Federal Judge knocks Jack Smith: questions "the legal propriety"

[TroglocratsRdumb]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Too bad she's not the judge on the January 6th case.

It would save Trump the trouble of having to appeal all the way to the highest court in the land.

Where he will no doubt win.

 

[debbiedowner]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

Too bad, a fed judge that has tried a total of 14 cases, doesn't know that a Federal grand jury can indict anywhere in the U.S. if it is a felony they are indicting.

 

[d0gbreath]

Smith held the original Grand Jury in Washington, but held a second one in Miami. That's in Florida for the geographically challenged.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Too bad she's not the judge on the January 6th case.

It would save Trump the trouble of having to appeal all the way to the highest court in the land.

Where he will no doubt win.

Smith’s entire case runs against the First Amendment.

He has less than nothing. It is pathetic.

 

[mudwhistle]

Too bad she's not the judge on the January 6th case.

It would save Trump the trouble of having to appeal all the way to the highest court in the land.

Where he will no doubt win.

The Jan 6th case will be thrown out on appeal.
And that judge should be arrested for human-rights violations.

 

[dudmuck]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

Aileen Cannon is showing she has no concept of grand jury secrecy.

Back when the 11th circuit reversed her (twice), she's sorta doing the same thing now, no jurisdiction. Jack Smith could go to the 11th circuit on this. The most sensible explanation here is its Trump tactic delay delay delay

 

[Lemmi]

The lesson to be learned here is never question what people are telling you was a sometwhat less than fair election or you could wind up like Trump. Indicted by more than one Federal grand jury.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Lastamender]

Aileen Cannon is showing she has no concept of grand jury secrecy.

Back when the 11th circuit reversed her (twice), she's sorta doing the same thing now, no jurisdiction. Jack Smith could go to the 11th circuit on this. The most sensible explanation here is its Trump tactic delay delay delay

The SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against Smith in the McDonald case.

 

[The5thHorseman]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

Not like Aileen has been knocked over, right?

 

[konradv]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

She needs to be recused. She’s attempting to tip the scales of justice.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The lesson to be learned here is never question what people are telling you was a sometwhat less than fair election or you could wind up like Trump. Indicted by more than one Federal grand jury.

Bogus indictments do not count.

 

[BackAgain]

Too bad, a fed judge that has tried a total of 14 cases, doesn't know that a Federal grand jury can indict anywhere in the U.S. if it is a felony they are indicting.

Some day you’ll learn about jurisdiction.

 

[dudmuck]

The SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against Smith in the McDonald case.

Its Bob Mcdonnell, an it was qui-pro-quo corruption.

 

[Lastamender]

Its Bob Mcdonnell, an it was qui-pro-quo corruption.

Not according to the Supreme Court.

 

[mudwhistle]

Aileen Cannon is showing she has no concept of grand jury secrecy.

Back when the 11th circuit reversed her (twice), she's sorta doing the same thing now, no jurisdiction. Jack Smith could go to the 11th circuit on this. The most sensible explanation here is its Trump tactic delay delay delay

Yeah.....Trump delayed bringing these indictments for 2.5 years.

 

[dudmuck]

Not according to the Supreme Court.

Mcdonnell was convicted by a court of law, then it was appealed up to the supreme court, where they legalized corruption.

 

[Lastamender]

Mcdonnell was convicted by a court of law, then it was appealed up to the supreme court, where they legalized corruption.

Lot of that going around. They recognized Smith for what he was. An ambulance chaser that sucks a mean dick.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Lot of that going around. They recognized Smith for what he was. An ambulance chaser that sucks a mean dick.

He has also given thousands of dollars to the Democrat Party.

No GOP donations.