German Official: We regret opening borders

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,759
2,040
upload_2017-1-29_11-5-36.png



Berlin made mistakes with its “open-door” refugee policy, which “went off course” and saw hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers entering the country over the past two years, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble admits.

The German government is currently trying “to improve what went off course in 2015,” Schaeuble told Die Welt’s Sunday edition in an interview. “We politicians are human beings and we also make mistakes, but one can at least learn from them,” he maintained.

On Friday, Handelsblatt cited a Finance Ministry report that shows Germany spent €21.7 billion ($23.3 billion) on tackling the refugee crisis in 2016. Most of the money went to German states and municipalities, which received €9.3 billion last year, while measures to integrate refugees received €2.1 billion in funding.

The straightforward statement comes on the heels of the severe refugee .....................................

German Official: We Regret Open Borders

The same like protester over there which we also see here got their way and look what happens now.
They too had people warning wtf was going to happen if their Country did this and now they are paying for it. Oh well you were warned. Just as the US freedom fighters keep warning. Your kids will get raped, your wives will get raped, sisters, mothers, and hell throw a few boys in there too. ..............

MSM isn't reporting more than half of that bs, why they want to keep people like those protesters at JFK dumbasses, bigger dumbasses than they already are.

There is a lot more to it than the rape issues, they are having to give up a lot to put them first.

In Italy a man was thrown out of his home so refugees could live there................
 
Alex Jones is really getting inside isn't he. How long we had the German hacked?
 
Muslims don't integrate.
Send them to Syria.


That's what I've always found so admirable about how euros came to america, just how seamlessly they integrated, so respectfully-n-shit.

Euros tended not to suffer from Sudden-Jihad-Syndrome.
And back then it was pretty much work or starve.
So why do we need more angry unskilled welfare recipients?
 
Ban refugees. Fine. But people with valid Visa have been denied entry. Some of them had only gone out of the country on a trip. People's lives have literally been turned upside down overnight.
 
The pattern is the same everywhere. The misguided women run around with signs supporting the immigration of terrorists. We love Refugees. Welcome Refugees. They expect to see wounded and traumatized widows and orphans. Instead they get tens of thousands of fighting age men all suffering from sexual emergencies. The women and girls are beaten and raped. The boys are beaten and raped. The men are beaten and robbed. The victims won't complain. It's racist. It's anti immigrant. The governments throw all support behind the invaders.

That's what democrats want to do here. Just like they did in Europe.
 
Ban refugees. Fine. But people with valid Visa have been denied entry. Some of them had only gone out of the country on a trip. People's lives have literally been turned upside down overnight.
If anyone left the country on a trip, that trip might have included training at a terrorist camp.
 
Ban refugees. Fine. But people with valid Visa have been denied entry. Some of them had only gone out of the country on a trip. People's lives have literally been turned upside down overnight.
If anyone left the country on a trip, that trip might have included training at a terrorist camp.


The guy speaks of all the above who weakly use the messenger as their pathetic excuse to deny factual information.
No wonder we have so many idiots in this Country.
 
Ban refugees. Fine. But people with valid Visa have been denied entry. Some of them had only gone out of the country on a trip. People's lives have literally been turned upside down overnight.
If anyone left the country on a trip, that trip might have included training at a terrorist camp.

You might get struck by lightning during a thunderstorm but its not probable. These people might have gone to terror camp but its least likely.

Many of these people had integrated into American society and built lives.
 
Ban refugees. Fine. But people with valid Visa have been denied entry. Some of them had only gone out of the country on a trip. People's lives have literally been turned upside down overnight.

upload_2017-1-29_12-0-44.png
 
Alex Jones is really getting inside isn't he. How long we had the German hacked?

Only a useful idiot uses the messenger as their denial of information and those who lack it show it like a sore thumb

upload_2017-1-29_12-2-4.png
 
View attachment 109372


Berlin made mistakes with its “open-door” refugee policy, which “went off course” and saw hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers entering the country over the past two years, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble admits.

The German government is currently trying “to improve what went off course in 2015,” Schaeuble told Die Welt’s Sunday edition in an interview. “We politicians are human beings and we also make mistakes, but one can at least learn from them,” he maintained.

On Friday, Handelsblatt cited a Finance Ministry report that shows Germany spent €21.7 billion ($23.3 billion) on tackling the refugee crisis in 2016. Most of the money went to German states and municipalities, which received €9.3 billion last year, while measures to integrate refugees received €2.1 billion in funding.

The straightforward statement comes on the heels of the severe refugee .....................................

German Official: We Regret Open Borders

The same like protester over there which we also see here got their way and look what happens now.
They too had people warning wtf was going to happen if their Country did this and now they are paying for it. Oh well you were warned. Just as the US freedom fighters keep warning. Your kids will get raped, your wives will get raped, sisters, mothers, and hell throw a few boys in there too. ..............

MSM isn't reporting more than half of that bs, why they want to keep people like those protesters at JFK dumbasses, bigger dumbasses than they already are.

There is a lot more to it than the rape issues, they are having to give up a lot to put them first.

In Italy a man was thrown out of his home so refugees could live there................
Has the German bitch admitted this yet? If so, I'd still believe its just politics. She cares more about destroying Germany than saving it. Stupid libs!
 
View attachment 109372


Berlin made mistakes with its “open-door” refugee policy, which “went off course” and saw hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers entering the country over the past two years, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble admits.

The German government is currently trying “to improve what went off course in 2015,” Schaeuble told Die Welt’s Sunday edition in an interview. “We politicians are human beings and we also make mistakes, but one can at least learn from them,” he maintained.

On Friday, Handelsblatt cited a Finance Ministry report that shows Germany spent €21.7 billion ($23.3 billion) on tackling the refugee crisis in 2016. Most of the money went to German states and municipalities, which received €9.3 billion last year, while measures to integrate refugees received €2.1 billion in funding.

The straightforward statement comes on the heels of the severe refugee .....................................

German Official: We Regret Open Borders

The same like protester over there which we also see here got their way and look what happens now.
They too had people warning wtf was going to happen if their Country did this and now they are paying for it. Oh well you were warned. Just as the US freedom fighters keep warning. Your kids will get raped, your wives will get raped, sisters, mothers, and hell throw a few boys in there too. ..............

MSM isn't reporting more than half of that bs, why they want to keep people like those protesters at JFK dumbasses, bigger dumbasses than they already are.

There is a lot more to it than the rape issues, they are having to give up a lot to put them first.

In Italy a man was thrown out of his home so refugees could live there................

They too had people warning wtf was going to happen if their Country did this and now they are paying for it.

For all decisions and courses of action, hindsight is 20/20. Among decisions that came down to a binary choice, the opportunity for launching the "I told you so" attack has only to do with what hindsight shows, not with one's sagacity and rigor in decision making in light of demonstrable, objective and preponderantly rational evidence, along with the weighting assigned to its elements, that was available when one made the decision.

The merit of saying "I told you so" appears and exists only insofar as one can along with the attack demonstrate that the decision maker at the time failed to consider one or more relevant factors. Because the weighting of those factors is generally the whole crux on which the decision rests, the post hoc "soothsayers" must also rigorously show how the weighting the decision maker used was patently stupid. All that must be done to a high degree of contextual and literal rationality, not merely so as to satisfy the burden of proof in the "court of popular opinion."...That is, of course, unless one is satisfied with being, in spite of one's denials, shown as a partisan clown.

While anyone with average luck will as often be able to say "I told you so," mature and responsible people focus, when humans live hang int he balance on all sides of a matter, on solutions first and assigning valueless culpability later, much later. The world has quite enough "finger pointers" overall, and, as go critics and merchants of blame who don't also at least propose actionable and well planned solutions along with touting their good fortune at being on the side that hindsight favored, well, quite frankly, even one is too many of those.

The German government is currently trying “to improve what went off course in 2015,” Schaeuble told Die Welt’s Sunday edition in an interview. “We politicians are human beings and we also make mistakes, but one can at least learn from them,” he maintained.

It is telling that you failed to include additional and relevant remarks from Schaeuble. One being this:
“The growing number of Muslims in [Germany] today is a challenge for the open-mindedness of mainstream society.” Addressing the role of Islam in society, a hot issue in Germany, he vowed to create a “German Islam” compatible with the values of liberal democracy and pluralism."​
That statement shows Schaeuble as not casting the matter as one whereby merely Muslim is the problem. There is nothing official that has come Trump's Administration or campaign rhetoric that suggests he sees the matter in anything having a similarly egalitarian light. On the contrary, much that Trump has uttered and done strongly suggests the man sees most issues and particularly terrorism, national security, and immigration through only the lens of racial and religious bigotry.

Additionally, one will notice that the problem was described in the article as deriving from the "open door" policy toward refugees, the most recent influx of whom are Muslim. The problem is not described in the article as being that of merely having too many Muslims. Schaeuble gives credence to the innate cultural differences that must be resolved in order to assimilate such large quantities of Muslim refugees into the German society. He has good example for the there being a means to effectively do just that: the millions of Muslims who are contributing members not only to Germany's society before the refugees arrival, but also those of the rest of the Western and decidedly non-Muslim world.

Lastly, Schaeuble, by attesting to the mistake (as he sees it) of having an "open door" policy toward refugees, shows a level of maturity and responsibility of which there is no basis for thinking Trump even approaches, much less has.

our kids will get raped, your wives will get raped, sisters, mothers, and hell throw a few boys in there too.

You may want to present some official metrics that make your claim to this effect believable. Absent that, keen thinkers and readers must consider the remark that of a circus actor.

In Italy a man was thrown out of his home so refugees could live there

I don't know all that much about Italy per se; however, anyone who knows just a little bit about Italy -- even just from having traveled there last fall ans watched the news -- would know upon seeing your highly sensational presentation of the matter there must be more to the story than what you'e shared. Indeed there is. The issue, and it's a real one is that the Interior Minister's policy requires unused housing to be made available to migrants. To the extent that the quantity of settling migrants exceeds Italy's threshold for them -- 200K -- the individuals providing accommodation may only be able to receive monetary compensation via legal redress. The minister's policy is to require unused housing -- including hotel space and seconds homes -- be made available for migrants to use. Title to the property is not changing hands, although it could if the owner refuses to comply and the Interior Ministry determines to pursue that line of action. (See also this and this.)

Now I happen to agree that Italy's policy as goes housing the migrants is "20 kinds of wrong." The reason I called attention to the matter is because of your manner in presenting the issue. Politicians don't need aid in presenting partisan notions. Public discourse is benefitted only when the public maintain a high standard of integrity, not when the general citizenry engages in contextually obfuscatory hyperbole and uses as much to advance the empty cause of finger pointing. Kids and clowns can get away with that. It is beneath the standard by which mature intelligent adults comport themselves.
 
There's a difference in protesting and there is a difference in shredding what this Country was founded up on, there is a difference when these lunatics risk the lives of everyone because they can't understand where and why they even think the way they do.
They were indoctrinated by Govern. propaganda which spear headed into every direction the only ones who suffer from it all are those with weak minds easily lead by 1. Never question anything 2. never question authority ............................ The holocaust victims acted the same way you see where they ended up don't you.
People really need to learn wth social engineering is.
 
The holocaust victims acted the same way you see where they ended up don't you.

Would you present that in a somewhat coherent fashion, please? Before you do so, however, consider the events leading to and including the Rosenstrasse protest. The first two chapters of the book you'll find at that link present the nature and extent of German resistance to Nazism in the 1920s and 1930s. To even hint that Jews and others didn't question the motives and morality of HItler's rhetoric and policies is to show a profoundly willful degree of ignorance toward the reality of German history.

You should note that my ridicule of you is not because you are wrong to intimate that Jews sat idly by as Hitler systematically implemented his various pieces of anti-Semitic legislation, inveighed against Jews and thereby fomented and focused Germany's ethnic majority's cultural derision toward them, and with those foundations laid, conceived and undertook the most far reaching and heinous pogroms of the 20th century, lo of modern times. I do so because it's clear that had you bothered to but Google for confirmation of Jewish and non-Jewish political insouciance re: Hitler's policies, you'd have found there was no such thing. No, instructors don't in most high school or college history courses discuss the vagaries of Germans' prewar political resistance and challenges to Hitler's policies -- short, perhaps, of noting the strong arm tactics he used to squelch his detractors -- but the least bit of common sense would tell one that before attesting to there being effectively none, one would at least check to see if that was indeed so.

There's nothing terrible about being unavoidably mistaken in the wake of performing a fair amount of duly diligent inquiry into a topic. It's a whole 'nother matter to be wrong merely because one bumptiously thinks, and in turn acts, as though one's understanding of a matter comprises all there is to know about it, or even that one's understanding is directionally correct. That is particularly so when one feels obliged to remark upon historic events and circumstances.
 
Last edited:
The holocaust victims acted the same way you see where they ended up don't you.

Would you present that in a somewhat coherent fashion, please? Before you do so, however, consider the events leading to and including the Rosenstrasse protest. The first two chapters of the book you'll find at that link present the nature and extent of German resistance to Nazism in the 1920s and 1930s. To even hint that Jews and others didn't question the motives and morality of HItler's rhetoric and policies is to show a profoundly willful degree of ignorance toward the reality of German history.

You should note that my ridicule of you is not because you are wrong to intimate that Jews sat idly by as Hitler systematically implemented his various pieces of anti-Semitic legislation, inveighed against Jews and thereby fomented and focused Germany's ethnic majority's cultural derision toward them, and with those foundations laid, conceived and undertook the most far reaching and heinous pogroms of the 20th century, lo of modern times. I do so because it's clear that had you bothered to but Google for confirmation of Jewish and non-Jewish political insouciance re: Hitler's policies, you'd have found there was no such thing. No, instructors don't in most high school or college history courses discuss the vagaries of Germans' prewar political resistance and challenges to Hitler's policies -- short, perhaps, of noting the strong arm tactics he used to squelch his detractors -- but the least bit of common sense would tell one that before attesting to there being effectively none, one would at least check to see if that was indeed so. There's nothing terrible about being unavoidably mistaken. It's a whole 'nother matter to be wrong merely because one bumptiously thinks, and in turn acts, as though one's understanding of a matter comprises all there is to know about it.

Are you aware that google is a fancy name for snopes now? I do not use google as they filter out authentic information. They are Government controlled.
Until one understands the social warfare going on anything that is truth is a lie, anything that is a lie is truth.
Google is not a trusted source as they put claims on information that is nothing but leftist desired information.
 

Forum List

Back
Top