Old Rocks
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Yep, the popular press ran with scientific fringe elements. They never talked to real scientists, and still don't.
You IDIOT! Where the fuck do you think the press came up with the idea of global cooling? Did they fucking pull it out of thin air? They talked to fucking scientist and reported on the consensus, the exact same way they do today. If you want to insists that there was no consensus back then then you will have to admit one does not exist now.
Why is it you ignore facts simply because they disagree with your theories? The consensus existed back then, and it went the other way 50 years before that, and back again to cooling if you go back another 50 years. But don't worry, that was just the popular press then to, and the real scientists always believed in global warming.
A consensus is 7 papers against 42? Get your head out of your ass, boy!
In the last ten years the real consensus, hundreds of papers against maybe 1 or 2 in scientific journals,.
Wow, you searched decades worth of scientific literature and found less than 50 papers about climate change, and expect me to back down because the ones you found support your position and not mine? Keep dreaming, and I think I owe an apology to idiots. I hope we are both around in another 50 years when you try to argue that there was no scientific consensus supporting global warming in 2000.
Proving yourself to be a real dumbass, Quantum. The period that was in question was from 1970 to 1979. And in peer reviewed journals, there were about 50 papers directly concerned with warming or cooling climate, on a global scale, published.
And today, there is an overwhelming consensus in all fields of endevour in science that we are experiancing rapid warming caused by the burning of fossil fuels.