France record temperature.....more fakery!!

The next reading will be from a parked Puegoet sitting in the sun at Charles de Gaulle airport
Such garbage as usual.
My daughter and friends are in France.
It's hot
Look where it was measured if you can figure out where the Mediterranean is.
Ah well Irish, no dogs, blacks or Irish in London apt Windows
"A great people ruined by drink"

You're a goofy loon
Very true.
Takes one to know one!
Finally figure the rabbit whole you were going down and decide to shut up?


Who shut up ?
Explain the science behind asphalt then. Put up or shut up.
This is a very basic concept. The mass of the parking lot is BLACK, which absorbs more energy from the sun creating a higher temperature above it. Thermometers in close proximity develop what is called "sensor bias" because the near area air temperature is artificially increased by the asphalts warming of it.

The main problem of the HCN (Historical Climate Network) is due to changes around many of the sensor sites where data is collected. This is known by scientists as the Urban Heat Island Effect or UHI. This develops around cities where most of our climatic stations are located. This is the reason US-CRN was created. to remove this artificial, man made-land use change, bias from the data.

We know, by empirical experiment, if there are enough sensors affected the combined aggregate temperature will be artificially raised.
Thank you Billy Bob, about time some ne knew what the fuck they were talking about. So what you are saying is thAt do to increased amount of ashalt which stores and then radiates heat constantly for long periods of time these weather stations readings are thrown off as compared to lets say the 1930's. Seeing how concrete and asphalt are need for ingress and egress for your poroperty, how far would you say the nearest asphalt or concrete is from where you live Billy Bob?

Land use change is the primary reason that the HCN is no longer a reliable source for climate monitoring. The problems in France show that it is a global problem, in poor site control and care. The one in the OP overstated the warming by 1.9 deg C compared to 5 other privately owned and cared for weather stations within one mile of it. Even two of the French Meteorological sites (within 5 miles) show the temperature was overstated.

The evidence is clear that this is a case of sever station change bias.
Omg 1.9?
It was actually quite cool
 
Would be an agent easily noticed by modern scientific equipment. Since no such agent or mechanism has been found man made global warming is the only theory that makes sense.
IN YOUR OPINION, one that I can disprove very easily. Its called our Oceans.

Our oceans can out gas very quickly when our sun warms them, biological matter increases in this warmth and the decay process is enhanced. This is why CO2 lags temperature rise in all cases. These two simple processes dwarf mans input by a factor of five on the low side of their mass. As we still do not know how to model this system properly and all modeling overstates the affect, its is highly probable mans impact is far less than 0.1 Deg C per doubling of CO2 as our atmosphere is acting in a dampening manner not an enhancing one like the AGW hypothesis purports.

View attachment 267914

You will note that CO2 lags all temperature change by 80-200 years.
Fine, but what causes the warming then? If anything isn't that a reason to argue that relatively small changes in CO2 emissions as you say mankind is causing, can cause a rise in temperature far disproportionate? You are conflating cause and effect here in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
You will notice that all of the climate crusaders are people who just for some reason tend to the hysterical. They see the same violent thunderstorm we've all been seeing for decades and immediately pivot to "This must be climate change!". Come next winter, go to the local supermarket and find the customer loading up 3 baskets of food with a 6 inch snowstorm approaching. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that person is a climate crusader like Taz.....they just navigate life waiting for the house to fall out of the sky on top of them.

My neighbor across the street.........same thing. Climate crusader........strides over when he see's some gun range targets Ive put up in my garage. Freaked him out......was like he was having a panic attack. That's how these people are.....just prone to being suckered by bomb throwers.
They see the same violent thunderstorm we've all been seeing for decades and immediately pivot to "This must be climate change!".
So a "climate crusader" is dumb for using a thunderstorm to affirm climate change. But a climate change denier can use a single heat record to deny it?
Do you see any problem here at all?

Us skeptics generally mention to you climate crusaders that to date, there has not been a single paper published in which the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and blamed on greenhouse gasses...and the generally ask for something simple like a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability..and you people never seem to be able to mange even a single piece of such evidence to support your position....we are skeptics because there simply is no actual evidence to support the claims...but feel free to prove me wrong...show me some actual observed measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

Climate crusaders are dumb for being so gullible that they swallow a piss poor hypothesis like the AGW hypothesis when there is not any actual evidence to support it...and the tragic thing is that they don't seem to know that there is no actual evidence to support it...Hell, I bet you are thinking to yourself that there is plenty of evidence....and you probably even think you have seen some...but you aren't going to be able to show even a single piece because in reality...no such evidence exists...so in the end, the best you will be able to do is offer up some lame excuse for not being able to provide any such evidence.
There are tons of papers on the subject. Going from sea level measurements. To ice core data. To simple temperature measurements. Just one example. Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997 Natural variations don't account for the rapidity of the changes. Natural variations can be traced. Solar activity, volcanic activity, earth rotation around its axis nothing fits the current changes. Except that is one.... human activity.
See science does measure quantify and look for evidence. The way I see it simply denying without providing a decent hypothesis to explain the data is faith.
You will find not a SINGLE climatologist or Oceanoligist who denies climate change and you will find few if any, in any other branch of science. What do you think it means that climate change denying finds no credible champions among those that actually research it?
Climate change is real. Human effect on it is still unproven.
Fine, then give a credible hypothesis that explains the current changes?
Not for nothing, we KNOW co2 is a greenhouse gas. We KNOW that humans have dramatically have increased the rate of which this gas is released in the atmosphere. We know the earth is warming. What's the unknown here in your opinion?

CO2 is a greenhouse gas is like a liberal's IQ. It has so little impact as to render the entire exercise to be a fruitless search for any intelligent life.
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
 
Would be an agent easily noticed by modern scientific equipment. Since no such agent or mechanism has been found man made global warming is the only theory that makes sense.
IN YOUR OPINION, one that I can disprove very easily. Its called our Oceans.

Our oceans can out gas very quickly when our sun warms them, biological matter increases in this warmth and the decay process is enhanced. This is why CO2 lags temperature rise in all cases. These two simple processes dwarf mans input by a factor of five on the low side of their mass. As we still do not know how to model this system properly and all modeling overstates the affect, its is highly probable mans impact is far less than 0.1 Deg C per doubling of CO2 as our atmosphere is acting in a dampening manner not an enhancing one like the AGW hypothesis purports.

View attachment 267914

You will note that CO2 lags all temperature change by 80-200 years.
Fine, but what causes the warming then? If anything isn't that a reason to argue that relatively small changes in CO2 emissions as you say mankind is causing, can cause a rise in temperature far disproportionate? You are conflating cause and effect here in my opinion.

Let us know when warmers start harping on local climate change and asking for $745 dollars to fix it rather than trillions.....
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.
when your argument fails empirical review and your shown why it fails.... Repeat the mantra of appeals to authority, even though you've been shown why they are lying..... Nice...

IF your this stupid then you deserve to be a slave...
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.
when your argument fails empirical review and your shown why it fails.... Repeat the mantra of appeals to authority, even though you've been shown why they are lying..... Nice...

IF your this stupid then you deserve to be a slave...
I answered your post too. And not by an appeal to authority. By the way, for the umpteenth time. If you are so assured of your case feel free to challenge that authority and publish a rebuttal. Considering you are instead talking here to me I'm very much inclined to believe you can't. The NGO's and government agencies mentioned here do contain meteorologists and atmospheric physicists. Your supposed area of expertise. Looking forward to seeing you plead your case that oceans warm by themselves and thereby cause global warming, not mankind to them. Until that time my appeal to authority (which it isn't, since the people I claim to follow are actual authorities with the same if not better credentials then you claim to have, and use to come to your conclusions.) is way more believable than a group who has to plead it's case on political forums not published papers. Who has to try to sell a global scientific conspiracy. Who has to refer to scientists and subsequently misrepresent their positions. And as a matter of course mistake cause for effect, climate and weather and who have to spend most of it's time explaining why scientists in their view don't know how to read a thermometer, or charts or a measuring stick or how to use sattelites.
 
Last edited:
Omg 1.9?
It was actually quite cool
Almost 5 deg F (4.18 deg F actually) warmer than the surrounding area... Yep! there is a problem with this site.


But not to the climate obsessed........if you surrounded the device with black tar and mirrors, they wouldn't bat an eyelash. Whatever level of fakery it takes. Same with them citing the models......they couldn't give a crap that there is a level of variability a million miles wide. They routinely point out the most radical line on the graph as gospel. Been watching these people in here for 10 years........its all fake all the time. Anybody with a smidge of curiosity in their brain can pick it up immediately.......

Watch the use of words used routinely by these bozo's....purposely vague in every post. Words like...............

increasing
warmer
higher
lower
elevated
hotter
dryer
melting
expansive
more
decreasing
startling
rise
quickly
dangerously




I mean doy.......rarely see anything operationally defined because it would fubar the ruse. Only the suckers among us get bamboozled with this loose association shit.:deal:

 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
Who has to try to sell a global scientific conspiracy.

Who has to refer to scientists and subsequently misrepresent their positions.
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
The first quote in full, see if you can spot the difference?
On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.
The Schneider Quote
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
Second one.
The common enemy of humanity is Man
In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention In natural processes. and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
Second one.
The common enemy of humanity is Man
In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention In natural processes. and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.

s0n....are you at all familiar with the term "gobblygoop"?

Nobody knows what you are saying!:113:

People not buried in the matrix get the quotes I posted though!:bye1:
 
Last edited:
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.

So in addition to not being able to grasp the effect of the urban heat island effect, and differentiate between local climate effects and global climate effects, you also can't differentiate between the political heads of scientific societies who are concerned with politics and fund raising and the working body of scientific societies who really aren't on board with the man made climate change scam at all.

There is a reason that the political heads don't put their climate change statements up for a vote among the working scientists who make up the body...the american physical society tried that once and it took them about a new york minute to find out that the body of working scientists who make up the american physical union see the climate change scam in an entirely different light than those who see it in terms of political power and funding...ask yourself some tough questions some time...learn to think critically and you won't be a useful idiot...
 
So you see under this belief heat islands are impossible.
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
Second one.
The common enemy of humanity is Man
In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention In natural processes. and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.

Ever read 1984? Guess not...Climate science took their game plan directly from George Orwell...
 
You really are clueless... Heat islands are created in these areas due to the increased mass and use of heat and cooling equipment. It is also the reason they dissipate so quickly once the mass is reduced.

He sounds like some of our favorite nutters who think they have found a way around the second law of thermodynamics...you go though their arguments one by one and demonstrate how they are all fatally flawed only to have them go back to the beginning making the same idiotic argument all over again...the tedium is as unbearable as the stupidity...let em rot in their own ignorance..they believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence will ever convince them otherwise...
Nutters? Let us see.
-American Association for the Advancement of Science
-American Chemical Society
-American Geophysical Union
-American Medical Association
-American Meteorological Society
-American Physical Society
-The Geological Society of America
-U.S. National Academy of Sciences
-U.S. Global Change Research Program
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Who do you get?
You are right it is tedious. One group of people claiming they know better than what comes down to the rest of the world. Because they find someone who writes blogs instead of papers.


Yuk....yuk......s0n........spending your entire life chained to the matrix is ghey............


"We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public's imagination...
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts...
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.
"

- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports




"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
."

- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations




"We've got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.
"
- Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation




"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world
."
- Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment




The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models
.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research




:oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28::spinner::spinner::spinner::oops-28:
Second one.
The common enemy of humanity is Man
In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention In natural processes. and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.

Ever read 1984? Guess not...Climate science took their game plan directly from George Orwell...

The level of naive in the climate crusaders is astounding. The whole " well look at the science"....as if there could never be any colussion amongst the scientific community. No special interests! Its called the dictatorship of science....its right out of the Alinsky playbook. Doy
 
And most of the climate obsessed know fakery is necessary to achieve the ultimate goal of herding the sheep under government everything. Power.

So offuckingcourse you dont hesitate with rigging the data. The ends justifies the means to these people....
 
We still have snow here..


IMG_20190707_201001.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top