Rshermr
VIP Member
And again, crusader, you have no ability to understand the english language. So, here is your drivel:LNo proof, of course, eh Crusader. No economist believed GM or Chrysler would have come out of a managed bankrupcy. Just politicians. And apparently they never lie, if they are repubs, eh crusader."And if Mitt Romney had had his way, none of this would be happening, because without the federal bailout he so bluntly opposed, GM would have gone under."
The level of complete, fundamental economic ignorance on the Left is absolutely mind boggling. Then again you have to be an idiot in order to embrace an economic philosophy that comes with a 100% guaranteed fail, and is so awful even the ChiComs and Vietnamese have abandoned it in favor of free enterprise
China and Vietnam. Really. Fraid that just won't pass the giggle test.
Do you ever say anything that makes any sense at all to other than other cons???
dipshit.
Bullshit! Total fucking bullshit!!
GM needed to restructure its labor and pension costs and other liabilities, that's why it filed a Reorganization bankruptcy.
GM filed for reorganization, not liquidation.
Repeat after me: GM filed for reorganization, not liquidation.
Can you say that? Do you understand any of the words?
Bullshit! Total fucking bullshit!!
GM needed to restructure its labor and pension costs and other liabilities, that's why it filed a Reorganization bankruptcy.
GM filed for reorganization, not liquidation.
Repeat after me: GM filed for reorganization, not liquidation.
Can you say that? Do you understand any of the words?
Sounds to me like you may be having a coronary. And yes, I do understand the words. What your problem is me poor con retard, is that you think that because they FILED for reorganization did not mean that they had any chance at ACCOMPLISHING reorganization. Most companies that file for reorganization under Chapter 11 bankruptcy procedures do not come out as a company. Assets are sold, pieces of the company may be sold, but no company remains. It all depends on the state of the company. And in the case of GM, there was no possibility of coming out as a working company. They, and Chrysler, and hundreds of other companies would be history. Which, apparently, would have made you happy.
Should you care to understand, you could look at the history from a non partial standpoint. But then, it would not look good for you con dogma. dipshit.
So yes, Crusader, I do indeed understand your words. And they are, indeed, bullshit. Just as you said.