Globalists Unite Behind Hillary

[Tehon]

By fair you mean regulated.

That depends on what is involved. I'd be a bit wary about high tech trade with certain countries (though some as we have seen over the years are not).

There is no shame in wanting to regulate commerce. Free markets are a fairy tale.
Trump is right in principle but not in the specifics of what he proposes to "fix" things. He has run enough business projects into the ground to raise warning flags about his "know how".

Which businesses did Trump run into the ground?

Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts

Where?

It was the name of the company that he crashed dumbass.
Where

 

[owebo]

That depends on what is involved. I'd be a bit wary about high tech trade with certain countries (though some as we have seen over the years are not).

There is no shame in wanting to regulate commerce. Free markets are a fairy tale.
Trump is right in principle but not in the specifics of what he proposes to "fix" things. He has run enough business projects into the ground to raise warning flags about his "know how".

Which businesses did Trump run into the ground?

Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts

Where?

It was the name of the company that he crashed dumbass.
Where

Where? As in location you fucktard liberal....

 

[Tehon]

There is no shame in wanting to regulate commerce. Free markets are a fairy tale.
Trump is right in principle but not in the specifics of what he proposes to "fix" things. He has run enough business projects into the ground to raise warning flags about his "know how".

Which businesses did Trump run into the ground?

Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts

Where?

It was the name of the company that he crashed dumbass.
Where

Where? As in location you fucktard liberal....

It was the name of his publicly traded company dipshit, it held hotels that were located in various locations but most prominently Atlantic City, NJ..

 

[Desperado]

Globalist += Anti-American
Hiliary = Globalist
Therefore
Hiliary is Anti-American

 

[Neotrotsky]

GLOBALISTS UNITE BEHIND HILLARY

 

[Neotrotsky]

Globalist += Anti-American
Hiliary = Globalist
Therefore
Hiliary is Anti-American

 

[kaz]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

Never took an economics class, did you?

 

[Tehon]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

Never took an economics class, did you?

If you have something to say, say it.

 

[Neotrotsky]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

they do

please explain how we have Free markets now?

this should be good

 

[saveliberty]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

I understand you have no concept of economics, so I 'll simply say it is only a world wide free market system when there are not trade agreements, tariffs or trade barriers. Maybe we can discuss your bad experiences in first grade?

 

[Neotrotsky]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

I understand you have no concept of economics, so I 'll simply say it is only a world wide free market system when there are not trade agreements, tariffs or trade barriers. Maybe we can discuss your bad experiences in first grade?

indeed

deals and trade pacts set up to protect and aid
groups that gave money to Hillary or the Clinton Foundation
it not Free Trade

unless one thinks crony capitalism is free trade

 

[kaz]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

Never took an economics class, did you?

If you have something to say, say it.

You don't know what you are talking about. Globalists and free traders are completely different. Globalists support government policies driving global integration. Free marketers want government to neither help nor hinder globalism, we just want government to stay out of it.

As for opposing free markets, you never took an economics class, did you?

 

[Tehon]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

I understand you have no concept of economics, so I 'll simply say it is only a world wide free market system when there are not trade agreements, tariffs or trade barriers. Maybe we can discuss your bad experiences in first grade?

Trade agreements are intended to remove trade barriers such as tariffs.

 

[saveliberty]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

I understand you have no concept of economics, so I 'll simply say it is only a world wide free market system when there are not trade agreements, tariffs or trade barriers. Maybe we can discuss your bad experiences in first grade?

Trade agreements are intended to remove trade barriers such as tariffs.

No, they create unequal or favored status moron.

 

[Neotrotsky]

while making Friends of Hillary rich

 

[kaz]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

I understand you have no concept of economics, so I 'll simply say it is only a world wide free market system when there are not trade agreements, tariffs or trade barriers. Maybe we can discuss your bad experiences in first grade?

Trade agreements are intended to remove trade barriers such as tariffs.

No, they create unequal or favored status moron.

I agree, we should just remove all barriers to trade on our end. Government should help only in so far as removing barriers to trade on the other sides. For example, anyone we protect or give foreign aid to should have the choice of opening their markets to our companies or we leave

 

[Neotrotsky]

GLOBALISTS UNITE BEHIND HILLARY

 

[Tehon]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

Never took an economics class, did you?

If you have something to say, say it.

You don't know what you are talking about. Globalists and free traders are completely different. Globalists support government policies driving global integration. Free marketers want government to neither help nor hinder globalism, we just want government to stay out of it.

As for opposing free markets, you never took an economics class, did you?

You are free to define globalist any way you like. As my comment relates to the article linked in the OP, the globalist and the free trader is the same. The globalist promotes trade liberalization which is by definition a freeing of the markets.

 

[kaz]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

Never took an economics class, did you?

If you have something to say, say it.

You don't know what you are talking about. Globalists and free traders are completely different. Globalists support government policies driving global integration. Free marketers want government to neither help nor hinder globalism, we just want government to stay out of it.

As for opposing free markets, you never took an economics class, did you?

You are free to define globalist any way you like. As my comment relates to the article linked in the OP, the globalist and the free trader is the same. The globalist promotes trade liberalization which is by definition a freeing of the markets.

That's what a globalist is, you are NOT free to make up your own definitions for words.

Globalists use trade for government policy. They make those deals to reward their friends and punish their enemies. They pick winners and losers and protect industries they don't want open.

Free traders just want free trade.

The name clearly shows the objective. I'm not a globalist, but I am totally a free trader. Hence my solution to just open our economic borders and keep government out of it. Globalists would never, ever agree to that

 

[buckeye45_73]

http://www.economist.com/news/leade.../ednew/n/bl/n/20160728n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/n/n


This article alone should be enough to sink Clinton, but I believe there are too many who buy into this globalist tripe. Hope that does not prove to be the case.

It used to be that the entire republican base believed in free markets. It's nice to see that some of you have stopped drinking the kool aid.

I understand you have no concept of economics, so I 'll simply say it is only a world wide free market system when there are not trade agreements, tariffs or trade barriers. Maybe we can discuss your bad experiences in first grade?

Trade agreements are intended to remove trade barriers such as tariffs.

True, but that's not all what a globalist is.....only a small part.