OohPooPahDoo
Gold Member
LOL! You thought by "show us a copy" I meant "give me links"Climate Change Emails Reveal Rigged 'Consensus' - WSJ.comGuess you missed that part in the Climategate emails, huh, where they talk about shopping for reviewers.
I understand. You can't sin against the Cult. Apostasy is frowned upon.
I did miss it. Maybe you can show us a copy....
but I doubt it. I've learned on this message board that skeptics like to talk about the "CimateGate' emails, but they rarely like to quote them, and when they do, rarely the entire email and its context.
Good synopsis (with in-context quotes and links to the emails in question) here:
Climategate 2 and Corruption of Peer Review – Part II | New Zealand Climate Change
That's funny.
No - I meant you're certainly not going to put a copy of an email on this message board, highlight parts of it, and discuss with us what you think those parts means and why you think that. You would never do that. Primarily because you can't think for yourself. All you can do is post links.
Last edited: