Going too far: Men's rights groups sue Women's organizations to get settlements (not equal access)

[emilynghiem]

These men's rights activists are using a 1950s law to shut down women in tech

PROTECT WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AND COMMUNITIES FROM "EQUALITY-SEEKERS"

Oh, boy. I mean girrrrrl!!!!

Some men's activist groups have found loopholes for suing women's organizations for discrimination.
Not to try to correct the policy or get access to women only events,
but to get paid settlements that cost less than the legal fees to fight!

=======================

I offer the same solution as for the gay wedding services controversy:
have new clients sign waivers with the businesses agreeing to
either settle all disputes amicably by conflict resolution and concensus,
to AVOID legal actions or expenses, or else agree to REFRAIN from doing
business together if the parties have differences in beliefs that cannot be reconciled.

Instead of judging or blaming one side or the other,
if ANY conflict comes up that cannot be reconciled by FREE mediation
then both parties AGREE not to do business together in order to respect the beliefs of both sides.

If people cannot agree to mediate to resolve conflicts,
I would not recommend doing business with them anyway,
or you can attract these litigious types looking to make money off any kind of conflict, accident or mishap.

 

[Godboy]

Fair is fair. Women's groups want to force male clubs to accept women, so now men are fighting back. I hope they bankrupt these hypocritical feminists.

 

[defcon4]

These men's rights activists are using a 1950s law to shut down women in tech

PROTECT WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AND COMMUNITIES FROM "EQUALITY-SEEKERS"

Oh, boy. I mean girrrrrl!!!!

Some men's activist groups have found loopholes for suing women's organizations for discrimination.
Not to try to correct the policy or get access to women only events,
but to get paid settlements that cost less than the legal fees to fight!

=======================

I offer the same solution as for the gay wedding services controversy:
have new clients sign waivers with the businesses agreeing to
either settle all disputes amicably by conflict resolution and concensus,
to AVOID legal actions or expenses, or else agree to REFRAIN from doing
business together if the parties have differences in beliefs that cannot be reconciled.

Instead of judging or blaming one side or the other,
if ANY conflict comes up that cannot be reconciled by FREE mediation
then both parties AGREE not to do business together in order to respect the beliefs of both sides.

If people cannot agree to mediate to resolve conflicts,
I would not recommend doing business with them anyway,
or you can attract these litigious types looking to make money off any kind of conflict, accident or mishap.

"You may find cases against women's self-defense classes, promotion of women in sports, special discounts for ladies and many others."
It all started in earnest with the Virginia Military Institute.
"Vmi's First Female Cadet Withdraws From School"
Vmi's First Female Cadet Withdraws From School

 

[Disir]

These men's rights activists are using a 1950s law to shut down women in tech

PROTECT WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AND COMMUNITIES FROM "EQUALITY-SEEKERS"

Oh, boy. I mean girrrrrl!!!!

Some men's activist groups have found loopholes for suing women's organizations for discrimination.
Not to try to correct the policy or get access to women only events,
but to get paid settlements that cost less than the legal fees to fight!

=======================

I offer the same solution as for the gay wedding services controversy:
have new clients sign waivers with the businesses agreeing to
either settle all disputes amicably by conflict resolution and concensus,
to AVOID legal actions or expenses, or else agree to REFRAIN from doing
business together if the parties have differences in beliefs that cannot be reconciled.

Instead of judging or blaming one side or the other,
if ANY conflict comes up that cannot be reconciled by FREE mediation
then both parties AGREE not to do business together in order to respect the beliefs of both sides.

If people cannot agree to mediate to resolve conflicts,
I would not recommend doing business with them anyway,
or you can attract these litigious types looking to make money off any kind of conflict, accident or mishap.

If both parties were open to mediation that would be one thing but this group is not open to it.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

Regardless of what you may think about the principles advocated by men's rights activists you have got to admit that these "men" are sniveling little twats. A real man stands on his own two feet and makes his own path. He does not whine about equal access and such bullshit. This is a man's world. Enjoy it while we can!

 

[waltky]

Uncle Ferd don't see no wrong in it...

... afterall, womens alla time hittin' men up fer money...

... turnabout is fair play, don't cha know.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So women want equality EXCEPT when it comes to them not being treated special?Real simply if it is against the law to have a male only group then EQUALITY means it is also against the law to have a similar group female only.