Fire in the hole!

The Left is running on the idea that Bain bought healthy companies, looted them, and then sold or bankrupted them.
This is unbelievable. The left thinks that banks and other lenders are rubes waiting to be shorn and they never caught on to Bain's scheme in the 23+ years they were in business. If Bain were really doing that who would invest with them? Who would lend them money?

The only rubes the dimocrat clowns are interested in is their base, whom they know don't have a clue how a Bain type company operates. So they tout the failures - no one in business bats 1.000 - and present them as Bains objective all along. Their argument is unbelievably stupid, but you gotta give them credit for understanding their audience.
 
from the OP link...

The office supply industry was struggling and consolidating by the time Bain got into the game. As so often happens with a brutal private equity makeover, workers lost jobs they may well have lost anyway, with or without the assistance of the financial engineers. This is the weakness in the Obama campaign’s one-sided and, in a sense, unfair broadside against private equity.

You expected the OP to actually read and comprehend her own copy-paste? Man, you are demanding!
 

He did tell.

And your flatulence also tells.

Seems you can't break things down enough for people to understand you point.

Was you point that Romney ruined the company or that he turned crap into gold ?

Seems you could make a case for the second.

Obama seems to turn everything to crap.

Time for a change.

Thanks for pointing out that Romney knows how financials work and that he can make tough choices. Some people in the industry survived....

If it were up to Obama, they'd all lock arms, sing Kumbya and go down like the Titanic.
 
The Left is running on the idea that Bain bought healthy companies, looted them, and then sold or bankrupted them.
This is unbelievable. The left thinks that banks and other lenders are rubes waiting to be shorn and they never caught on to Bain's scheme in the 23+ years they were in business. If Bain were really doing that who would invest with them? Who would lend them money?

the left loves living in lies. They're nothing without them.

I am surprised Schillian isn't here to help Boop out. They seem to be a "team".

Of course, helping out just means more useless irelevent comments.

But, my guess it helps Boop as she sees the thread rammed down her throat.
 
The Left is running on the idea that Bain bought healthy companies, looted them, and then sold or bankrupted them.
This is unbelievable. The left thinks that banks and other lenders are rubes waiting to be shorn and they never caught on to Bain's scheme in the 23+ years they were in business. If Bain were really doing that who would invest with them? Who would lend them money?

Mostly, it is to fire up the class war and wealth envy types whom, sadly, comprise the base.

But the moderates who are coming out a punking Obama's economic tyranny against investment capital is quite damaging to them.
 
from the OP link...

The office supply industry was struggling and consolidating by the time Bain got into the game. As so often happens with a brutal private equity makeover, workers lost jobs they may well have lost anyway, with or without the assistance of the financial engineers. This is the weakness in the Obama campaign’s one-sided and, in a sense, unfair broadside against private equity.

You expected the OP to actually read and comprehend her own copy-paste? Man, you are demanding!

Allah forbid someone post a source that, you know, doesn't shoot their argument out of the water :rofl:
 

Forum List

Back
Top