sartre play
Gold Member
- May 4, 2015
- 9,944
- 3,097
- 210
like to see some details on these 7 people?It was a total of seven people who said that, and they lied.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
like to see some details on these 7 people?It was a total of seven people who said that, and they lied.
She is the one who responsible for doing it, dumbass.Willis didn't. Get the facts.
She is the one who responsible for doing it, dumbass.
Then who filed the indictment?She was still in court, idiot.
No it does not.The link shows the DA submitted the indictment before the Grand Jury has finished deliberating. That's ironclad proof, numskull.
You just proved that you are the "I don't have a clue" boy.
So you cannot prove it: thanks.It's either that or the DA knows how to break the space-time continuum.
What's your best guess?
Yes it does.No it does not.
Makes me feel bad, huge amounts of posted negatives poor out daily,
with almost no confirming facts attached.
Keeping us confused seems to be the goal.
No...it wasn't submitted.The DA submitted the indictment without getting the approval of the grand jury.
Florida Man, who has never won the popular vote in an election, calls former Lt. Gov a "loser", as Duncan prepares to testify before a Georgia grand jury tomorrow.
By insisting he SHOULDN'T testify, under oath, to what he knows, is said Florida Man inviting a providential act of stochastic terrorism?
Again, I emphasize that we are discussing the leading contender for the GOP nomination.
Also note how insistent Mr. Duncan is that voters be shown the truth, and how he bemoans Cretin Social Media politics.
Thanks, NYPost..I love the "Florida Man" mantra!
No...it wasn't submitted.
It was posted in error.
The clerk of the Fulton County, Georgia, court system acknowledged Tuesday accidentally releasing what appeared to be a list of criminal charges against Donald Trump before he was actually indicted, and sought to deflect blame amid mounting criticism from Republicans who have seized on the blunder to characterize the case as rigged. After refusing to explain what happened for more than a day after Reuters posted the document the media outlet said was published on the court’s website, clerk Che Alexander’s office said she was doing a “trial run” of the court’s filing system on Monday “in anticipation of issues that arise with entering a potentially large indictment.” Alexander’s office said that led to the docketing of “what appeared to be an indictment, but which was, in fact, only a fictitious docket sheet.” Reuters found the docket and reported on it Monday afternoon, hours before the grand jury returned the indictment charging Trump and 18 allies over efforts to subvert the 2020 election results.
Georgia clerk says 'mishap' caused erroneous release of list of Trump charges
I can read, fuckstick.The indictment was posted before the Grand Jury handed down the indictments.
Why are you unable to comprehend that.
Just kidding, I know why.
I can read, fuckstick.
Don't presume to retell it.
Ask me why.
The question is why you should never presume to explain.Okay, why can't your read?
At some point incarcerating people involved and using truth serums and torture to get the truth may be needed and, in a nation, where people are more and more desperate, be approved of.The question is why you should never presume to explain.
The answer is - because you're a moron.
it already had a case number, fool. How can it have a case number if it wasn't submitted?No...it wasn't submitted.
It was posted in error.
The clerk of the Fulton County, Georgia, court system acknowledged Tuesday accidentally releasing what appeared to be a list of criminal charges against Donald Trump before he was actually indicted, and sought to deflect blame amid mounting criticism from Republicans who have seized on the blunder to characterize the case as rigged. After refusing to explain what happened for more than a day after Reuters posted the document the media outlet said was published on the court’s website, clerk Che Alexander’s office said she was doing a “trial run” of the court’s filing system on Monday “in anticipation of issues that arise with entering a potentially large indictment.” Alexander’s office said that led to the docketing of “what appeared to be an indictment, but which was, in fact, only a fictitious docket sheet.” Reuters found the docket and reported on it Monday afternoon, hours before the grand jury returned the indictment charging Trump and 18 allies over efforts to subvert the 2020 election results.
Georgia clerk says 'mishap' caused erroneous release of list of Trump charges
The question is why you should never presume to explain.
The answer is - because you're a moron.