Good guy with a gun saved lives at second NZ mosque.

Discussion in 'Australia' started by justoffal, Mar 15, 2019.

  1. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    74,231
    Thanks Received:
    13,523
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +55,355

    The AR-15 is not an assault rifle.......it is a regular, semi-automatic rifle, just like all the other semi-automatic firearms......but thanks for lying.

    The one thing they all have in common, they are all gun free zones, attacked by someone who broke that law.
     
  2. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    74,231
    Thanks Received:
    13,523
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +55,355

    You are a fool.

    You must now agree to sue every car maker when their car is used by a drunk driver, an inattentive teenager, also, all cell phone makers are now responsible if someone is texting while driving.......you are a fool...
     
  3. Blues Man
    Offline

    Blues Man Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2016
    Messages:
    4,303
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    160
    Ratings:
    +2,293
  4. Blues Man
    Offline

    Blues Man Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2016
    Messages:
    4,303
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    160
    Ratings:
    +2,293
    See there are such things as stupid questions.

    If anyone at the concert was carrying a concealed handgun he wouldn't have been able to shoot into the hotel window the shooter was using so even if he had a handgun the correct decision was to not fire at the hotel because there was no way to hit the shooter but there was a very high possibility of hitting innocent bystanders
     
  5. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    74,231
    Thanks Received:
    13,523
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +55,355

    They average one every ten years, except for the last few years they almost had 4.......that were not stopped by their gun control laws, but were only stopped by dumb luck...

    Since the British police state they can't stop the increasing flow of illegal guns into the country, which means criminals have access to more and more guns....which gun control law currently stops them from walking into a mall, church, theater or school today?



    Teenage boys planned to 'kill everyone' at Yorkshire school in Columbine-style gun and bomb massacre, court hears

    Two teenage boys planned to “kill everyone” at their Yorkshireschool in a Columbine-style massacre using bombs and guns, a court has heard.

    ---------------------------

    The document said the boy would “lay low” in Catterick before murdering his ex-girlfriend’s parents and stealing her father’s guns, the court heard.

    “I’ll make some explosives then well find a way back to Northallerton and well begin our assault on that f****** school,” it continued

    ----

    "This was no teenage fantasy; it was real,” he added. “They intended a re-enactment of the Columbine High School Massacre although fortunately, in the result, they were stopped before their plans were put into action.”

    .4/6/18

    Doctor found with stash of guns and NHS hitlist jailed

    A former doctor has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for stockpiling guns with the intent to endanger life.

    Martin Watt was found with three submachine guns, two pistols and 1,500 live cartridges at a property in Cumbernauld, Scotland, last year.

    The 62-year-old had lost his job at Monklands hospital in North Lanarkshire in 2012 after disciplinary hearings. His marriage broke down around the same time, the high court in Glasgow was told.

    Watt had compiled a list of names and addresses of some colleagues involved in the disciplinary process, which the judge, Valerie Stacey, said Watt had referred to as an assassination list.
    =======



    Here is the updat, the original is below..

    Yep.....this 19 year old got bombs and a glock 19 and 94 rounds of 9mm ammo on the dark web in Britain in order to murder people at the University he used to attend..........

    I guess their gun control laws stopped him...right? Or was it pure, dumb luck.....?


    -------------

    British teen sentenced to life for planned school attack

    Despite some of the tightest gun control on the planet, a British man was able to acquire a handgun, extended mags and explosives as part of a plot to attack his former school.

    Liam Lyburd, 19, of Newcastle upon Tyne, was sentenced to life imprisonment this week on eight charges of possessing weapons with intent to endanger life.

    As noted by the BBC, Lyburd gathered a cache that included a Glock 19, three 33-round magazines, 94 hollow-point bullets, CS gas, five pipe bombs and two other improvised explosive devices despite the country’s long history of civilian arms control.

    According to court documents, Lyburd planned to use the weapons in an attack on Newcastle College, from which he had been expelled two years prior for poor attendance. He was arrested last November after two Northumbria Police constables visited him at his home on a tip from an individual who encountered threats and disturbing pictures posted by Lyburd online.

    Despite a defense that portrayed the reclusive man as living in a fantasy world, Lyburd was found guilty in July.

    The internet-savvy teen obtained the Glock and other items through Evolution Marketplace, a successor to the Silk Road, a long-time “dark web” site in which users could buy and sell everything from illegal narcotics to munitions using Bitcoin cryptocurrency.

    In court, Lyburd testified that buying the Glock was so easy it was “like buying a bar of chocolate.”

    He obtained funds for his purchases through a complex extortion scheme in which he used online malware to infect computers, which he in turn held for ransom from their owners.

    ====Teenage boy 'took shotgun to school after being bullied for being fat'


    15-year-old boy arrested for taking shotgun and ammunition into school did it because he was being bullied for being too fat, fellow pupils said.

    =======




    'Gunman' walks into Liverpool nursery school as children were playing inside

    Police have sealed off a children's nursery in Liverpool amid reports a gunman walked into the building while youngsters were inside.

    Officers were called to Childs Play Nursery in Wavertree, Merseyside, at around 8am this morning.

    The man, who is believed to have been carrying what looked like a firearm, walked into the nursery and approached another man.

    He then left with a second man on the back of a motorbike.







    Children among 10 people in hospital after mass shooting in Manchester



    Ten people, including two children, were taken to hospital after a shooting at a street party in the Moss Side area of Manchester.


    Armed police officers rushed to the scene on a residential street at 2.30am on Sunday, where a party was being held following a Caribbean Carnival at a nearby park.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  6. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    52,414
    Thanks Received:
    10,953
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +37,386
    Nonsense.

    Again, citizens have the fundamental right to carry a firearm pursuant to lawful self-defense – not act in the capacity of ‘law enforcement,’ not to ‘prevent tyranny,’ and not to ‘fight crime.’

    Study: Concealed Handgun Permits Don't Affect Crime Rate
     
  7. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    74,231
    Thanks Received:
    13,523
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +55,355

    It's funny that you never mention these research papers on the topic, which show the exact opposite conclusion....one would think you don't want anyone to know about them.....

    http://crimeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Bartley-Cohen-Economic-Inquiry-1998.pdf


    The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis by William Alan Bartley and Mark A Cohen, published in Economic Inquiry, April 1998 (Copy available here)

    .....we find strong support for the hypothesis that the right-to-carry laws are associated with a decrease in the trend in violent crime rates.....

    Paper........CCW does not increase police deaths...

    http://crimeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Mustard-JLE-Polic-Deaths-Gun-Control.pdf

    This paper uses state-level data from 1984–96 to examine how right-to-carry laws and waiting periods affect the felonious deaths of police. Some people oppose concealed weapons carry laws because they believe these laws jeopardize law enforcement officials, who risk their lives to protect the citizenry. This paper strongly rejects this contention. States that allowed law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons had a slightly higher likelihood of having a felonious police death and slightly higher police death rates prior to the law. After enactment of the right-to-carry laws, states exhibit a reduced likelihood of having a felonious police death rate and slightly lower rates of police deaths. States that implement waiting periods have slightly lower felonious police death rates both before and after the law. Allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons does not endanger the lives of officers and may help reduce their risk of being killed

    ========

    http://johnrlott.tripod.com/tideman.pdf


    Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say By FLORENZ PLASSMANN AND T. NICOLAUS TIDEMAN, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

    However, for all three crime categories the levels in years 2 and 3 after adoption of a right-to-carry law are significantly below the levels in the years before the adoption of the law, which suggests that there is generally a deterrent effect and that it takes about 1 year for this effect to emerge.

    =======

    http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/323313

    Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness*




    Carlisle E. Moody
    College of William and Mary
    Overall, right‐to‐carry concealed weapons laws tend to reduce violent crime. The effect on property crime is more uncertain. I find evidence that these laws also reduce burglary.
    ====
    http://crimeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Helland-Tabarrok-Placebo-Laws.pdf

    Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime”∗ Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok

    We also find, however, that the cross equation restrictions implied by the Lott-Mustard theory are supported.
    -----
    Surprisingly, therefore, we conclude that there is considerable support for the hypothesis that shall-issue laws cause criminals to substitute away from crimes against persons and towards crimes against property.
    ===========
    http://johnrlott.tripod.com/Maltz.pdf


    Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships By DAVID E. OLSON AND MICHAEL D. MALTZ, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

    Our results indicated that the direction of effect of the shall-issue law on total SHR homicide rates was similar to that obtained by Lott and Mustard, although the magnitude of the effect was somewhat smaller and was statistically significant at the 7 percent level. In our analysis, which included only counties with a 1977 population of 100,000 or more, laws allowing for concealed weapons were associated with a 6.52 percent reduction in total homicides (Table 2). By comparison, Lott and Mustard found the concealed weapon dummy variable to be associated with a 7.65 percent reduction in total homicides across all counties and a 9 percent reduction in homicides when only large counties (populations of 100,000 or more) were included.43

    ===============

    This one shows the benefits, in the billions of CCW laws...

    http://johnrlott.tripod.com/Plassmann_Whitley.pdf

    COMMENTS Confirming ìMore Guns, Less Crimeî Florenz Plassmann* & John Whitley**

    CONCLUSION Analyzing county-level data for the entire United States from 1977 to 2000, we find annual reductions in murder rates between 1.5% and 2.3% for each additional year that a right-to-carry law is in effect. For the first five years that such a law is in effect, the total benefit from reduced crimes usually ranges between about $2 and $3 billion per year. The results are very similar to earlier estimates using county-level data from 1977 to 1996. We appreciate the continuing effort that Ayres and Donohue have made in discussing the impact of right-to-carry laws on crime rates. Yet we believe that both the new evidence provided by them as well as our new results show consistently that right-to-carry laws reduce crime and save lives. Unfortunately, a few simple mistakes lead Ayres and Donohue to incorrectly claim that crime rates significantly increase after right-to-carry laws are initially adopted and to misinterpret the significance of their own estimates that examined the year-to-year impact of the law.

    =============

    http://crimeresearch.org/wp-content...An-Exercise-in-Replication.proof_.revised.pdf

    ~ The Impact of Right-to-Carry Laws on Crime: An Exercise in Replication1

    Carlisle E. Moody College of William and Mary - Department of Economics, Virginia 23187, U.S.A. E-mail: cemood@wm.edu Thomas B. Marvell Justec Research, Virginia 23185, U.S.A. Paul R. Zimmerman U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. Fasil Alemante College of William and Mary, Virginia 23187, U.S.A.


    Abstract: In an article published in 2011, Aneja, Donohue and Zhang found that shall-issue or right-to-carry (RTC) concealed weapons laws have no effect on any crime except for a positive effect on assault. This paper reports a replication of their basic findings and some corresponding robustness checks, which reveal a serious omitted variable problem. Once corrected for omitted variables, the most robust result, confirmed using both county and state data, is that RTC laws significantly reduce murder. There is no robust, consistent evidence that RTC laws have any significant effect on other violent crimes, including assault. There is some weak evidence that RTC laws increase robbery and assault while decreasing rape. Given that the victim costs of murder and rape are much higher than the costs of robbery and assault, the evidence shows that RTC laws are socially beneficial.

    =======

    States with lower guns = higher murder....and assault weapon ban pointless..

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2013.854294

    An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates
    Mark Gius

    Abstract
    The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of state-level assault weapons bans and concealed weapons laws on state-level murder rates. Using data for the period 1980 to 2009 and controlling for state and year fixed effects, the results of the present study suggest that states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murder rates than other states. It was also found that assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level. These results suggest that restrictive concealed weapons laws may cause an increase in gun-related murders at the state level. The results of this study are consistent with some prior research in this area, most notably Lott and Mustard (1997).





    Taking apart ayre and donahue one....




    “The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, volume 5, number 3, September 2008 It is also available here..



    Abstract
    “Shall-issue” laws require authorities to issue concealed-weapons permits to anyone who applies, unless the applicant has a criminal record or a history of mental illness. A large number of studies indicate that shall-issue laws reduce crime. Only one study, an influential paper in the Stanford Law Review (2003) by Ian Ayres and John J. Donohue iii, implies that these laws lead to an increase in crime. We apply an improved version of the Ayres and Donohue method to a more extensive data set. Our analysis, as well as Ayres and Donohue’s when projected beyond a five-year span, indicates that shall-issue laws decrease crime and the costs of crime. Purists in statistical analysis object with some cause to some of methods employed both by Ayres and Donohue and by us. But our paper upgrades Ayres and Donohue, so, until the next study comes along, our paper should neutralize Ayres and Donohue’s “more guns, more crime” conclusion.

    Summary and Conclusion Many articles have been published finding that shall-issue laws reduce crime. Only one article, by Ayres and Donohue who employ a model that combines a dummy variable with a post-law trend, claims to find that shall-issue laws increase crime. However, the only way that they can produce the result that shall-issue laws increase crime is to confine the span of analysis to five years. We show, using their own estimates, that if they had extended their analysis by one more year, they would have concluded that these laws reduce crime. Since most states with shallissue laws have had these laws on the books for more than five years, and the law will presumably remain on the books for some time, the only relevant analysis extends beyond five years. We extend their analysis by adding three more years of data, control for the effects of crack cocaine, control for dynamic effects, and correct the standard errors for clustering. We find that there is an initial increase in crime due to passage of the shall-issue law that is dwarfed over time by the decrease in crime associated with the post-law trend. These results are very similar to those of Ayres and Donohue, properly interpreted. The modified Ayres and Donohue model finds that shall-issue laws significantly reduce murder and burglary across all the adopting states. These laws appear to significantly increase assault, and have no net effect on rape, robbery, larceny, or auto theft. However, in the long run only the trend coefficients matter. We estimate a net benefit of $450 million per year as a result of the passage of these laws. We also estimate that, up through 2000, there was a cumulative overall net benefit of these laws of $28 billion since their passage. We think that there is credible statistical evidence that these laws lower the costs of crime. But at the very least, the present study should neutralize any “more guns, more crime” thinking based on Ayres and Donohue’s work in the Stanford Law Review. We acknowledge that, especially in light of the methodological issues of the literature in general, the magnitudes derived from our analysis of crime statistics and the supposed costs of crime might be dwarfed by other considerations in judging the policy issue. Some might contend that allowing individuals to carry a concealed weapon is a moral or cultural bad. Others might contend that greater liberty is a moral or cultural good. All we are confident in saying is that the evidence, such as it is, seems to support the hypothesis that the shall-issue law is generally beneficial with respect to its overall long run effect on crime.



    The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws · Econ Journal Watch : shall-issue, crime, handguns, concealed weapons
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. NotfooledbyW
    Offline

    NotfooledbyW Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,097
    Thanks Received:
    901
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,334
    2aguy, post: 22036798
    I must never need to agree with an idiot. You want me to equate a motor vehicle which is an essential tool in our modern global society to an AR15 firearm which has no utilty in civilian life other than be a recreational plaything for grown up boys who fancy themselves playing soldier when they fire one.

    It’s a matter of technological purpose, moron. Motor vehicles have a specific function beyond pure recreation such as the means of commuting to and from work and transporting just about everybody and their things they need on all the streets and highways in the world to the zillions of places that everybody goes.

    The purpose of an AR15 at least by its style and technological design is to resemble a weapon that soldiers use in a combat zone. There is no need for such a weapon outside a war zone except to be played with as if it were a toy. A very lethal toy.

    The major difference between a Ford F-150 and a Remington Bushmaster in this recent court ruling:

    “..... Connecticut Supreme Court opinion holding that the manufacturer of the semi-automatic rifle used in the Sandy Hook shooting may be held liable for violating state unfair-trade-practices statutes. The legal reasoning behind the ruling, if applied broadly, would directly defy federal law and could potentially deal a staggering financial blow to firearms manufacturers and sellers in the United States.”

    Gun Rights: Sandy Hook Lawsuit Ruling Endangers Firearms Industry, Constitutional Freedoms | National Review

    ...is that Ford does not market their pickup truck as a weapon for use in combat to kill human beings most efficiently.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. NotfooledbyW
    Offline

    NotfooledbyW Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,097
    Thanks Received:
    901
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,334
    2aguy, post: 22037491
    No need for your wall of words since gun homicides reached a two decades low in the US in 2010 then leveled off.

    Gun ownership has risen since 2010 but the level of gun homicides has remained statistically unchanged. If there were a direct correlation between an increase in gun ownership and decrease in homicides the homicide rate would continue to go down from 2010 to present. But it doesn’t.

    It’s something else such as the US population has matured relative to the baby boom, Fewer young people means fewer crimes.
     
  10. NotfooledbyW
    Offline

    NotfooledbyW Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,097
    Thanks Received:
    901
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,334
    I’m not predicting that more lawful gun owners will drive the gun homicide rate up.

    I’m saying that an increase in gun ownership is not a driver in reducing gun homicides. It certainly has an impact on accidental shootings some of which leads to death.,

    17 million gun owners do not carry their firearms 24/7 locked and loaded and on high alert ready to intervene wherever and whenever the bad guys are about to shoot good guys or other bad guys?

    I’m sure a majority of legal gun owners live in rural or smaller town areas which is not where the majority of gun homicides occur.

    Many gun homicides happen out of public view between domestic partners or family members. How does gun ownership drive that statistic down?
     

Share This Page