Film: dims Too Racist even For The Nazis

Edgetho

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2012
15,439
6,564
390
Dinesh D'Souza's New Film Claims Democrats Once Too Racist for Nazis

Dinesh D’Souza’s newest film will not only make the controversial claim that Donald Trump has a lot in common with Honest Abe Lincoln, but will also suggest that Democrats were once too racist even for Nazis.

According to a clip provided exclusively to The Hollywood Reporter, the film, Death of a Nation, from the conservative provocateur contains a scene where several Nazis are discussing how they should identify Jews in the 1930s.

“How does the American identify the Negro?” asks one Nazi.

“One drop rule. Any discernible black ancestry makes one count as black,” says another.

“Even if someone acts white, they could still be counted as black?” a third Nazi asks.

That’s when D’Souza, who narrates the documentary, intones: “As for the Democratic one-drop rule, incredibly the Nazis found it too racist even for them.”

_________________________________________________________


“The meeting we dramatize in the film occurred on June 5, 1934, shortly after Hitler's ascent to power,” he says. “Present was a young justice ministry lawyer named Heinrich Krieger, who had studied in Arkansas and had done research into American race law.”

D’Souza says he also used as a source the book Racism, by George Fredrickson.

“Krieger knew and the Nazis knew what most American textbooks suppress — namely that every segregation law in the American South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor and enforced by Democratic officials,” says D’Souza.


History's a bitch, ain't it dims?
 
"Democratic one-drop rule" ??? :laughing0301:


Desperation is hilarious.


You're about a stupid little bitch....

One-drop rule - Wikipedia

The one-drop rule is a social and legal principle of racial classification that was historically prominent in the United States asserting that any person with even one ancestor of sub-Saharan African ancestry ("one drop" of black blood)[1][2] is considered black (Negro in historical terms), its implications of racial purity being that anyone unable to pass for white in the context of the US racial hierarchy is assigned the lower status of being non-white or colored.

This concept evolved over the course of the 19th century and became codified into the law of some states in the early 20th century. It was associated with the principle of "invisible blackness" and is an example of hypodescent, the automatic assignment of children of a mixed union between different socioeconomic or ethnic groups to the group with the lower status.[3]

The social and legal concept of the "one-drop rule" does not exist outside the United States.
 
"Democratic one-drop rule" ??? :laughing0301:


Desperation is hilarious.


You're about a stupid little bitch....

One-drop rule - Wikipedia

The one-drop rule is a social and legal principle of racial classification that was historically prominent in the United States asserting that any person with even one ancestor of sub-Saharan African ancestry ("one drop" of black blood)[1][2] is considered black (Negro in historical terms), its implications of racial purity being that anyone unable to pass for white in the context of the US racial hierarchy is assigned the lower status of being non-white or colored.

This concept evolved over the course of the 19th century and became codified into the law of some states in the early 20th century. It was associated with the principle of "invisible blackness" and is an example of hypodescent, the automatic assignment of children of a mixed union between different socioeconomic or ethnic groups to the group with the lower status.[3]

The social and legal concept of the "one-drop rule" does not exist outside the United States.

Oh I know exactly what it was. I'm simply bent over in laughter at your desperate attempt to associate it with political parties.

What can I say, I find intentional retards hilarious.
 

Forum List

Back
Top