DontBeStupid
Look it up!
Violation of at least 3 amendments in there: 1st, 5th, 10th.
He also overstepped the powers granted to him in Article 2, in violation of the powers given the Senate in Article 1.
Your first two examples were passed by Congress.
Your third was not a violation but an observation.
Your fourth does not violate the First Amendment because what you are saying didn't happen.
The targeting of Al-awlaki when the government didn't have enough on him to put him in jail for more than 15 years was passed by Congress?
The first item was passed by Congress at his behest and signed by him.
Catholic institutions who self-insure will not have to pay for services which violate Catholic tenets? Even if you are correct on that in spite of what I have heard to the contrary, he did violate the 1st amendment and then attempted to walk it back. He does not get credit for upholding the constitution when only public outcry holds him back from violating it.
The Supreme Court will be deciding over the course of the next several years how extensive Obama's abrogation of the Constitution has been.
You never mentioned Al-awlaki. And what you did mention was Catholics. Not Catholic Institutions. Big difference.
And if you think him signing legislation means he violated the Constitution, then you also need to think the people who passed it violated the Constitution as well. Do you think all of Congress violated the Constitution?