Georgia Special Grand Jury Report on the way

[playtime]

A projection meme. How cute.

well, since i don't believe a single word that comes outa donny's orange anus shaped pie hole ...

your reply makes zero sense.

much like you.

 

[Lastamender]

well, since i don't believe a single word that comes outa donny's orange anus shaped pie hole ...

your reply makes zero sense.

much like you.

It makes perfect sense. The Twitter Files and the Durham report proves that you believe proven liars. Nothing will change that fact. So it is projection and really all you got.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Fanny Whore wants her 15 minutes of fame. I think she used to get attention on the street....

The authentic voice of MAGA. File under respect for women.

 

[Oldestyle]

Historic special grand jury report in Georgia finally set for release

How does it line up with Fani Willis’ indictment against Donald Trump and his 18 co-defendants? We’re about to find out.

www.msnbc.com

This will give us the legal and common sense basis for the indictment of Trump in Georgia.

One statement of the grand jury is not only very telling, but basically irrefutable: "We find by a unanimous vote that no widespread fraud took place in the Georgia 2020 presidential election that could result in overturning that election."

Read the statement closely; it was not made by Fani Willis, it was made by a unanimous vote of ordinary Georgia citizens who served on the grand jury, based on evidence that they had access to and not Trump's dream that he carried Georgia, because he won the neighboring states of Alabama and South Carolina. BTW, he won South Carolina by less in 2020 than he did in 2016. Trump claims that he had to have won Georgia because people in Alabama and South Carolina told him that he couldn't have lost the state. It just goes to show Trump's aggressive, thorough and absolute lack of intelligence. He had no ability to understand elections, and he certainly has no ability to be president of the United States. To the contrary, he represents a clear and present danger to our security and well being. Hopefully, and likely, his butt will be behind bars when election day in 2024 rolls around.

Come on, Astro...a Grand Jury gets one side of a story and one side only. Willis gets to present "the world as she sees it" with no rebuttal from anyone. With a political DA like Willis it's obvious that the conclusion the Grand Jury is going to arrive at is going to be heavily tilted in the prosecution's favor. What's happening in Georgia is the opening of a Pandora's box that will affect America for years to come. You've got a party in power using the power of the Government to go after the leading candidate of the opposition party. This is literally an attack on our system of government and is FAR more dangerous to Democracy in this country then anything done by the Jan. 6th protesters, Antifa or Black Lives Matter extremists.

 

[Crepitus]

Or Fat queers from Wales, too. And uh..the whole article is worthless without the actual goods.

Why do you guys spend so much time accusing others of being homosexual?

DO you realise what that looks like?

 

[The Duke]

Why do you guys spend so much time accusing others of being homosexual?

DO you realise what that looks like?

Do you realize who we're talking about, Creepy? You fuckin' dumbass!

 

[Crepitus]

Do you realize who we're talking about, Creepy? You fuckin' dumbass!

No, it's your go-to thing when you can't come up with a logical response (which is most of the time) and not just to me.

Seems like you spend a lotta time thinking about it.

Also, you can't really insult me. NPCs like you don't matter. You aren't really insulting me, you're just running your programmed loop.

 

[The Duke]

No, it's your go-to thing when you can't come up with a logical response (which is most of the time) and not just to me.

Seems like you spend a lotta time thinking about it.

Also, you can't really insult me. NPCs like you don't matter. You aren't really insulting me, you're just running your programmed loop.

You don't realize when you've been insulted because you're as sharp as a bag of marbles and as deep as a sidewalk mudpuddle.

Speaking of NPCs:

You're the NPC way in the back on the right.

 

[Crepitus]

You don't realize when you've been insulted because you're as sharp as a bag of marbles and as deep as a sidewalk mudpuddle.

Speaking of NPCs:

You're the NPC way in the back on the right.

YOu cannot insult me.

You aren't a person.

 

[The Duke]

YOu cannot insult me.

You aren't a person.

Says who, Creepy? You? Well you ain't worth a shit.

 

[Crepitus]

Says who, Creepy? You?

Me. The only one who matters in this conversation.,

 

[The Duke]

Me. The only one who matters in this conversation.,

Well you go on ahead and continue it on with yourself.

 

[playtime]

It makes perfect sense. The Twitter Files

Deconstructing ‘The Twitter Files’​

Devin Coldewey@techcrunch / 3:49 PM EST•January 13, 2023

In each Twitter Files thread, we see unfounded assumptions, insinuations and personal interpretations given equal weight as facts, more or less establishing these as opinion pieces rather than factual reporting. That alone will have spiked a great deal of coverage, as however salacious the theory, little of what is actually provided satisfies editorial standards in many a newsroom.

It must also be obvious by now that this ostensible act of transparency was conducted with a definite goal: to discredit the previous moderation and management teams, and advance a narrative of systematic anti-conservative activity at Twitter. This has resulted, both deliberately and by neglect of basic best practices, in harassment and targeting of individuals.

Plainly this is all orchestrated by Elon Musk, whose spite is equally plain in the wake of his botched purchase of the platform — an event that has been catastrophic to his wealth and reputation. But catastrophe loves company, and he seems insistent that all receive a portion of his ruin.

That said, given the natural curiosity of our readership on these matters, I thought it may be of interest to catalogue the claims in one place, as well as what rendered most of them unreportable, despite occasionally containing notable information.
Deconstructing 'The Twitter Files' | TechCrunch

and the Durham report

Takeaways from the Durham report on the Trump-Russia probe​

By JOSH GERSTEIN and BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN
05/15/2023 07:31 PM EDT
Updated: 05/15/2023 09:14 PM EDT

For four years, Special Counsel John Durham examined the origins of the FBI’s investigation of links between Russian officials and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. His final report, which clocks in at more than 300 pages, was released Monday. Here are some takeaways.

Durham on defense​

In the report’s introduction, Durham seems to respond to some Republicans’ disappointment that he failed to secure significant criminal convictions related to alleged FBI misconduct in the Trump-Russia probe.

“[N]ot every injustice or transgression amounts to a criminal offense,” he wrote.
Durham brought criminal charges against just three people. He lost both cases that went to trial. In a third case, an ex-FBI lawyer named Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to altering an email that was used to support a surveillance application. Clinesmith was not sentenced to any prison time.
The law “does not always make a person’s bad judgment, even horribly bad judgment, standing alone, a crime,” Durham wrote.
Takeaways from the Durham report on the Trump-Russia probe

proves that you believe proven liars.

ne'eh.

Nothing will change that fact. So it is projection and really all you got.

lol ... false.

 

[Lastamender]

Deconstructing ‘The Twitter Files’​

Devin Coldewey@techcrunch / 3:49 PM EST•January 13, 2023

In each Twitter Files thread, we see unfounded assumptions, insinuations and personal interpretations given equal weight as facts, more or less establishing these as opinion pieces rather than factual reporting. That alone will have spiked a great deal of coverage, as however salacious the theory, little of what is actually provided satisfies editorial standards in many a newsroom.

It must also be obvious by now that this ostensible act of transparency was conducted with a definite goal: to discredit the previous moderation and management teams, and advance a narrative of systematic anti-conservative activity at Twitter. This has resulted, both deliberately and by neglect of basic best practices, in harassment and targeting of individuals.

Plainly this is all orchestrated by Elon Musk, whose spite is equally plain in the wake of his botched purchase of the platform — an event that has been catastrophic to his wealth and reputation. But catastrophe loves company, and he seems insistent that all receive a portion of his ruin.

That said, given the natural curiosity of our readership on these matters, I thought it may be of interest to catalogue the claims in one place, as well as what rendered most of them unreportable, despite occasionally containing notable information.
Deconstructing 'The Twitter Files' | TechCrunch

Takeaways from the Durham report on the Trump-Russia probe​

By JOSH GERSTEIN and BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN
05/15/2023 07:31 PM EDT
Updated: 05/15/2023 09:14 PM EDT

For four years, Special Counsel John Durham examined the origins of the FBI’s investigation of links between Russian officials and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. His final report, which clocks in at more than 300 pages, was released Monday. Here are some takeaways.

Durham on defense​

In the report’s introduction, Durham seems to respond to some Republicans’ disappointment that he failed to secure significant criminal convictions related to alleged FBI misconduct in the Trump-Russia probe.

“[N]ot every injustice or transgression amounts to a criminal offense,” he wrote.
Durham brought criminal charges against just three people. He lost both cases that went to trial. In a third case, an ex-FBI lawyer named Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to altering an email that was used to support a surveillance application. Clinesmith was not sentenced to any prison time.
The law “does not always make a person’s bad judgment, even horribly bad judgment, standing alone, a crime,” Durham wrote.
Takeaways from the Durham report on the Trump-Russia probe




ne'eh.



lol ... false.

 

[The Duke]

 

[lennypartiv]

Another ham sandwich will be indicted.

It sure would be nice if they investigated the voter fraud.