Fisker fires 75% of workforce

We sure do hear a lot of the failures with our tax dollars being flooded into the green energy, but there isn't any blooming success stories being told about the green energy jobs we are paying for.

What we spend on Green Energy is a lot less than we spend on fighter planes that we never put in combat zones because they might get shot down...

A non sequitur.

Was that an argument and an attempt to defend failed energy policy by the Obama Administration? Wasting people's money is wrong. Green Energy is not caught up to the times yet. It is too expensive to implement; rushing these things is even more costly when your investments go up in smoke. If Henry Ford had tried to run his cars on electricity, he would have folded almost instantly. The genius lies in the fact he used a resource that was already available to him in great abundance: Fossil fuels.

By they way, how do you feel about us sending tanks to our enemies in the Middle East, which may then be used to slaughter innocent people? Your logic is flawed, your argument is irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
Ain't it great being a chump of Big Oil AND Big Auto, AND the worst propaganda machine in our history?

News for hybrid electric car sales
Fleet News Online March 2013 Proves Best-Ever Month for USA Electric-Drive Car Sales
EV World - 1 day ago - 5 related articles »
March 2013 saw the largest sales of all electric vehicles ever, and the first month where all electric vehicle sales outstripped plug-in hybrid ...
Plug-in Electric Car Sales in Canada, March 2013
Green Car Reports - 3 days ago
Auto Outlook: Recalls, electric cars and sales, oh my
UPI.com - 1 day ago - 23 related articles »
 
Ain't it great being a chump of Big Oil AND Big Auto, AND the worst propaganda machine in our history?

News for hybrid electric car sales
Fleet News Online March 2013 Proves Best-Ever Month for USA Electric-Drive Car Sales
EV World - 1 day ago - 5 related articles »
March 2013 saw the largest sales of all electric vehicles ever, and the first month where all electric vehicle sales outstripped plug-in hybrid ...
Plug-in Electric Car Sales in Canada, March 2013
Green Car Reports - 3 days ago
Auto Outlook: Recalls, electric cars and sales, oh my
UPI.com - 1 day ago - 23 related articles »

You haven't shown anything that resembles something being profitable with our tax dollars, Francis.
 
California has plenty of infrastucture. Hell Pub a-holes won't even accept Medicaid for all, paid for by the Feds, and everyone saving money. All to keep screwing the blacks, supposedly LOL.
 
Ain't it great being a chump of Big Oil AND Big Auto, AND the worst propaganda machine in our history?

News for hybrid electric car sales
Fleet News Online March 2013 Proves Best-Ever Month for USA Electric-Drive Car Sales
EV World - 1 day ago - 5 related articles »
March 2013 saw the largest sales of all electric vehicles ever, and the first month where all electric vehicle sales outstripped plug-in hybrid ...
Plug-in Electric Car Sales in Canada, March 2013
Green Car Reports - 3 days ago
Auto Outlook: Recalls, electric cars and sales, oh my
UPI.com - 1 day ago - 23 related articles »

You haven't shown anything that resembles something being profitable with our tax dollars, Francis.


Jeebus it's dreary educating the dupes...CHANGE THE FEKKING CHANNEL!!! lol
 
80%+ of these projects ARE working, no thanks to you idiot greedy GOP party of NO, and their dupes..

Well, you said it, now just back up your tripe.
Also.....what is your definition of "working"?

Fact check: Are half of 'green' energy firms helped by stimulus out of business? - CNN.com


The Energy Department cites several success stories like one of the world's largest wind farms in eastern Oregon, massive solar power plants in Arizona and grants to Ford to produce fuel-efficient cars.

In fact, of the 28 funded projects -- involving 23 companies -- listed in a 2012 congressional report, only four involve businesses that were either sold or are not in operation.
 
80%+ of these projects ARE working, no thanks to you idiot greedy GOP party of NO, and their dupes..

Well, you said it, now just back up your tripe.
Also.....what is your definition of "working"?

Fact check: Are half of 'green' energy firms helped by stimulus out of business? - CNN.com


The Energy Department cites several success stories like one of the world's largest wind farms in eastern Oregon, massive solar power plants in Arizona and grants to Ford to produce fuel-efficient cars.

In fact, of the 28 funded projects -- involving 23 companies -- listed in a 2012 congressional report, only four involve businesses that were either sold or are not in operation.

And what has been the return to the Treasury of these wonderful "investments"?
 
Well, you said it, now just back up your tripe.
Also.....what is your definition of "working"?

Fact check: Are half of 'green' energy firms helped by stimulus out of business? - CNN.com


The Energy Department cites several success stories like one of the world's largest wind farms in eastern Oregon, massive solar power plants in Arizona and grants to Ford to produce fuel-efficient cars.

In fact, of the 28 funded projects -- involving 23 companies -- listed in a 2012 congressional report, only four involve businesses that were either sold or are not in operation.

And what has been the return to the Treasury of these wonderful "investments"?

That isn't the point, is it?

Where's our return on investment on the F-22, a plane that costs $143 MILLION a copy and has yet to be deployed to a combat zone despite three wars being fought since the first one rolled off the line.

These programs reduce the amount of oil we have to import, that makes them profitable to the country as a whole.
 
Fact check: Are half of 'green' energy firms helped by stimulus out of business? - CNN.com


The Energy Department cites several success stories like one of the world's largest wind farms in eastern Oregon, massive solar power plants in Arizona and grants to Ford to produce fuel-efficient cars.

In fact, of the 28 funded projects -- involving 23 companies -- listed in a 2012 congressional report, only four involve businesses that were either sold or are not in operation.

And what has been the return to the Treasury of these wonderful "investments"?

That isn't the point, is it?

Where's our return on investment on the F-22, a plane that costs $143 MILLION a copy and has yet to be deployed to a combat zone despite three wars being fought since the first one rolled off the line.

These programs reduce the amount of oil we have to import, that makes them profitable to the country as a whole.

Where's our return on investment for providing free cell phones?
Defense is a legitimate function of the national government. Funding experimental energy industries is not.
Why is it you cannot answer a simple question without veering into irrelevance? I know, it's because you suffer from a junior high school education and are not very bright.
 
[

Where's our return on investment for providing free cell phones?
Defense is a legitimate function of the national government. Funding experimental energy industries is not.
Why is it you cannot answer a simple question without veering into irrelevance? I know, it's because you suffer from a junior high school education and are not very bright.

Defense is a legitimate function.

But the F-22 contributes NOTHING to defense. The Air Force doesn't feel confident enough about them to deploy them to a war zone.

That's the point. The odd thing is you seem to begrudge a poor person a phone to use for emergency purposes, but man, spending 143 MILLION on planes we don't use in wartime, that's a totally legitimate expense.

Which reminds me of what a Republican said before the Crazy People took over...


"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." - Dwight D. Eisenhower.
 
[

Where's our return on investment for providing free cell phones?
Defense is a legitimate function of the national government. Funding experimental energy industries is not.
Why is it you cannot answer a simple question without veering into irrelevance? I know, it's because you suffer from a junior high school education and are not very bright.

Defense is a legitimate function.

But the F-22 contributes NOTHING to defense. The Air Force doesn't feel confident enough about them to deploy them to a war zone.

That's the point. The odd thing is you seem to begrudge a poor person a phone to use for emergency purposes, but man, spending 143 MILLION on planes we don't use in wartime, that's a totally legitimate expense.

Which reminds me of what a Republican said before the Crazy People took over...


"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." - Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Why do you make irrelevant comparisons to defense systems?
Oh yeah, because you're stupid.
 
[
Why do you make irrelevant comparisons to defense systems?
Oh yeah, because you're stupid.

Because it points out Right Wing Hypocrisy.

When it comes to government fraud, waste and abuse, no one has the Department of Defense beat.

We currently spend nearly 900 Billion a year to beat up on small third world countries, and we still can't beat them into submission, but we spend all this money on weapon systems that we never use, or can't use because they don't preform as promised or conceptualized.

You'll go on all day about the Obama Phone lady, but not the billions wasted by the Penatgon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top