Globalism vs. Nationalism

[Votto]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

 

[Tehon]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

 

[expat_panama]

...the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism...

This is true, and it's crazy because both nationalism and globalism are good. We need both. When the President spoke at the United Nations and said--

...as president of the United States I will always put America first just like you as the leaders of your countries will always and should always put your country's first......

--the world's leaders APPLAUDED because they all understood we don't make the world strong by making nations weak. We can only have the total community become strong when all members become strong.

 

[Tehon]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

If the wealth produced by this AMERICAN SOCIETY is extracted OUTSIDE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY by soulless global conglomerates -- the whole talk about "nationalism" is just something globalists tell low IQ people to make them feel better.

Meanwhile, everything Trump has done policy wise has been and will be the same policies republicans have always done.

 

[Rustic]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

Don lemon is a retard, his whole show is about hate and embracing it.
It’s a collective always fucks over the individual no two ways about it

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

and lets be clear what "nationalism" is really about -- it is identity politics for white supremacists who can't be overtly racist -- so they have to dress up in the guise of "nationalism" -- which is NOT simply just putting America first unless they can point to me what "POLICIES" are putting ALL Americans first and not just the top 10% of Americans -- because that top 10% are very much in favor of globalism

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

If the wealth produced by this AMERICAN SOCIETY is extracted OUTSIDE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY by soulless global conglomerates -- the whole talk about "nationalism" is just something globalists tell low IQ people to make them feel better.

Meanwhile, everything Trump has done policy wise has been and will be the same policies republicans have always done.

What is a "soulless global conglomerate"? Explain the aforementioned "extraction process".

 

[Rustic]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

Redistribution then wealth equity is a fucked up idea, but then again the collective has always been fucked up.
Only thing worse than nationalism is globalism

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

If the wealth produced by this AMERICAN SOCIETY is extracted OUTSIDE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY by soulless global conglomerates -- the whole talk about "nationalism" is just something globalists tell low IQ people to make them feel better.

Meanwhile, everything Trump has done policy wise has been and will be the same policies republicans have always done.

What is a "soulless global conglomerate"? Explain the aforementioned "extraction process".

You probably believe that ExxonMobil is an America first company, if so, that is sad...but they are not -- so can you tell me why tax payers should be subsidizing a company who has made the highest profits of any corporation in human history?

Why should taxpayers be subsidizing any large global conglomerate? Amazon, Exxon, etc?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

If the wealth produced by this AMERICAN SOCIETY is extracted OUTSIDE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY by soulless global conglomerates -- the whole talk about "nationalism" is just something globalists tell low IQ people to make them feel better.

Meanwhile, everything Trump has done policy wise has been and will be the same policies republicans have always done.

What is a "soulless global conglomerate"? Explain the aforementioned "extraction process".

You probably believe that ExxonMobil is an America first company, if so, that is sad...but they are not -- so can you tell me why tax payers should be subsidizing a company who has made the highest profits of any corporation in human history?

Why should taxpayers be subsidizing any large global conglomerate? Amazon, Exxon, etc?

Companies are not required to be "America First". Never were. Create a business-friendly national climate, and they will park in your lot, pay your fees, and produce.

Do you understand the concept of investment and return?

"He who controls the spice controls the Universe".

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

If the wealth produced by this AMERICAN SOCIETY is extracted OUTSIDE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY by soulless global conglomerates -- the whole talk about "nationalism" is just something globalists tell low IQ people to make them feel better.

Meanwhile, everything Trump has done policy wise has been and will be the same policies republicans have always done.

What is a "soulless global conglomerate"? Explain the aforementioned "extraction process".

You probably believe that ExxonMobil is an America first company, if so, that is sad...but they are not -- so can you tell me why tax payers should be subsidizing a company who has made the highest profits of any corporation in human history?

Why should taxpayers be subsidizing any large global conglomerate? Amazon, Exxon, etc?

Companies are not required to be "America First". Never were. Create a business-friendly national climate, and they will park in your lot, pay your fees, and produce.

Do you understand the concept of investment and return?

"He who controls the spice controls the Universe".

I like how you didn't answer my question...

Why are we subsidizing large global conglomerates?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

What is "social wealth"?

If the wealth produced by this AMERICAN SOCIETY is extracted OUTSIDE OF AMERICAN SOCIETY by soulless global conglomerates -- the whole talk about "nationalism" is just something globalists tell low IQ people to make them feel better.

Meanwhile, everything Trump has done policy wise has been and will be the same policies republicans have always done.

What is a "soulless global conglomerate"? Explain the aforementioned "extraction process".

You probably believe that ExxonMobil is an America first company, if so, that is sad...but they are not -- so can you tell me why tax payers should be subsidizing a company who has made the highest profits of any corporation in human history?

Why should taxpayers be subsidizing any large global conglomerate? Amazon, Exxon, etc?

Companies are not required to be "America First". Never were. Create a business-friendly national climate, and they will park in your lot, pay your fees, and produce.

Do you understand the concept of investment and return?

"He who controls the spice controls the Universe".

I like how you didn't answer my question...

Why are we subsidizing large global conglomerates?

I see you missed the investment part.

 

[Tehon]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

You will never put that genie back in the bottle. Certainly not when half the time you are working to promote the benefits of wealth acquisition. Tax breaks and the like. It undermines your cause.

So what's wrong with wealth acquisition, tax breaks and the like?

Are you ... like ... beggared, beggarly, broke, destitute, dirt-poor, down-and-out, famished, hard up, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needful, needy, pauperized, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken, skint or threadbare?

If social wealth is spread among society then nothing. When it accrues disproportionately into the hands of people with no emotional bonds to the society they live, then the idea of nation is weakened.

What is "social wealth"?

It is the wealth created by society. No one creates wealth inside a bubble.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Did anyone know that using the term "globalist" may get you labeled a racist?

Don Lemon: The Term 'Globalist' Is Racist, Anti-Semitic

I think most know that being labeled a nationalist automatically is translated as being a "white nationalist" and a racist.

But is this accurate?

Pick up any history book and read how they describe the formation of America. They describe how America as a country persecuted the American Indian, all in the name of nationalism. But what they DON'T do is present how America was formed due to the globalist influences of both England and France. For you see, war after war was fought in America between the two super powers, all in the name of globalism. In fact, slavery was brought to the America's by Spain.

And what of immigration? Should all immigrants from abroad be welcomed in to any given country? Just ask the American Indian.

Isn't it funny how all school text books are ideologically written to attack nationalism while ignoring the evils of globalism?

So both the media and academia are against nationalism and for globalism, but do you know why? It's because if you really want to know who is running things, the best way to find out is to find out who you cannot criticize.

Links to Dictionary.com:

Nationalism: an extreme form of this, especially marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries.

Globalism: the operation or planning of economic and foreign policy on a global basis.

So sorry to burst your balloon, but trying to redefine words to meet your agenda won't work.