bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,028
- 280
The Dem Apology Party tends to forget that they have controlled the pocketbook for over 3 years.
A pocketbook, in the hands of a liberal, should be considered a Weapon of Mass Destruction.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Dem Apology Party tends to forget that they have controlled the pocketbook for over 3 years.
Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
My obvious observation is that if things were "good" under the Republicans, the Democrats surely would not have taken over anything.
Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
My obvious observation is that if things were "good" under the Republicans, the Democrats surely would not have taken over anything.
Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
My obvious observation is that if things were "good" under the Republicans, the Democrats surely would not have taken over anything.
Yep. But if those conservatives who sat on their hands and didn't vote or who voted out the more electable incumbants in the primaries had known the Democrats would be sooooo much more irresponsible than the irresponsible Republicans, they might have reconsidered that strategy. Remember that President Obama and the Dem leaders were talking a much different game as candidates than they are living as elected officials.
The Democrats and lefties who hated George W. Bush wouldn't have voted for him in any case. It was the conservative Independent and GOP base that bailed and that, along with the kool-ade fueled Obamamania in the 2008 election was enough to give the Dems substantial majorities in both houses.
So tell me. Is that really working out good for you?
So tell me. Is that really working out good for you?
So tell me. Is that really working out good for you?
I didn't vote for Obama and I'm giving him as much a chance as I give anybody who takes the job. He hasn't really pissed me off yet but I'm sure that will come. With Clinton it came with Waco. For Bush it was the War in Iraq, which was the one thing that kept me from voting for McCain. I would have voted for Ron Paul if I could have.
Is it working for me? I don't think it is working for anybody. But when I weigh a war I was against versus socialistic policies, I figure at least policies can be changed. Ever since '03 with the start of the Iraq War and '04 when we had so-called conservatives saying that "deficits didn't matter", I have figured the American Century is over. '03 & '04 reminded me so much of the 1970's, it surprises me how anybody views the resulting inflation that saw $4.00 a gallon gasoline and grocery and housing prices going through the roof as "good"? But then again, I saw the 70's as a train wreck and saw a repeat coming ever since '04.
If only St.Sarah had gotten elected . . .
If only St.Sarah had gotten elected . . .
Having the choice between the corrupt and inept, and simply the inept wasn't easy in 2008.
Being a 21st century voter ain't gettin' any easier.
If only St.Sarah had gotten elected . . .
Having the choice between the corrupt and inept, and simply the inept wasn't easy in 2008.
Being a 21st century voter ain't gettin' any easier.
It matters HOW a person is corrupt. If competent and just self serving, probably competent is better than inept in hard times.
But if a person is corrupt in ways intended to damage the economy and dismantle the fibers that have made this a great country, I'll go with inept.
From what I've seen so far though we may have a case of both incompetent AND inept on our hands now.
You blame President Bush for a war that was voted on a bipartisan basis with a large percentage of the Congress supporting it?
Well yes-and-no. Yes, obviously I used it. No, I wasn't using it to refer to anything Cheney said. I was referring to articles by economists I saw published at the time which were being parrotted by Republicans friends of mine. Mike down at the office is one of those. I kidded him about after he attended the '09 Tea Party.And you are still using that stupid Cheney line taken out of context "Deficits don't matter" as if he actually said that as the leftists present it?
You blame President Bush for a war that was voted on a bipartisan basis with a large percentage of the Congress supporting it?
Yes, you can refer to snopes.com: Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq in regards to his actions before Congress. But what turned me against Bush was really the night he went on television to lay out his case against Saddam Hussein. I recall the Cuban missile crisis and was expecting Bush to offer some convincing evidence because in the prior weeks there had been some alarms about weapons of mass destruction but within days of their annoucement the alarms had been discredited. I came away thinking the administration had no more clue than what had been previously displayed.
Well yes-and-no. Yes, obviously I used it. No, I wasn't using it to refer to anything Cheney said. I was referring to articles by economists I saw published at the time which were being parrotted by Republicans friends of mine. Mike down at the office is one of those. I kidded him about after he attended the '09 Tea Party.And you are still using that stupid Cheney line taken out of context "Deficits don't matter" as if he actually said that as the leftists present it?
My obvious observation is that if things were "good" under the Republicans, the Democrats surely would not have taken over anything.
Yep. But if those conservatives who sat on their hands and didn't vote or who voted out the more electable incumbants in the primaries had known the Democrats would be sooooo much more irresponsible than the irresponsible Republicans, they might have reconsidered that strategy. Remember that President Obama and the Dem leaders were talking a much different game as candidates than they are living as elected officials.
The Democrats and lefties who hated George W. Bush wouldn't have voted for him in any case. It was the conservative Independent and GOP base that bailed and that, along with the kool-ade fueled Obamamania in the 2008 election was enough to give the Dems substantial majorities in both houses.
So tell me. Is that really working out good for you?
And as the silence is broken only by crickets off in the distance, our Fair Maiden, a foxy one indeed, waits patiently for a response.. will it come.. doubtful...
Yep. But if those conservatives who sat on their hands and didn't vote or who voted out the more electable incumbants in the primaries had known the Democrats would be sooooo much more irresponsible than the irresponsible Republicans, they might have reconsidered that strategy. Remember that President Obama and the Dem leaders were talking a much different game as candidates than they are living as elected officials.
The Democrats and lefties who hated George W. Bush wouldn't have voted for him in any case. It was the conservative Independent and GOP base that bailed and that, along with the kool-ade fueled Obamamania in the 2008 election was enough to give the Dems substantial majorities in both houses.
So tell me. Is that really working out good for you?
And as the silence is broken only by crickets off in the distance, our Fair Maiden, a foxy one indeed, waits patiently for a response.. will it come.. doubtful...
.. well.. not the first I've been wrong
When Obama took office the stock market was at a 15 year low. The unemployment rate had been going up for 6 mos. and most economist expected it would reach 10% within a year. Retail sails were in the toilet. The Bush administration left him with largest budget deficit in actual dollars of any president. The banking criss was the worst the country had seen since the Great Depression.Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
When Obama took office the stock market was at a 15 year low. The unemployment rate had been going up for 6 mos. and most economist expected it would reach 10% within a year. Retail sails were in the toilet. The Bush administration left him with largest budget deficit in actual dollars of any president. The banking criss was the worst the country had seen since the Great Depression.Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
Now, GDP is rising, consumer spending is the highest it has been since 2007 and unemployment is falling. The CBO estimates that the current 1.5 trillion dollar deficit will decrease by half by 2014.
I don't see any figures that support your statements.
Bush Leaving Next President Record Federal Budget Deficit
Congressional Budget Office - Home Page
When Obama took office the stock market was at a 15 year low. The unemployment rate had been going up for 6 mos. and most economist expected it would reach 10% within a year. Retail sails were in the toilet. The Bush administration left him with largest budget deficit in actual dollars of any president. The banking criss was the worst the country had seen since the Great Depression.Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
Now, GDP is rising, consumer spending is the highest it has been since 2007 and unemployment is falling. The CBO estimates that the current 1.5 trillion dollar deficit will decrease by half by 2014.
I don't see any figures that support your statements.
Bush Leaving Next President Record Federal Budget Deficit
Congressional Budget Office - Home Page
When Obama took office the stock market was at a 15 year low. The unemployment rate had been going up for 6 mos. and most economist expected it would reach 10% within a year. Retail sails were in the toilet. The Bush administration left him with largest budget deficit in actual dollars of any president. The banking criss was the worst the country had seen since the Great Depression.Just an observation
Since the Democratic Party took over the Congress and Obama became President things in this country have gone from good to an accelerating pace downhill.
Now .. granted, this is an obvious observation that no one can dispute...
But.. If some rose colored, glasses wearing loyal Democrat would like to convince me otherwise... I'm interested...
Now, GDP is rising, consumer spending is the highest it has been since 2007 and unemployment is falling. The CBO estimates that the current 1.5 trillion dollar deficit will decrease by half by 2014.
I don't see any figures that support your statements.
Bush Leaving Next President Record Federal Budget Deficit
Congressional Budget Office - Home Page
Notice what they predict for after 2014? It's right back up there by 2020. And this is only the budget. Our Government hasn't stayed within the budget in decades. this Administration is spending way too much money we don't have. As did Bush. Only now it looks like a race to see how fast it can be spent.