Go Get Them Nick !

[Missourian]

[

"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?

Agenda driven fake news.

 

[bodecea]

The current POTUS is such a petulant and feckless child. No wonder the Republicans can't get enough of him.

#SMHGOP

Of course he cheers for the punk ass bullies....I'm sure he was one. What am I saying? He still is one.

 

[Pogo]

Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.

I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.

I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.

The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.

If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.

And they did no such characterization, anywhere.

READ the actual suit document. Show me anywhere it shows up.

Get it? "Show me"? Missourian? I kill me.

 

[Pogo]

[

"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?

Agenda driven fake news.

Link to that?

 

[basquebromance]

in other news....
Man who dressed up as minstrel and mocked black colleague at work party fined

Is this an allusion to Covington high school?

maybe

 

[Toronado3800]

The current POTUS is such a petulant and feckless child. No wonder the Republicans can't get enough of him.

#SMHGOP

Those kids were done wrong. The Progressive Socialist shill press made sure of it. One day, may those bastards get it back.

Wait, spent 30 years hearing Progressives liked Tariffs which unseated the free market. Aren't the tariff lovers in power now?

 

[BlackFlag]

Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.

I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.

I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.

The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.

If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.

Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.

 

[bodecea]

^ liberals love fake news.

Washington Post is going to lose. The agenda driven Liberal mainstream media can get away with lying about public figures like President Trump, but they absolutely stepped on their collective cranks blatantly lying about a private citizen...even worse, a private citizen who is a minor.

But the libs are pissed because this is going to unconditionally prove Trump correct. Don't see anyone above debating the merits...just baselezsly and blindly lashing out.

They have a bright future ahead, as they are proving themselves well qualified as potential modern "journalist" themselves.

Watch what a centerist liberal has to say:

It will be delightful when the WaPo gets interviews with all the kids bullied in Covington by those punks.

 

[MarcATL]

The Washington Post just about called an innocent high school kid a bigot and a racist and the crazy angry left blames Trump? Get a freaking life.

Again ---- and this invitation has been out there a full MONTH now ---- by all means show the class where the WaPo "just about" did that. Any time, in any article. At all.

Oh and then you can instruct the jury on the legal meaning of "just about".


aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.

If Republicans didn't lie. they'd have NOTHING to say.

 

[Pogo]

Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.

I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.

I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.

The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.

If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.

Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.

And the WaPo didn't "comment" on it anyway. They simply reported what witnesses said about the event.

That's what the suit's exhibits all point to --- QUOTES from people who were there describing what they saw.

Last summer Sean Spicer's attorney tried to make grunting noises about the same thing, threatening to "sue" the Associated Press for passing on a story (not even their original story) about a heckler who came into a Spicer book signing and accused him of racism. Which is also a fact, it happened and it's fully on video. Spicer's attack dog started spewing about how he was going to "sue" AP for passing that on. Needles to say, he never did. Because he can't.

These fascist assholes can whine and stomp their feet all they like but you can't just "sue" people for accurately reporting what someone said. Period.

 

[Missourian]

[

"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?

Agenda driven fake news.

Link to that?

The fake news:

LIST: 24 Pieces of MSM Fake News in 5 Days

The agenda driven media:

(For some reason I can't upload the image, but it is at the link below)

STUDY: 91% of recent network Trump coverage is negative - Washington Post

 

[bodecea]

in other news....
Man who dressed up as minstrel and mocked black colleague at work party fined

Is this an allusion to Covington high school?

I'm quite sure more of these kinds of pictures and evidence is going to come out.....WaPo has the investigative reporters to really go to town about these punks.

 

[Pogo]

[

"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?

Agenda driven fake news.

Link to that?

The fake news:

LIST: 24 Pieces of MSM Fake News in 5 Days

The agenda driven media:

(For some reason I can't upload the image, but it is at the link below)

STUDY: 91% of recent network Trump coverage is negative - Washington Post

You owe Pogo's Law five cents.

No wait, that's two links, I'm gonna double the fine. You owe me a dime.

 

[bodecea]

Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.

I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.

I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.

The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.

If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.

Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.

And the WaPo didn't "comment" on it anyway. They simply reported what witnesses said about the event.

That's what the suit's exhibits all point to --- QUOTES from people who were there describing what they saw.

Last summer Sean Spicer's attorney tried to make grunting noises about the same thing, threatening to "sue" the Associated Press for passing on a story (not even their original story) about a heckler who came into a Spicer book signing and accused him of racism. Which is also a fact, it happened and it's fully on video. Spicer's attack dog started spewing about how he was going to "sue" AP for passing that on. Needles to say, he never did. Because he can't.

These fascist assholes can whine and stomp their feet all they like but you can't just "sue" people for accurately reporting what someone said. Period.

I wonder why tiny donnie was never sued for this:

 

[bodecea]

Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.

I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.

I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.

The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.

If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.

Wanna bet?

 

[bodecea]

The Washington Post just about called an innocent high school kid a bigot and a racist and the crazy angry left blames Trump? Get a freaking life.

Again ---- and this invitation has been out there a full MONTH now ---- by all means show the class where the WaPo "just about" did that. Any time, in any article. At all.

Oh and then you can instruct the jury on the legal meaning of "just about".


aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.

I too want to see whitehall's evidence and how "just about" fits in legally.

 

[bendog]

The current POTUS is such a petulant and feckless child. No wonder the Republicans can't get enough of him.

#SMHGOP

Those kids were done wrong. The Progressive Socialist shill press made sure of it. One day, may those bastards get it back.

Nick and his RW Catholic

maybe Trump will give the kid some pointers on how to lose lawsuits.

'Go get them Nick': Trump cheers on Kentucky student suing the Washington Post for $250 million

Nick's parents want to stay in the news and get a payout.

And why would any parent or any school send children to a political event hundreds of miles from home during a school year?

 

[Pogo]

The Washington Post just about called an innocent high school kid a bigot and a racist and the crazy angry left blames Trump? Get a freaking life.

Again ---- and this invitation has been out there a full MONTH now ---- by all means show the class where the WaPo "just about" did that. Any time, in any article. At all.

Oh and then you can instruct the jury on the legal meaning of "just about".


aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.

I too want to see whitehall's evidence and how "just about" fits in legally.

I don't think even Judge Judy would tolerate a "justabout".

Sounds like something you do in Australia.

 

[Pogo]

Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.

I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.

I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.

The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.

If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.

Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.

And the WaPo didn't "comment" on it anyway. They simply reported what witnesses said about the event.

That's what the suit's exhibits all point to --- QUOTES from people who were there describing what they saw.

Last summer Sean Spicer's attorney tried to make grunting noises about the same thing, threatening to "sue" the Associated Press for passing on a story (not even their original story) about a heckler who came into a Spicer book signing and accused him of racism. Which is also a fact, it happened and it's fully on video. Spicer's attack dog started spewing about how he was going to "sue" AP for passing that on. Needles to say, he never did. Because he can't.

These fascist assholes can whine and stomp their feet all they like but you can't just "sue" people for accurately reporting what someone said. Period.

I wonder why tiny donnie was never sued for this: View attachment 246882

Or for calling the settlement for imprisoning five people for a crime they did not commit a "disgrace" and the "heist of the century".

How orangely ironic, Rump accusing somebody ELSE of a "heist"....

 

[Missourian]

"Defamation of character occurs when someone makes a false statement about you that causes you some type of harm. The statement must be published (meaning some third party must have heard it), false, and it must result in harm, usually to the reputation. Those essential components of a defamation claim are fairly straightforward. "


Defamation of Character Lawsuits: Proving Actual Harm

I'd say...if the articles are written with qualifiers such as "allegedly" and "claimed" and "according to" and "appeared"...the Washington Post wouldn't be getting sued.

As soon as they claimed one time in a statement that something definitively happened that didn't...they are guilty of defamation.

Just like the Smollett Hoax...they thought this was a slam dunk. It fit the narrative they intentionally project. I think this time it is going to bite them in the ass...and their wallet.