GOP Counteroffer

The Obama media could convince Obama supporters that repeatedly slamming their dicks in the door will help the economy.

All they need is a snappy sloagan.
and if conservatives keep telling themselves that low tax rates for the wealthy create jobs, we would swimming in them. basic math and reasoning is difficult i know.

The Truth About The Bush Tax Cuts And Job Growth - Forbes

Do Lower Taxes Create Jobs? Let

Lower corporate taxes won't create more jobs - Term Sheet

CHART: Lower Taxes On The Rich Don't Lead To Job Growth | ThinkProgress
 
The Obama media could convince Obama supporters that repeatedly slamming their dicks in the door will help the economy.

All they need is a snappy sloagan.
and if conservatives keep telling themselves that low tax rates for the wealthy create jobs, we would swimming in them. basic math and reasoning is difficult i know.

The Truth About The Bush Tax Cuts And Job Growth - Forbes

Do Lower Taxes Create Jobs? Let

Lower corporate taxes won't create more jobs - Term Sheet

CHART: Lower Taxes On The Rich Don't Lead To Job Growth | ThinkProgress

The numbers sometimes tend to lie. During the Bush years we had massive job losses because of 9/11 and Katrina. Also, anyone who knows economics knows that all economies are local. The job of the White House is to produce a climate that is conducive to economic growth, which Bush did. It's not his problem states like California, New York, and Michigan didn't have leadership willing to capitalize on it. California alone drags down the overall economic numbers. Most of the positive numbers come from only a few states including Texas, Wisconsin, and North Dakota.

In the first link the author operates in a total vacuum thinking Bush drives the economy like a bus. Problem is Dems in big cities have ideas of their own. In Sacramento Democrats were overheard discussing ways to screw up California's economy even more.
 
Last edited:
Good stuff.

Now we can start moving.

It's harder today than it would have been yesterday, way harder than if it had been done 12 or 20 years ago. But much easier than in another 4 years.
 
It's unacceptable because...

a. Boooooooooooooooooooooooosh

b. Tax cuts for the wealthy!!!

c. This is why your party is dying!!

Pretty much. That and voters already rejected it after Romney proposed it.
 
It's unacceptable because...

a. Boooooooooooooooooooooooosh

b. Tax cuts for the wealthy!!!

c. This is why your party is dying!!

Pretty much. That and voters already rejected it after Romney proposed it.

The voters have no clue what they voted for. At least not the Obama voters........those that really exist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top