Fully vaxxed fake native American Elizabeth Warren tests positive for Covid

Chinese communist military has possession of both SARS-CoV-2 and its closest relative, as does the U.S. military. The only intelligent name for this virus is Chinese communist virus. Baron's USMB thread on why vaccines don't work is reinforced by this Italian study and shows why there remain dangerous unvaxxed surfaces of the vaxxed that can re-transmit the virus back into the environment:

Dec 2021 IgA / mRNA BNT162B2 Vaccine
'....The mRNA BNT162B2 vaccination eleicits a strong systemic immune response by drasticlly boosting neutralizing antibodies development in serum, but not in saliva, indicating that at least oral mucosal immunity is poorly activated by this vaccination protocol, thus failing in limiting the virus acquisition upon its entry through this route. In saliva, IgG is almost two orders of magnitude lower than in serum.'
 
The US taxpayers should not have to pay exceptional students to learn.

wonderful opportunities to earn money while extending knowledge base in the medical and scientific communities. I don’t understand the idea of money being used to make someone do something that they should do for free or at their own expense.

Personal experience: it took 10 years
Epitaph on Our Economy's Tombstone: IF YOU'RE SO SMART, WHY HAVEN'T YOU MADE THE RICH RICHER?

Your attitude about rewarding talent implies that the superior student only benefits himself, as if he could and did major in something like Casino Gambling. Contrary to your programmed bitter and jealous resentment, business and society benefit from developing our most valuable human resources. That won't last; asking the talented to swallow their pride chokes their talent. We could have cured cancer 50 years ago, but only educated eunuchs have been working on it. No wonders those gutless lab rats are losers and failures.


Asking someone to sacrifice years of his life working without pay as a university student is insulting and ungrateful. With a society backing up bullying business parasites' attitude of turning geniuses into sissy nerd pushovers who meekly submit to becoming Cash Cows for Corporate Cowboys, the only way out is for smart people to use their talent selfishly, even illegally by hacking and confiscating the loot taken from us.

An alternative revolution would be unionizing to get 50% of the value of the corporate patents these slavish nerdboys create, but anyone who submits to the insult of unpaid education has no pride and wouldn't have the self-confident defiance necessary to organize or join any union. Practically all have become wimpy self-hating nerds who ought to commit suicide for betraying genius.
 
Epitaph on Our Economy's Tombstone: IF YOU'RE SO SMART, WHY HAVEN'T YOU MADE THE RICH RICHER?

Your attitude about rewarding talent implies that the superior student only benefits himself, as if he could and did major in something like Casino Gambling. Contrary to your programmed bitter and jealous resentment, business and society benefit from developing our most valuable human resources. That won't last; asking the talented to swallow their pride chokes their talent. We could have cured cancer 50 years ago, but only educated eunuchs have been working on it. No wonders those gutless lab rats are losers and failures.


Asking someone to sacrifice years of his life working without pay as a university student is insulting and ungrateful. With a society backing up bullying business parasites' attitude of turning geniuses into sissy nerd pushovers who meekly submit to becoming Cash Cows for Corporate Cowboys, the only way out is for smart people to use their talent selfishly, even illegally by hacking and confiscating the loot taken from us.

An alternative revolution would be unionizing to get 50% of the value of the corporate patents these slavish nerdboys create, but anyone who submits to the insult of unpaid education has no pride and wouldn't have the self-confident defiance necessary to organize or join any union. Practically all have become wimpy self-hating nerds who ought to commit suicide for betraying genius.
Epitaph on Our Economy's Tombstone: IF YOU'RE SO SMART, WHY HAVEN'T YOU MADE THE RICH RICHER?
Your attitude about rewarding talent implies that the superior student only benefits himself, as if he could and did major in something like Casino Gambling. Contrary to your programmed bitter and jealous resentment, business and society benefit from developing our most valuable human resources. That won't last; asking the talented to swallow their pride chokes their talent. We could have cured cancer 50 years ago, but only educated eunuchs have been working on it. No wonders those gutless lab rats are losers and failures.


Asking someone to sacrifice years of his life working without pay as a university student is insulting and ungrateful. With a society backing up bullying business parasites' attitude of turning geniuses into sissy nerd pushovers who meekly submit to becoming Cash Cows for Corporate Cowboys, the only way out is for smart people to use their talent selfishly, even illegally by hacking and confiscating the loot taken from us.

An alternative revolution would be unionizing to get 50% of the value of the corporate patents these slavish nerdboys create, but anyone who submits to the insult of unpaid education has no pride and wouldn't have the self-confident defiance necessary to organize or join any union. Practically all have become wimpy self-hating nerds who ought to commit suicide for betraying genius.
There are 2 choices in every classroom and these same 2 choices extend to the real world. Rewarding consistent hard effort produces more of the same. Rewarding slackers who “achieve” the exact rewards as those who worked extremely hard for the same award or honor is bogus.

What kind of outcome occurs when hard work and persistent effort (not always the A and A/B students btw) isn’t rewarded and the rewards go to students or citizens who expect their government and/or their families to take care of them as adults, when they have no disabilities that justifiably requires help?

You’re dead wrong about me having any animosity about people who work hard and make a lot of money. What was that comment all about. Did you pull that out of your magic hat? You better go ask for a refund it’s a dud. I just read the rest of your post and none of your projecting is accurate. Are you on some pity party because you didn’t get in college? Did you have teachers who rewarded everybody regardless of individual effort and those sleeping in class? You made your choice, and I made mine as an overachiever who had to work hard to excel. If you think I’m jealous of somebody who has a bigger brain than I do that’s one of the ways I learn you numbskull. Even here. I also have learned about posters who project as a rule, and you seem to fit that bill.
 
Epitaph on Our Economy's Tombstone: IF YOU'RE SO SMART, WHY HAVEN'T YOU MADE THE RICH RICHER?

There are 2 choices in every classroom and these same 2 choices extend to the real world. Rewarding consistent hard effort produces more of the same. Rewarding slackers who “achieve” the exact rewards as those who worked extremely hard for the same award or honor is bogus.

What kind of outcome occurs when hard work and persistent effort (not always the A and A/B students btw) isn’t rewarded and the rewards go to students or citizens who expect their government and/or their families to take care of them as adults, when they have no disabilities that justifiably requires help?

You’re dead wrong about me having any animosity about people who work hard and make a lot of money. What was that comment all about. Did you pull that out of your magic hat? You better go ask for a refund it’s a dud. I just read the rest of your post and none of your projecting is accurate. Are you on some pity party because you didn’t get in college? Did you have teachers who rewarded everybody regardless of individual effort and those sleeping in class? You made your choice, and I made mine as an overachiever who had to work hard to excel. If you think I’m jealous of somebody who has a bigger brain than I do that’s one of the ways I learn you numbskull. Even here. I also have learned about posters who project as a rule, and you seem to fit that bill.
College Is for Coolies. Chinese Are Better at That, Which Is Why Our Coolies Can't Compete With Their Coolies.

Working without pay, a college student lives like a child. So he winds up
with the mind of a child: blurting out shallow simplistic thoughts. Emotionally immature because he voluntarily went through a deprivation of a normal and natural young adulthood, he throws tantrums at anyone who disagrees with his cartoonish worldview. You illustrate my point to a T. T for teenager who was afraid to grow up, which describes the average college student.

I am proud that most Americans, regardless of mental talent, refuse to work without pay to impress some economic bully who hires that kind of bootlicking wuss. So, despite your pleas for sympathy about the slavish sacrifice you made, any independent thinker must judge that you don't deserve the job you were given, because you didn't have to compete with anybody who had self-respect. In other words, as I just said, you didn't have to compete with real Americans.
 
College Is for Coolies. Chinese Are Better at That, Which Is Why Our Coolies Can't Compete With Their Coolies.

Working without pay, a college student lives like a child. So he winds up
with the mind of a child: blurting out shallow simplistic thoughts. Emotionally immature because he voluntarily went through a deprivation of a normal and natural young adulthood, he throws tantrums at anyone who disagrees with his cartoonish worldview. You illustrate my point to a T. T for teenager who was afraid to grow up, which describes the average college student.

I am proud that most Americans, regardless of mental talent, refuse to work without pay to impress some economic bully who hires that kind of bootlicking wuss. So, despite your pleas for sympathy about the slavish sacrifice you made, any independent thinker must judge that you don't deserve the job you were given, because you didn't have to compete with anybody who had self-respect. In other words, as I just said, you didn't have to compete with real Americans.
I’m going to check the percentages but there has always been a high percentage of students who work part time and go to college full-time, while many others go to school part time and work full-time. Overachievers often work full-time and go to school full-time.

Personally, I would’ve loved to have been a career student and could have done so if paid to learn? How many other students would extend their education, year after year after year because they would be paid, are you kidding me? I would’ve absolutely jumped on that bus, to be given money to stay in school for 15 years beyond the educational norm! I cannot see how that would have benefited anyone other than myself. I realize there are many people who only focus on their own needs and would jump on not just free college, but being paid to learn. So what happens when one year, there are no funds to go around to pay these students to learn? What would that do to student motivation after being paid consistently before? It would mean no monetary incentive to learn, less to no desire to learn. Not a good correlation in my mind, but in yours that seems to be the case.

I’m having trouble following your thoughts anyway. You attribute so many statements to my posts that are basically lies, so I think we’re done here. There are about five posters just like you on here. If you’re going to tell other posters what THEY think than you are revealing emotional weakness. It’s time to improve your tactics and play fair.
 

Forum List

Back
Top