Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Fossil fuels are beneficial to the environment. They supply CO2 that plants need to live. The planet is getting greener because of fossil fuels and our farmland is becoming more productive, which means we need less of it.Explicit subsidies accounted for only 8 percent of the total. The remaining 92 percent were implicit subsidies, which took the form of tax breaks or, to a much larger degree, health and environmental damages that were not priced into the cost of fossil fuels, according to the analysis.
LOL! Moron.
I've seen the progs try to pull this scam numerous times in the past.If you were a mine or a well, you'd have a tax deduction.
Just like if you were a depreciating piece of equipment or building.
Like every business deducts expenses. Not a subsidy.
The 8% is also bullshit.Gee whizzers, so that is only $492 billion. And if I hit someone else's vehicle and damage it, I am expected to pay that damage, whether I have insurance or not. But the damage that the use of fossil fuels does to forests and people are expected to by payed for by the victims. Gotta love the ethics you embrace.
You mean real subsidies, as opposed to the imaginary ones that progs makeup..
I've seen the progs try to pull this scam numerous times in the past.
There's also the fact that they are fond of lying.They're really bad at math and accounting.
After youThen try posting something that reflects intelligence and surprise us all.
Now little miss fuck finger, the plants did just fine without us burning fossil fuels for several hundred million years. I am sure that the forests in Oregon and California are so much more productive for the fact that several thousand square miles of forest have burnt because of the increased heat and drought that are the result of burning those fossil fuels.Fossil fuels are beneficial to the environment. They supply CO2 that plants need to live. The planet is getting greener because of fossil fuels and our farmland is becoming more productive, which means we need less of it.
Actually, that's not true. Over the last few million years CO2 levels have lowered to the point where it can barely support plant growth.Now little miss fuck finger, the plants did just fine without us burning fossil fuels for several hundred million years.
I am sure that the forests in Oregon and California are so much more productive for the fact that several thousand square miles of forest have burnt because of the increased heat and drought that are the result of burning those fossil fuels.
LOL What a doofus you are. Barely support plant life? Have you ever been where the ground was not covered in concrete? 3000 year old Sequoias spent most of their lives at 280 ppm of CO2. The fires in Oregon and Australia were the result of drought and very extreme winds. Both the result of a changing climate due to the increased GHG's in the atmosphere. That is what the scientists are telling us, and that is what most citizens of the US now accept. Of course, the rightwingnuts, the kissers of the orange ass, cannot accept the truth. LOLActually, that's not true. Over the last few million years CO2 levels have lowered to the point where it can barely support plant growth.
They burnt in Oregon and California because of improper forest management. They burnt in Australia because of arson.
LOL What a doofus you are. Barely support plant life? Have you ever been where the ground was not covered in concrete? 3000 year old Sequoias spent most of their lives at 280 ppm of CO2. The fires in Oregon and Australia were the result of drought and very extreme winds. Both the result of a changing climate due to the increased GHG's in the atmosphere. That is what the scientists are telling us, and that is what most citizens of the US now accept. Of course, the rightwingnuts, the kissers of the orange ass, cannot accept the truth. LOL
LOL You put more energy into the atmosphere, you will get a more energetic atmosphere. Pretty straightforward. And if you hot and dry comes with a very high wind, well, one lightning strike, and you have hell on Earth. In fact, you sometimes do not even need hot, just dry and a high wind, as we saw last month in Colorado and Kansas. Of course, according to you people, that happens every December, right?The fires in Oregon and Australia were the result of drought and very extreme winds. Both the result of a changing climate due to the increased GHG's in the atmosphere.
How hot, dry and windy would it be at 400 ppm? At 350 ppm? Link?
LOL You put more energy into the atmosphere, you will get a more energetic atmosphere. Pretty straightforward. And if you hot and dry comes with a very high wind, well, one lightning strike, and you have hell on Earth. In fact, you sometimes do not even need hot, just dry and a high wind, as we saw last month in Colorado and Kansas. Of course, according to you people, that happens every December, right?
How many houses were burned up in one day in Colorado by a wildfire in December in the last 1000 years?You put more energy into the atmosphere, you will get a more energetic atmosphere. Pretty straightforward.
Right.
How hot, dry and windy would it be at 400 ppm? At 350 ppm?
Of course, according to you people, that happens every December, right?
How many times did it happen in the last 1,000 Decembers?
How many houses were burned up in one day in Colorado by a wildfire in December in the last 1000 years?
Wrong, turd. In Australia, It was established beyond doubt that the fires were all the result of arson. The forest fires in Oregon would have been small but the failure to clear away brush near populated areas made them into huge problems. The fact has been documented over and over. However, we understand that you enviro-wakos refuse to accept truth.LOL What a doofus you are. Barely support plant life? Have you ever been where the ground was not covered in concrete? 3000 year old Sequoias spent most of their lives at 280 ppm of CO2. The fires in Oregon and Australia were the result of drought and very extreme winds. Both the result of a changing climate due to the increased GHG's in the atmosphere. That is what the scientists are telling us, and that is what most citizens of the US now accept. Of course, the rightwingnuts, the kissers of the orange ass, cannot accept the truth. LOL
You fucked up liar! There were over 1000 square miles of forest burned in Oregon in 2021.Wrong, turd. In Australia, It was established beyond doubt that the fires were all the result of arson. The forest fires in Oregon would have been small but the failure to clear away brush near populated areas made them into huge problems. The fact has been documented over and over. However, we understand that you enviro-wakos refuse to accept truth.
You are such a lying POS.Wrong, turd. In Australia, It was established beyond doubt that the fires were all the result of arson. The forest fires in Oregon would have been small but the failure to clear away brush near populated areas made them into huge problems. The fact has been documented over and over. However, we understand that you enviro-wakos refuse to accept truth.
The CSIRO states that the most common cause of bushfires is lightning and that fires started by people are mostly accidental:Bushfires can originate from both human activity and natural causes with lightning the predominant natural source, accounting for about half of all ignitions in Australia. Fires of human origin currently account for the remainder and are classified as accidental or deliberate.
The NSW RFS reported that the Gospers Mountain fire was started by lightning on 26 October 2019 and ‘burnt through more than 512,000 hectares across the Lithgow, Hawkesbury, Hunter Valley, Cudgegong, Blue Mountains and Central Coast local government areas’.Bushfires are the result of a combination of weather and vegetation (which acts as a fuel for the fire), together with a way for the fire to begin – most commonly due to a lightning strike and sometimes human-influences (mostly accidental such as the use of machinery which produces a spark). Depending on weather conditions, embers can be transported by wind from one location to another, causing new fires or spotting.
Where ?And taxpayers won't be paying for solar either, customers will.
The plants are being built by Private co and investors.
Green stocks/utilities (like Next Era Energy) are building like any other Power Plants.
It's you are are WAY TOO F******** STUPID.
YOU **** MORON. You ************** MORON.
Current traditional Utilities are also building Solar big time
YOU F******* MORON
YOU F******* MORON
`
The sun caused those fires?You fucked up liar! There were over 1000 square miles of forest burned in Oregon in 2021.
Oregon wildfires by the numbers: 826,000 acres, 174 homes ...
https://www.registerguard.com › story › news › 2021/10/09
Oct 9, 2021 — Largest & most expensive wildfires of 2021. 1: Bootleg Fire. Size: 413,717 acres; Cost: $100,900,000; Cause: lightning; Location: 15 miles NW of ...
