Good Question Jon Stewart

[ClosedCaption]

Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.

 

[Katzndogz]

The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

 

[ClosedCaption]

The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.

Both are. You hate only one

 

[Katzndogz]

Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

He's sticking up for his surfer dude viewers.

 

[Avatar4321]

One involves protecting what is yours. The other involves taking from others by force.

Pretty clear why one might be in favor of one and against the other.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.

Both are. You hate only one

One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.

 

[Warrior102]

Who the fuck is John Stewart?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

Stewart once again rendering idiots unable to address the statement

 

[Sallow]

The moochers are those taking advantage when they should be out taking care of themselves.

Both are. You hate only one

One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.

Made the money, how exactly?

If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?

 

[NightFox]

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

Jon Stewart is a comedian, he makes jokes, it's not his fault if certain sheeple use said jokes as a basis for their view of reality.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Both are. You hate only one

One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.

Made the money, how exactly?

If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?

Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.

Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.

 

[NightFox]

One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.

Made the money, how exactly?

If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?

Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.

Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.

Surely you're not referring to government contracts for the U.S. "Patronage and Cronyism Our Us" Government, right?

 

[ClosedCaption]

One involves protecting what is yours. The other involves taking from others by force.

Pretty clear why one might be in favor of one and against the other.

Yes because the tax breaks come from magic bags of money that appear when you sign a tax form

 

[Sallow]

One has made the money and uses the law to keep as much of their own earnings as possible. Therefor they can never be classified as a moocher. The other is in line to get their hands on money that was taken from someone else. The very definition of a moocher.

Made the money, how exactly?

If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?

Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.

Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.

Who's willing?

The government?

Aren't you folks mad about the government spending money on stuff you don't use?

I mean like the F-35..

About 400 Billion and counting.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

Jon Stewart is a comedian, he makes jokes, it's not his fault if certain sheeple use said jokes as a basis for their view of reality.

This is a message board, a board where messages are displayed. Still doesn't address the topic. I see a pattern

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Just think how many more good folks could be on food stamps if evil corporatiions paid their "fair share".....lol

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Made the money, how exactly?

If a corporation gets a government grant or contract..is that "earning" or mooching?

Made money by providing a product or a service others are willing to pay for.

Government contracts are earned by providing the product or the service the government deemed necessary.

Surely you're not referring to government contracts for the U.S. "Patronage and Cronyism Our Us" Government, right?

Heck no. Those people go in the moocher column.

 

[NightFox]

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

Jon Stewart is a comedian, he makes jokes, it's not his fault if certain sheeple use said jokes as a basis for their view of reality.

This is a message board, a board where messages are displayed. Still doesn't address the topic. I see a pattern

I'm pleased that apparently the footwear was a perfect fit..... please let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

 

[Avatar4321]

Both are legal. Only one hated by Repubs.

Stewart once again impressing clueless adolescents with mindless rhetoric....

Stewart once again rendering idiots unable to address the statement

And yet the statement has been addressed without any problem whatsoever. Your denial doesn't make that any less true.