Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
You were already linked to the differences between V2 and V3 and why V3 is more accurate. I will remind you that there were also adjustments in the opposite direction from V2 to V3, but the deceivers who feed you misinformation leave that out because they know you will ignore it even though I linked to it earlier in this very thread.This lie has already been rebutted in this very thread earlier. Repeating it does not suddenly make it valid.version 2 GISS graph
version 3 GISS graph
notice the y axis. it is 0.5C higher in version 3 but graph is identical pre-1915, and almost identical pre-1970. what would cause an across the board increase of older temps? remember the version 2 numbers are already cleaned up and homogenized, just not by the version 3 algorithms. UHI and TOBS were already correct for. the trend doesnt look a whole lot different but still.....
PS- this is not the same Raleigh station that is mention by BEST in my previous posts, it is the only one available off the GISS station selector.
Hahahaha. The first 40 years are an exact match, less the 0.5C offset but Eddie says they are different stations. How desperate. It's not unlike Crick saying that the Mythbuster's experiment that showed a CO2 reading of 7% must have been measuring something else unrelated to the experiment.
I dont think this is right so I am gonna just add 3 deg C to make it right.. the circular logic is stunning...