face of the earth.
Soooo
when do you think the rest of the world will disarm?
Since you live in the same fantasy world big 0 does....
That was not the fantasy world of President Obama, it was the fantasy world of President Reagan
It wasn't President Obama who said that.......it was President Reagan
I notice you have a nice tribute to Reagan in your signature line.....do you still think he is a moron?
Good one... but that quote was referring to missile defense "star wars" which would render nuclear missiles obsolete keep it in context whack job.
"the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons "
What about the difference between "missile defense" and "offensive nuclear weapons" don't you understand?
Eliminate
It wasn't President Obama who said that.......it was President Reagan
I notice you have a nice tribute to Reagan in your signature line.....do you still think he is a moron?
Good one... but that quote was referring to missile defense "star wars" which would render nuclear missiles obsolete keep it in context whack job.
Soooo
when do you think the rest of the world will disarm?
Since you live in the same fantasy world big 0 does....
That was not the fantasy world of President Obama, it was the fantasy world of President Reagan
RR actually got the Russians to toss theirs as well.
Big 0 just wants to toss ours.
That was not the fantasy world of President Obama, it was the fantasy world of President Reagan
RR actually got the Russians to toss theirs as well.
Big 0 just wants to toss ours.
That is a blatant lie. Obama is looking at mutual disarmament, the same as Reagan was
It wasn't President Obama who said that.......it was President Reagan
I notice you have a nice tribute to Reagan in your signature line.....do you still think he is a moron?
Good one... but that quote was referring to missile defense "star wars" which would render nuclear missiles obsolete keep it in context whack job.
No it wasn't. It came when Reagan was negotiating the START treaty with Gorbachev. Reagan was a convert to the concept of nuclear disarmament. As it is, the US and Russia still hold most of the worlds nukes. Most other countries are small time players.
Good one... but that quote was referring to missile defense "star wars" which would render nuclear missiles obsolete keep it in context whack job.
"the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons "
What about the difference between "missile defense" and "offensive nuclear weapons" don't you understand?
I understand that Reagan wanted to make nuclear weapons Oboslete with Starwars, that hasn't happend yet..You?
RR actually got the Russians to toss theirs as well.
Big 0 just wants to toss ours.
That is a blatant lie. Obama is looking at mutual disarmament, the same as Reagan was
with who?
"the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons "
What about the difference between "missile defense" and "offensive nuclear weapons" don't you understand?
I understand that Reagan wanted to make nuclear weapons Oboslete with Starwars, that hasn't happend yet..You?
I noticed words like "negotiate", "reductions" and "offensive". NOPE, nothing about "defense" or "Star Wars".
.OBAMA TO SHARE SECRETS
President Obama signaled Congress this week that he is prepared to share U.S. missile defense secrets with Russia.
In the president’s signing statement issued Saturday in passing into law the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill, Mr. Obama said restrictions aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on U.S. Standard Missile-3 velocity burnout parameters might impinge on his constitutional foreign policy authority.
As first disclosed in this space several weeks ago, U.S. officials are planning to provide Moscow with the SM-3 data, despite reservations from security officials who say that doing so could compromise the effectiveness of the system by allowing Russian weapons technicians to counter the missile. The weapons are considered some of the most effective high-speed interceptors in the U.S. missile defense arsenal.
There are also concerns that Russia could share the secret data with China and rogue states such as Iran and North Korea to help their missile programs defeat U.S. missile defenses.
Officials from the State Department and Missile Defense Agency have discussed the idea of providing the SM-3 data to the Russians as part of the so-far fruitless missile-defense talks with Moscow, headed in part of by Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher, who defense officials say is a critic of U.S. missile defenses.
Their thinking is that if the Russians know the technical data, it will help allay Moscow’s fears that the planned missile defenses in Europe would be used against Russian ICBMs. Officials said current SM-3s are not fast enough to catch long-range Russian missiles, but a future variant may have some anti-ICBM capabilities.
Ms. Tauscher has repeatedly denied that her talks with the Russians are secret. However, the administration has provided almost no briefings about the talks to Congress, which prompted critics of the talks to include language in the new defense spending law limiting data-sharing.
Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology, as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they would be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.
The president also must certify to Congress that Russia will not share the secrets with other states and that it will not help Russia “to develop countermeasures” to U.S. defenses.
The certification also must show whether Russia is providing equal access to its missile defense technologies, which are mainly nuclear-tipped anti-missile interceptors.
Mr. Obama said in the signing statement that he would treat the legal restrictions as “non-binding.”
“While my administration intends to keep the Congress fully informed of the status of U.S. efforts to cooperate with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense, my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 in a manner that does not interfere with the president’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications,” Mr. Obama said, incorrectly identifying the section of the law containing the restrictions
