God & Decent Human Beings Hear The Screams

They only care about fetuses. Once a child is born, they don't want to spend their precious tax dollars on them.

That's a fun lie, isn't it? But no, we still work to stop you from killing children even after they are born.

Realize, they don't really care about children or babies. What they care about is women who do not follow their belief system. Because of this, they want to "punish" these women with babies that they don't want.

I realize that the market for human organs is hot, you need more victims to keep the channels filled. Keeping you from killing babies isn't "punishing" you. There are other ways to make money.
 
They only care about fetuses. Once a child is born, they don't want to spend their precious tax dollars on them.
To ChrisL: I’ve heard your tax dollar excuse from the day killing babies was legitimated by seven lawyers. Say something original. America’s welfare state slaughtering babies is hardly original.

Indeed, you are ridiculous. Killing babies that would be born into the poorest segment of the population is all about Democrat bureaucrats not wanting American children growing up and accessing all of those welfare programs they so readily give to millions of illegal aliens.

It's also about punishing women for what they deem to be "irresponsible" behavior, such as having sex before marriage.
To ChrisL: It’s not about sexual conduct. It’s about ripping babies apart in the cruelest way imaginable. You are so sick you obvious believe that it is better to kill a baby, than it is to bring the baby to term and putting it up for adoption. If you get a brain transplant from one of those butchered babies you will be a lot smarter than you are now.
The most telling thing of all as to their real feelings is how, once a baby is born, they don't care at all about it, it's education, how it will survive, if it is born to parents who don't want it.
To ChrisL: You can rest easy. More than 55 million did not survive in this country alone. Planned Parenthood will increase that total with tax dollars by approximately four hundred thousand dead babies every year.

As to education: The government demands control of educating children. How is that working out for you?

Incidentally, the day is coming when the parasite class will demand an end to homeschooling. This is only the beginning:


"There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children, either independent of their right to direct the upbringing and education of their children or encompassed by it. We also hold that parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."— Fields v. Palmdale School District PSD, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (2005)​

Do parents have a right to control the upbringing of their children, especially when it comes to what their children should be exposed to in terms of sexual practices and intimate relationships?

Do Parents' Rights End at the Schoolhouse Gate?
By John W. Whitehead
May 09, 2011

The Rutherford Institute Do Parents Rights End at the Schoolhouse Gate

Parenthetically, the explosion of unwanted pregnancies is a direct result of Democrat party policies. They teach promiscuity —— then they promise to kill the babies they encourage.

NOTE: This is what Socialism teaches children worldwide:


An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N. Children’s Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and teens: “Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure: 1. Masturbation. 2. Sexual relations with a partner — whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3. A sexual response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals, minors, non-consenting persons.”

Child sex book given out at U.N. summit
Washington Times 05/10/12 George Archibald

The UN has plans for your children

Presumably, you would not object to UNICEF teaching sex to American children.
They only care about forcing their views and religious beliefs upon others. I think this is quite obvious.
To ChrisL: If you think forcing religious beliefs on others is obvious, try Socialist priests forcing their religion on the country:

This priest is one of the foulest human beings Democrats ever sent to Congress:


r-steny-hoyer-mitt-romney-large570.jpg

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) (AP)

Hoyer: 'I Reject Any Premise that Planned Parenthood is Harvesting Fetal Organs, or Body Parts'
By Kathleen Brown and Margaret Knapp | July 21, 2015 | 4:25 PM EDT

Hoyer I Reject Any Premise that Planned Parenthood is Harvesting Fetal Organs or Body Parts

More than simply defending Planned Parenthood’s funding, the Foul One is defending the federal government’s authority to do anything it decides to do —— so long as it is done for the common good in accordance with his beliefs.

My point: If the government has the authority to remove organs from babies in the womb, Hoyer’s priesthood surely believes the government has the authority to take organs from living children and adults:


Do you remember Cass Sunstein, Obama’s Regulatory Czar who became famous for saying that the government “owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone’s permission,” and, bow, wow, that dogs are entitled to have lawyers to sue humans in court? He has recently emerged to publish an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal enthusiastically supporting Obama’s global regulatory harmonization.

Obama Lunges Toward Global Government
by Phyllis Schlafly
June 6, 2012

http://www.eagleforum.org/publications/column/2012-06-06.html
 
It's also about punishing women for what they deem to be "irresponsible" behavior, such as having sex before marriage. Although I'm quite sure almost all of them had premarital sex with women who did not end up being their wives.

The most telling thing of all as to their real feelings is how, once a baby is born, they don't care at all about it, it's education, how it will survive, if it is born to parents who don't want it. They only care about forcing their views and religious beliefs upon others. I think this is quite obvious.

Yes that is it. They have some inborn need to force their beliefs on others. And they are content to let thousands of children die every day and instead of helping them they spend money on the internet ranting. Its easy, if they want to save children they can do so every minute of every day rather than be here accomplishing nothing but yelling at other people.

But they don't.
 
They only care about fetuses. Once a child is born, they don't want to spend their precious tax dollars on them.

That's a fun lie, isn't it? But no, we still work to stop you from killing children even after they are born.

Realize, they don't really care about children or babies. What they care about is women who do not follow their belief system. Because of this, they want to "punish" these women with babies that they don't want.

I realize that the market for human organs is hot, you need more victims to keep the channels filled. Keeping you from killing babies isn't "punishing" you. There are other ways to make money.

Quit lying. You don't give two shits about some strange women's babies. You want to punish these women for not living up to your expectations and you don't want to spend your tax dollars on providing for these babies after you force women to complete a pregnancy and delivery for your own "moral" expectations. You are a hypocrite in every sense of the word.
 
It's also about punishing women for what they deem to be "irresponsible" behavior, such as having sex before marriage. Although I'm quite sure almost all of them had premarital sex with women who did not end up being their wives.

The most telling thing of all as to their real feelings is how, once a baby is born, they don't care at all about it, it's education, how it will survive, if it is born to parents who don't want it. They only care about forcing their views and religious beliefs upon others. I think this is quite obvious.

Yes that is it. They have some inborn need to force their beliefs on others. And they are content to let thousands of children die every day and instead of helping them they spend money on the internet ranting. Its easy, if they want to save children they can do so every minute of every day rather than be here accomplishing nothing but yelling at other people.

But they don't.

They don't give two shits about any strange women's babies who they never met. It's a bogus act. They are more than willing to let these same children starve and die due to lack of food and medical care. They say, "leave it to charity." Just like Scrooge.
 
They only care about fetuses. Once a child is born, they don't want to spend their precious tax dollars on them.
To ChrisL: I’ve heard your tax dollar excuse from the day killing babies was legitimated by seven lawyers. Say something original. America’s welfare state slaughtering babies is hardly original.

Indeed, you are ridiculous. Killing babies that would be born into the poorest segment of the population is all about Democrat bureaucrats not wanting American children growing up and accessing all of those welfare programs they so readily give to millions of illegal aliens.

It's also about punishing women for what they deem to be "irresponsible" behavior, such as having sex before marriage.
To ChrisL: It’s not about sexual conduct. It’s about ripping babies apart in the cruelest way imaginable. You are so sick you obvious believe that it is better to kill a baby, than it is to bring the baby to term and putting it up for adoption. If you get a brain transplant from one of those butchered babies you will be a lot smarter than you are now.
The most telling thing of all as to their real feelings is how, once a baby is born, they don't care at all about it, it's education, how it will survive, if it is born to parents who don't want it.
To ChrisL: You can rest easy. More than 55 million did not survive in this country alone. Planned Parenthood will increase that total with tax dollars by approximately four hundred thousand dead babies every year.

As to education: The government demands control of educating children. How is that working out for you?

Incidentally, the day is coming when the parasite class will demand an end to homeschooling. This is only the beginning:


"There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children, either independent of their right to direct the upbringing and education of their children or encompassed by it. We also hold that parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."— Fields v. Palmdale School District PSD, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (2005)​
Do parents have a right to control the upbringing of their children, especially when it comes to what their children should be exposed to in terms of sexual practices and intimate relationships?

Do Parents' Rights End at the Schoolhouse Gate?
By John W. Whitehead
May 09, 2011

The Rutherford Institute Do Parents Rights End at the Schoolhouse Gate

Parenthetically, the explosion of unwanted pregnancies is a direct result of Democrat party policies. They teach promiscuity —— then they promise to kill the babies they encourage.

NOTE: This is what Socialism teaches children worldwide:


An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N. Children’s Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and teens: “Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure: 1. Masturbation. 2. Sexual relations with a partner — whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3. A sexual response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals, minors, non-consenting persons.”

Child sex book given out at U.N. summit
Washington Times 05/10/12 George Archibald

The UN has plans for your children

Presumably, you would not object to UNICEF teaching sex to American children.
They only care about forcing their views and religious beliefs upon others. I think this is quite obvious.
To ChrisL: If you think forcing religious beliefs on others is obvious, try Socialist priests forcing their religion on the country:

This priest is one of the foulest human beings Democrats ever sent to Congress:


r-steny-hoyer-mitt-romney-large570.jpg

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) (AP)

Hoyer: 'I Reject Any Premise that Planned Parenthood is Harvesting Fetal Organs, or Body Parts'
By Kathleen Brown and Margaret Knapp | July 21, 2015 | 4:25 PM EDT

Hoyer I Reject Any Premise that Planned Parenthood is Harvesting Fetal Organs or Body Parts

More than simply defending Planned Parenthood’s funding, the Foul One is defending the federal government’s authority to do anything it decides to do —— so long as it is done for the common good in accordance with his beliefs.

My point: If the government has the authority to remove organs from babies in the womb, Hoyer’s priesthood surely believes the government has the authority to take organs from living children and adults:


Do you remember Cass Sunstein, Obama’s Regulatory Czar who became famous for saying that the government “owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone’s permission,” and, bow, wow, that dogs are entitled to have lawyers to sue humans in court? He has recently emerged to publish an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal enthusiastically supporting Obama’s global regulatory harmonization.

Obama Lunges Toward Global Government
by Phyllis Schlafly
June 6, 2012

Obama Lunges Toward Global Government

To you, you are so full of shit I can smell you from here.
 
Quit lying.

I would have to start lying first, and let's face it, that's something more appropriate for you.

You don't give two shits about some strange women's babies.

Nor do you give two shits about some strange women.

I care about a society where the most basic of human rights, the right to live, is protected by due process. Where the state cannot end a life without judicial review and protection of the rights of the intended victim.

You seek a society where convenience holds a higher ranking than does life.

You want to punish these women for not living up to your expectations and you don't want to spend your tax dollars on providing for these babies after you force women to complete a pregnancy and delivery for your own "moral" expectations. You are a hypocrite in every sense of the word.

Now you're being childish because you cannot formulate a rational argument to support your position.

If I restrain a man from raping women in a back alley, your argument is that I have "punished him;" which is absurd to the point of stupid.
 
Quit lying.

I would have to start lying first, and let's face it, that's something more appropriate for you.

You don't give two shits about some strange women's babies.

Nor do you give two shits about some strange women.

I care about a society where the most basic of human rights, the right to live, is protected by due process. Where the state cannot end a life without judicial review and protection of the rights of the intended victim.

You seek a society where convenience holds a higher ranking than does life.

You want to punish these women for not living up to your expectations and you don't want to spend your tax dollars on providing for these babies after you force women to complete a pregnancy and delivery for your own "moral" expectations. You are a hypocrite in every sense of the word.

Now you're being childish because you cannot formulate a rational argument to support your position.

If I restrain a man from raping women in a back alley, your argument is that I have "punished him;" which is absurd to the point of stupid.

You are lying. I'm not the one trying to force "strange women" to give birth to babies that they don't want. That would be people like you. You don't care about those women or those babies. That is a cop out and nothing more. You seek a society where you can force women to live by your religious views.
 
Quit lying.

I would have to start lying first, and let's face it, that's something more appropriate for you.

You don't give two shits about some strange women's babies.

Nor do you give two shits about some strange women.

I care about a society where the most basic of human rights, the right to live, is protected by due process. Where the state cannot end a life without judicial review and protection of the rights of the intended victim.

You seek a society where convenience holds a higher ranking than does life.

You want to punish these women for not living up to your expectations and you don't want to spend your tax dollars on providing for these babies after you force women to complete a pregnancy and delivery for your own "moral" expectations. You are a hypocrite in every sense of the word.

Now you're being childish because you cannot formulate a rational argument to support your position.

If I restrain a man from raping women in a back alley, your argument is that I have "punished him;" which is absurd to the point of stupid.

If you CARED about these lives, you would want your taxpayer dollars to go to support them. You are just a horrible hypocrite who wants to force your will onto women.
 
You are lying.

What, exactly am I lying about?

Mindless ad hom from your emotional meltdown fails to offer a compelling argument.

I'm not the one trying to force "strange women" to give birth to babies that they don't want.

More emotion laden demagoguery devoid of rational thought.

The reason you cannot construct a reasoned argument and must resort to a childish tantrum is simply that you have no reasoned argument.

My position is that if you seek to deprive others of life - which is what you demand - then a civilized society must have a system of judicial review to ensure that the rights of the victim are protected. You seek to deprive others of life - make your case before a judge in each instance.

That would be people like you. You don't care about those women or those babies. That is a cop out and nothing more. You seek a society where you can force women to live by your religious views.

Yes, mindless ad hom is the best you can do. Rational thought is not something that you engage in.
 
You are lying.

What, exactly am I lying about?

Mindless ad hom from your emotional meltdown fails to offer a compelling argument.

I'm not the one trying to force "strange women" to give birth to babies that they don't want.

More emotion laden demagoguery devoid of rational thought.

The reason you cannot construct a reasoned argument and must resort to a childish tantrum is simply that you have no reasoned argument.

My position is that if you seek to deprive others of life - which is what you demand - then a civilized society must have a system of judicial review to ensure that the rights of the victim are protected. You seek to deprive others of life - make your case before a judge in each instance.

That would be people like you. You don't care about those women or those babies. That is a cop out and nothing more. You seek a society where you can force women to live by your religious views.

Yes, mindless ad hom is the best you can do. Rational thought is not something that you engage in.

You are getting too emotional, relax. Try to allow some rational thought in there through all of your tantrum.

In a perfect world abortion wouldn't be necessary, but this isn't and never will be a perfect world. I'd prefer there were no abortions but that would require forcing my will on women.

You not only want to do that you want the government to force it's will on women. The Supreme Court says sorry Charlie, you aren't forcing anyone to do anything.

So, stop spending all this time posting on the internet and go save the children that are already here that need your help.

Or ignore them.

You have choice.
 
It is hard for me to understand how selling baby parts justifies hating right-wingers:

nucatola.jpg

Deborah Nucatola
is Senior Director of Medical Services for
Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Hated Right-Wingers

Nucatola railed against the “right-wing” Bush administration in a California local newspaper op-ed in 2007.

Disgraced Planned Parenthood Official Works For White House Staff…Her ‘Right-Wing’ Hatred EXPOSED
Patrick Howley
Political Reporter
12:47 AM 07/17/2015 display

Disgraced Planned Parenthood Official s White House Links The Daily Caller

The bitter hatred against right-wing politics did not exist before Roe v. Wade. Conversely, the opposition to Communism during the so-called McCarthy Era was nowhere near the hatred liberals display in defense of killing babies.

NOTE: Liberals rail against war in defense of the country as a way to show that they love life. Concern for a woman’s health pardons everything they do.

No conservative would bring the kind of people this president brought into the White House, and into his administration. No underworld contract killer ever earned the amount of money the Chicago sewer rat pays them to kill baby. And that is not counting the tax dollars Deborah Nucatola et al. rake in from Planned Parenthood.


The Daily Caller has inquired as to the level of compensation that Nucatola currently earns at the nonprofit.​

The Daily Caller did not post what they learned if anything. The sad truth is that a loss of income from abortion is the only thing that will penetrate the hatred people like Deborah Nucatola have for life.

Emotional collectivism

Liberals always preach collectivism. They tell us about the benefits of multicultural garbage, but they never mention the carnage Socialism/Communism does to a nation’s collective emotional well-being. Speaking for myself, I cry every time I learn about a new brutal act Democrats perform on infants. How much emotional damage did they do to me, and to more than half of the population? I guess emotional is not covered by collectivism.

A long time ago, I thought to myself —— suppose my mother aborted me. What inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart. I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey.

Finally, science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so Democrats can hear them.


'god' heard the screems of millions of men, women, and children who were led into gas chambers and gassed to death. And did nothing. Or the screams of hundreds of thousands men, women, and children who were taken from their homes, stripped naked, and led to deep pits, lined up 4 at a time, and shot in the back of the head while the rest watched, waiting for their turn. And did nothing. 'god' watches now as thousands are beheaded, burned alive, raped, tortured, mutilated, and enslaved. And does nothing.

Take your self-righteous 'my god' crap and shove it in your a@#. Your god apparently doesn't get involved anywhere ever for any reason. If he exists, what good is he?

And on the day 'christians' have donated enough money to save the 20,000 children that die every day right now, I may have to rethink your motives.

Until then you don't give a shit about children. You use them as political fodder and that's all.

Wow you sound a tad bit crazy. What's with the god reference?
 
You are lying.

What, exactly am I lying about?

Mindless ad hom from your emotional meltdown fails to offer a compelling argument.

I'm not the one trying to force "strange women" to give birth to babies that they don't want.

More emotion laden demagoguery devoid of rational thought.

The reason you cannot construct a reasoned argument and must resort to a childish tantrum is simply that you have no reasoned argument.

My position is that if you seek to deprive others of life - which is what you demand - then a civilized society must have a system of judicial review to ensure that the rights of the victim are protected. You seek to deprive others of life - make your case before a judge in each instance.

That would be people like you. You don't care about those women or those babies. That is a cop out and nothing more. You seek a society where you can force women to live by your religious views.

Yes, mindless ad hom is the best you can do. Rational thought is not something that you engage in.

You are getting too emotional, relax. Try to allow some rational thought in there through all of your tantrum.

In a perfect world abortion wouldn't be necessary, but this isn't and never will be a perfect world. I'd prefer there were no abortions but that would require forcing my will on women.

You not only want to do that you want the government to force it's will on women. The Supreme Court says sorry Charlie, you aren't forcing anyone to do anything.

So, stop spending all this time posting on the internet and go save the children that are already here that need your help.

Or ignore them.

You have choice.

Says the dude who is emoting all over the thread. Yuck.
 
You are lying.

What, exactly am I lying about?

Mindless ad hom from your emotional meltdown fails to offer a compelling argument.

I'm not the one trying to force "strange women" to give birth to babies that they don't want.

More emotion laden demagoguery devoid of rational thought.

The reason you cannot construct a reasoned argument and must resort to a childish tantrum is simply that you have no reasoned argument.

My position is that if you seek to deprive others of life - which is what you demand - then a civilized society must have a system of judicial review to ensure that the rights of the victim are protected. You seek to deprive others of life - make your case before a judge in each instance.

That would be people like you. You don't care about those women or those babies. That is a cop out and nothing more. You seek a society where you can force women to live by your religious views.

Yes, mindless ad hom is the best you can do. Rational thought is not something that you engage in.

You are getting too emotional, relax. Try to allow some rational thought in there through all of your tantrum.

In a perfect world abortion wouldn't be necessary, but this isn't and never will be a perfect world. I'd prefer there were no abortions but that would require forcing my will on women.

You not only want to do that you want the government to force it's will on women. The Supreme Court says sorry Charlie, you aren't forcing anyone to do anything.

So, stop spending all this time posting on the internet and go save the children that are already here that need your help.

Or ignore them.

You have choice.

Sorry, you don't get to dictate to us what causes we embrace. You go ahead and rally for baby killing. We'll continue to fight the exploitation and abuse of women and children.
 
It is hard for me to understand how selling baby parts justifies hating right-wingers:

nucatola.jpg

Deborah Nucatola
is Senior Director of Medical Services for
Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Hated Right-Wingers

Nucatola railed against the “right-wing” Bush administration in a California local newspaper op-ed in 2007.

Disgraced Planned Parenthood Official Works For White House Staff…Her ‘Right-Wing’ Hatred EXPOSED
Patrick Howley
Political Reporter
12:47 AM 07/17/2015 display

Disgraced Planned Parenthood Official s White House Links The Daily Caller

The bitter hatred against right-wing politics did not exist before Roe v. Wade. Conversely, the opposition to Communism during the so-called McCarthy Era was nowhere near the hatred liberals display in defense of killing babies.

NOTE: Liberals rail against war in defense of the country as a way to show that they love life. Concern for a woman’s health pardons everything they do.

No conservative would bring the kind of people this president brought into the White House, and into his administration. No underworld contract killer ever earned the amount of money the Chicago sewer rat pays them to kill baby. And that is not counting the tax dollars Deborah Nucatola et al. rake in from Planned Parenthood.


The Daily Caller has inquired as to the level of compensation that Nucatola currently earns at the nonprofit.​

The Daily Caller did not post what they learned if anything. The sad truth is that a loss of income from abortion is the only thing that will penetrate the hatred people like Deborah Nucatola have for life.

Emotional collectivism

Liberals always preach collectivism. They tell us about the benefits of multicultural garbage, but they never mention the carnage Socialism/Communism does to a nation’s collective emotional well-being. Speaking for myself, I cry every time I learn about a new brutal act Democrats perform on infants. How much emotional damage did they do to me, and to more than half of the population? I guess emotional is not covered by collectivism.

A long time ago, I thought to myself —— suppose my mother aborted me. What inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart. I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey.

Finally, science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so Democrats can hear them.


'god' heard the screems of millions of men, women, and children who were led into gas chambers and gassed to death. And did nothing. Or the screams of hundreds of thousands men, women, and children who were taken from their homes, stripped naked, and led to deep pits, lined up 4 at a time, and shot in the back of the head while the rest watched, waiting for their turn. And did nothing. 'god' watches now as thousands are beheaded, burned alive, raped, tortured, mutilated, and enslaved. And does nothing.

Take your self-righteous 'my god' crap and shove it in your a@#. Your god apparently doesn't get involved anywhere ever for any reason. If he exists, what good is he?

And on the day 'christians' have donated enough money to save the 20,000 children that die every day right now, I may have to rethink your motives.

Until then you don't give a shit about children. You use them as political fodder and that's all.
God did answer to the Gas Chambers............A Christian Nation, the United States, kicked Hitlers ass...........Even though we used the Ruskies to aid us..............as they had a hell of a fight too.............Ether way.................Good versus evil fight all the time in the history of the World..........................and EVIL LOST..........now didn't it....................

To the rest of your rant...........Late term abortion and partial birth abortion are an OBAMINATION................Period.........I've seen some of the videos and they make me sick to damned stomach.............anyone who could watch that and not be moved by it.................I question their SANITY..............

The selling of organs from partial birth abortions is SICKENING................Crushing the skull of a baby that in a week when born..............It would be Murder to kill the baby.......but 1 hour before birth it's OK......................

It's Insane, and those who agree.............if the shoe fits.
 
[
You are getting too emotional, relax. Try to allow some rational thought in there through all of your tantrum.

In a perfect world abortion wouldn't be necessary, but this isn't and never will be a perfect world. I'd prefer there were no abortions but that would require forcing my will on women.

You not only want to do that you want the government to force it's will on women. The Supreme Court says sorry Charlie, you aren't forcing anyone to do anything.

So, stop spending all this time posting on the internet and go save the children that are already here that need your help.

Or ignore them.

You have choice.

You know I am but what are you?

Excellent argument, sploogy...
 
'god' heard the screems of millions of men, women, and children who were led into gas chambers and gassed to death. And did nothing. Or the screams of hundreds of thousands men, women, and children who were taken from their homes, stripped naked, and led to deep pits, lined up 4 at a time, and shot in the back of the head while the rest watched, waiting for their turn. And did nothing. 'god' watches now as thousands are beheaded, burned alive, raped, tortured, mutilated, and enslaved. And does nothing.

Take your self-righteous 'my god' crap and shove it in your a@#. Your god apparently doesn't get involved anywhere ever for any reason. If he exists, what good is he?

And on the day 'christians' have donated enough money to save the 20,000 children that die every day right now, I may have to rethink your motives.

Until then you don't give a shit about children. You use them as political fodder and that's all.
God did answer to the Gas Chambers............A Christian Nation, the United States, kicked Hitlers ass...........Even though we used the Ruskies to aid us..............as they had a hell of a fight too.............Ether way.................Good versus evil fight all the time in the history of the World..........................and EVIL LOST..........now didn't it....................

To the rest of your rant...........Late term abortion and partial birth abortion are an OBAMINATION................Period.........I've seen some of the videos and they make me sick to damned stomach.............anyone who could watch that and not be moved by it.................I question their SANITY..............

The selling of organs from partial birth abortions is SICKENING................Crushing the skull of a baby that in a week when born..............It would be Murder to kill the baby.......but 1 hour before birth it's OK......................

It's Insane, and those who agree.............if the shoe fits.[/QUOTE]

Wow do you have a constructed answer for everything. And you lump everyone that doesn't hold your exact view as all being worse evil than the devil. Sorry the world is far more complicated, you'll have to revise your us vs them view of everything.

As I said it would be great if there were no need for abortion of any kind. And I think personally a child the day before birth is also a child. And the day before. There is a spectrum along the way. At conception no way. It is a single cell and continues as a lump of cells to a certain point. And no aborted fetuses should not be 'sold'. So there is common ground.

But then the question becomes how do you force a woman to give up control of her own body. Its a dicey proposition. Especially when in the case of rape and incest. You can't think yourself human and want to force a woman to carry a rapists baby to term. But there are people that are against choice that think a woman SHOULD be forced to carry to term no matter what, including rape and incest. These people are fascists.

It just isn't a simple black and white question, though that is how most people against choice would like it.

And in general why don't you relax. Stop viewing the rest of the world as evil. You know human beings have been having abortions since the beginning of time. Hundreds of thousands of years before Roe v Wade.
 
It's also about punishing women for what they deem to be "irresponsible" behavior, such as having sex before marriage. Although I'm quite sure almost all of them had premarital sex with women who did not end up being their wives.

The most telling thing of all as to their real feelings is how, once a baby is born, they don't care at all about it, it's education, how it will survive, if it is born to parents who don't want it. They only care about forcing their views and religious beliefs upon others. I think this is quite obvious.

Why not let the child be adopted by people who will give them a good life?
 
Planned parenthood just admitted there is much more damning video to follow......asks Justice Dept to prevent it......ooops
 

Forum List

Back
Top