France INcome Tax raised to 100%: Total Marxism

- and according to you, its Marie Antoinette?

You DO know how utterly stupid that is, DON'T YOU???

Give this a moment's thought.
Think about how the GObP/R wants YOU to pay higher taxes than the 1%.

Go ahead.

Think
about
it.


------------

How can people be THIS stupid? Every day, you nutters log on and post about how you want to give your money away to the wealthy and get NOTHING in return.

-----------

Blech.


-----------

Reduced to lying, yet again.

This is how we can tell that the ideas your party programs into you are bankrupt.
 
Chuck Schumer made that suggestion soley on the AIG execs who were getting multi-million dollar golden parachutes after leading a company that lost billions of dollars and received tax payer assistance. I agree with his suggestion in that case.

We can chat about the other comments you made too but those aren't 100% rates, still very high but not 100% which is what this thread is about.

Riiiight...91% is not 'remotely' close...:cuckoo:

Thanks for ignoring what I said about the one 100% example you did give.

You want an honest discussion..... Riiiight.

Those were private contracts with individuals that no government had the right to confiscate, which is why they did not. That you would advocate 100% confiscation when that individual was convicted of no crime is telling.

But tell us again how all those advocating 91% tax rates are 'remotely close' to what's happening in France...

Disingenuous tool.
 
Right wingers hated the frogs till now. Nothing angers a working stiff conservative like hearing about the wealthy having to pay more taxes, even the wealty in another country they never liked to begin with. Nothing delights working stiff conservatives like hearing about cuts to food stamps, head start, and other programs for the poor in their own country.
 
Right wingers hated the frogs till now. Nothing angers a working stiff conservative like hearing about the wealthy having to pay more taxes, even the wealty in another country they never liked to begin with. Nothing delights working stiff conservatives like hearing about cuts to food stamps, head start, and other programs for the poor in their own country.

Nobody should be paying more, or everyone should be paying more.. .at the same fucking goddamn rate... you know.. a little thing called equality in treatment

And you know.. personal responsibility is a GOOD thing... having government take personal responsibilities of some and passing it on to others is not a good thing

So fuck you, twerp
 

Well I never said the Ayn Rand hypothesis was wrong - just that you have to tax at much higher levels than you do in the U.S. now for it to happen.

So there we have it >100% will drive the wealthy away. No surprise.
 
Right wingers hated the frogs till now. Nothing angers a working stiff conservative like hearing about the wealthy having to pay more taxes, even the wealty in another country they never liked to begin with. Nothing delights working stiff conservatives like hearing about cuts to food stamps, head start, and other programs for the poor in their own country.

Nobody should be paying more, or everyone should be paying more.. .at the same fucking goddamn rate... you know.. a little thing called equality in treatment
Life isn't fair.



And you know.. personal responsibility is a GOOD thing... having government take personal responsibilities of some and passing it on to others is not a good thing

So fuck you, twerp
History has actually shown that's not always true.
 
Life isn't fair.

You seek to enslave others based on your own greed, and that's the best you can come up with?

:eek:

History has actually shown that's not always true.

Izzatrite?

I'd love to see you try and support that claim....



In the 1920's ordinary investors were allowed to leverage their portfolio's 10 to 1. This is one of many factors that led to the crash of 1929 and a shining example of a collective failure of individual personal responsibility.

So since investors had demonstrated their collective stupidity, the government made a law saying you can't have overnight positions leveraged at more than 2 to 1.
 
Life isn't fair.

You seek to enslave others based on your own greed, and that's the best you can come up with?

:eek:

History has actually shown that's not always true.

Izzatrite?

I'd love to see you try and support that claim....



In the 1920's ordinary investors were allowed to leverage their portfolio's 10 to 1. This is one of many factors that led to the crash of 1929 and a shining example of a collective failure of individual personal responsibility.

So since investors had demonstrated their collective stupidity, the government made a law saying you can't have overnight positions leveraged at more than 2 to 1.

The Great Depression was scientifically engineered by the Federal Reserve so they could buy up all US assets for pennies on the dollar. Go fuck yourself.
 
Right wingers hated the frogs till now. Nothing angers a working stiff conservative like hearing about the wealthy having to pay more taxes, even the wealty in another country they never liked to begin with. Nothing delights working stiff conservatives like hearing about cuts to food stamps, head start, and other programs for the poor in their own country.

Nobody should be paying more, or everyone should be paying more.. .at the same fucking goddamn rate... you know.. a little thing called equality in treatment
Life isn't fair.



And you know.. personal responsibility is a GOOD thing... having government take personal responsibilities of some and passing it on to others is not a good thing

So fuck you, twerp
History has actually shown that's not always true.

Was not asking for fair.. was indeed asking for equality in treatment.. big difference.. it is YOU guys who ask for things out of FAIRNESS.. hence your progressive systems

Yeah.. taking away personal responsibility has historically shown to be a good thing :rolleyes:
 
In the 1920's ordinary investors were allowed to leverage their portfolio's 10 to 1. This is one of many factors that led to the crash of 1929 and a shining example of a collective failure of individual personal responsibility.

So since investors had demonstrated their collective stupidity, the government made a law saying you can't have overnight positions leveraged at more than 2 to 1.

Not exactly true, but even if it were, it fails to support your claim that "personal responsibility is NOT a GOOD thing... having government take personal responsibilities of some and passing it on to others IS a good thing"
 
The Great Depression was scientifically engineered by the Federal Reserve so they could buy up all US assets for pennies on the dollar.




You really are fucking nuts. I mean, check yourself into the institute - level nuts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top