Get Used to It: Israel Is Here to Stay

Status
Not open for further replies.
through time nation have been created and destroyed, if you let israel have their own nation, again, then the rest of the colonialism era peoples in Palestine deserve their own nation.
 
colonialism era? you forgot to say WESTERN COLONIALISM I am reminded of my interactions with Indians and Pakistanis starting way back circa 1970 when I first learned that all the world's problems are based on ONE AND ONLY ONE PROGRAM OF "conquest" ie the WESTERN EUROPEAN -----somehow the GLORIOUS AGE OF ISLAMIC CONQUEST-----as nothing but GLORIOUS AND OF GREAT BENEFIT TO MANKIND and---of course -----at it turned out GENGHIS KHAN WAS A GREAT GUY the whole issue that destroyed GOODNESS was the BRITISH EMPIRE-------thanks for the reminder
 
images
 
The agreements ended the official hostilities of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and established Armistice Demarcation Lines between Israeli forces and the forces in Jordanian-held West Bank, also known as the Green Line.

Note: They did not say between Israel and Jordan.

With Egypt

The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.

The armistice demarcation line was drawn for the most part along the 1922 international border between Egypt and Palestine, except near the Mediterranean Sea, where Egypt remained in control of a strip of land along the coast, which became known as the Gaza Strip.

With Lebanon

The armistice line ("Green Line", see also Blue Line (Lebanon)) was drawn along the international boundary between Lebanon and Palestine.[7]

With Jordan

Jordanian forces remained in most positions held by them in the West Bank, particularly East Jerusalem which included the Old City.

In March 1949 as the Iraqi forces withdrew from Palestine and handed over their positions to the smaller Jordanian legion,...

On 15 July when the Israeli Army expelled the population of Wadi Fukin after the village had been transferred to the Israeli-occupied area under the terms of the Armistice Agreement ...

With Syria

Syria withdrew its forces from most of the territories it controlled west of the international border, which became demilitarized zones.

Cease-fire line vs. permanent border

The areas of Palestine not occupied by Israel (the Gaza Strip and West Bank) were occupied by Egypt and Jordan respectively until 1967.

Palestine was divided into three areas of occupation: Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. There was no change to Palestine's international borders. Palestine was occupied but it lost no land in the 1948 war.

What this means is that Israel is a foreign military occupation of Palestine.
 
The agreements ended the official hostilities of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and established Armistice Demarcation Lines between Israeli forces and the forces in Jordanian-held West Bank, also known as the Green Line.

Note: They did not say between Israel and Jordan.









Cease-fire line vs. permanent border

The areas of Palestine not occupied by Israel (the Gaza Strip and West Bank) were occupied by Egypt and Jordan respectively until 1967.

Palestine was divided into three areas of occupation: Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. There was no change to Palestine's international borders. Palestine was occupied but it lost no land in the 1948 war.

What this means is that Israel is a foreign military occupation of Palestine.



Wrong again what it means is that PALESTINE aka JUDEA/ISRAEL which was invaded by the dogs of arabia ------still harbors enclaves of those dogs -----on both its eastern and western aspects The arabian dogs are gathered in parts of Judea which is on the western bank of the Jordan River some of the dogs remained in the JUDEAN holy city of jerusalem as well------on the east the dogs gathered in Gaza------which, in general is not an important land mass to Israel ------but is a strategic advantage to violent criminal aggressors in the west
 
Note: They did not say between Israel and Jordan.











Palestine was divided into three areas of occupation: Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. There was no change to Palestine's international borders. Palestine was occupied but it lost no land in the 1948 war.

What this means is that Israel is a foreign military occupation of Palestine.



Wrong again what it means is that PALESTINE aka JUDEA/ISRAEL which was invaded by the dogs of arabia ------still harbors enclaves of those dogs -----on both its eastern and western aspects The arabian dogs are gathered in parts of Judea which is on the western bank of the Jordan River some of the dogs remained in the JUDEAN holy city of jerusalem as well------on the east the dogs gathered in Gaza------which, in general is not an important land mass to Israel ------but is a strategic advantage to violent criminal aggressors in the west

Where did it say that?
 
What this means is that Israel is a foreign military occupation of Palestine.



Wrong again what it means is that PALESTINE aka JUDEA/ISRAEL which was invaded by the dogs of arabia ------still harbors enclaves of those dogs -----on both its eastern and western aspects The arabian dogs are gathered in parts of Judea which is on the western bank of the Jordan River some of the dogs remained in the JUDEAN holy city of jerusalem as well------on the east the dogs gathered in Gaza------which, in general is not an important land mass to Israel ------but is a strategic advantage to violent criminal aggressors in the west

Where did it say that?


"it" describes the situation of the lands------"it" does not describe the circumstances that led to the situation ------at all
 
Wrong again what it means is that PALESTINE aka JUDEA/ISRAEL which was invaded by the dogs of arabia ------still harbors enclaves of those dogs -----on both its eastern and western aspects The arabian dogs are gathered in parts of Judea which is on the western bank of the Jordan River some of the dogs remained in the JUDEAN holy city of jerusalem as well------on the east the dogs gathered in Gaza------which, in general is not an important land mass to Israel ------but is a strategic advantage to violent criminal aggressors in the west

Where did it say that?


"it" describes the situation of the lands------"it" does not describe the circumstances that led to the situation ------at all

That seemed to be an accurate portrayal of the 1949 armistice agreements.

Is there something specific that you disagree with?
 
Where did it say that?


"it" describes the situation of the lands------"it" does not describe the circumstances that led to the situation ------at all

That seemed to be an accurate portrayal of the 1949 armistice agreements.

Is there something specific that you disagree with?

your bizarre interpretation of the fact of an ARMISTICE as legalizing the theft of PALESTINE ---aka Judea/Israel by the dogs of arabia and rendering them "INDIGENOUS" the dogs of arabia are no more indigenous to palestine aka judea/israel than are the dutch AFRIKAANERS in south africa----or even the SUDANESE ARABS OF KHARTOUM to the subsaharan nation of SUDAN
 
"it" describes the situation of the lands------"it" does not describe the circumstances that led to the situation ------at all

That seemed to be an accurate portrayal of the 1949 armistice agreements.

Is there something specific that you disagree with?

your bizarre interpretation of the fact of an ARMISTICE as legalizing the theft of PALESTINE ---aka Judea/Israel by the dogs of arabia and rendering them "INDIGENOUS" the dogs of arabia are no more indigenous to palestine aka judea/israel than are the dutch AFRIKAANERS in south africa----or even the SUDANESE ARABS OF KHARTOUM to the subsaharan nation of SUDAN

The armistice agreements are legal documents signed by Israel and the surrounding countries. Why do you find faults when they did not?
 
Blah blah blah, Jordan is Palestine. How many Palestines do Arab Muslims want, 20?

IsraelMapReduction1922-mandate_for_palestine.jpg


bmand.gif
 
through time nation have been created and destroyed, if you let israel have their own nation, again, then the rest of the colonialism era peoples in Palestine deserve their own nation.

They don't deserve nothing until they disarm themselves. Hamas, a group that advocates genocide against the Jewish people, teaches their kids to hate, is the main reason the Palestinians don't have their own land. And it will always be like this. Because it's too late, Hamas cannot be trusted.

We gave them Gaza to themselves, and look what they have done ! Imagine if we gave them the Weest Bank too !
 
Israel has 2 mortal enemies

Itself

and false "Friends" like "American Ji - Mad"...gee is he mad................

he is definitely an Al Qa'ida plant

or is that Che Guevara in his lens? Looks a bit like him
 
Last edited:
Blah blah blah, Jordan is Palestine. How many Palestines do Arab Muslims want, 20?

IsraelMapReduction1922-mandate_for_palestine.jpg


bmand.gif

The Jewish Palestine was a British plot that flopped. Britain cut and ran.
Jewish Palestine was a British plot? No, Palestine was a region owned by the Ottomans for 600 years and then the British and the French took control of and many other regions, after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after WWII. The Arabs had jackshit to say about it. Many countries were carved out all of them Arab and Islamic, and one Jewish which comprised of less than 1% of the land. The filthy violent intolerance Arabs couldn't even agree to that and attacked the newly formed state of Israel and got their butts handed to them. They attempted many times later on and STILL got their butts handed to them.
 
Masada 2000, A wank-site for adolescent jewish Wimps

You're mad?


HAHa. ya, you're mad ! :eusa_boohoo:

Oh Sorry, touch a nerve did I?
not really, you're fulla shit and lying as usual. All maps that show a Palestine in the 1920's show exactly the same. I can post at least 20 such maps from different sources. You and your dear leader Adolfi-Nejad need to pull your heads of your Mohammads.
 
colonialism era? you forgot to say WESTERN COLONIALISM I am reminded of my interactions with Indians and Pakistanis starting way back circa 1970 when I first learned that all the world's problems are based on ONE AND ONLY ONE PROGRAM OF "conquest" ie the WESTERN EUROPEAN -----somehow the GLORIOUS AGE OF ISLAMIC CONQUEST-----as nothing but GLORIOUS AND OF GREAT BENEFIT TO MANKIND and---of course -----at it turned out GENGHIS KHAN WAS A GREAT GUY the whole issue that destroyed GOODNESS was the BRITISH EMPIRE-------thanks for the reminder
they are all equally evil except genghis and the spanish in south america who were the worst I know of
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top