FBI Was Court Ordered to Turn Over Documents on Seth Rich 14 Days Ago – For Some Reason They Are Refusing the Request… Why Is That?

MAGA Macho Man

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2022
8,987
20,805
2,288
Linear Time
What's the big secret why they aren't responding?

 
Seth knew too much
hillarysethrichnccjljd.png
hillarysethrich.jpg
 
It is very rare that a person is just randomly murdered walking down the sidewalk, and he wasn't robbed.
It's highly suspicious.
What was the murderer's motive?
Who had a motive to murder Seth?
Like the untimely deaths of various Spinal Tap drummers, perhaps the mystery of Seth's murder is best to remain unsolved.

Everyone knows that Seth Rich obviously died from the Covid-19 "clot shot" vaccine anyways.
 
What's the big secret why they aren't responding?

The FBI breaking the law?? :eek:
 
What's the big secret why they aren't responding?

I hope the gateway pundit gets sued just like Jones at infowars, for a billion dollars! :D: Seth's parents are being gravely hurt by this constant bull shit.

You do know that you and your ilk, are AWFUL, AWFUL, AWFUL inhumane people.


Your article is junk. Not much to go on and very convoluted.



For what purpose was Seth murdered by the DNC or Podesta? Hillary emails were NOT stolen.

Why and how would murdering him help them in any way? How would the DNC or Hillary benefit in any way, by murdering Seth?

Just stop. Stop promoting these lies about Seth being a thief....YOU ARE HURTING HIS FAMILY, day in and day out by your slander and false allegations.

We have SOLID PROOF that it was the Russian Gru, with indictments against them for it.

(I do not know why part of the article is crossed through??? ). :dunno:




Guccifer 2.0, the “lone hacker” who took credit for providing WikiLeaks with stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, was in fact an officer of Russia’s military intelligence directorate (GRU), The Daily Beast has learned. It’s an attribution that resulted from a fleeting but critical slip-up in GRU tradecraft...Guccifer 2.0 sprang into existence on June 15, 2016, hours after a report by a computer security firm forensically tied Russia to an intrusion at the Democratic National Committee. In a series of blog posts and tweets over the following seven months—conspicuously ending right as Trump took office and not resuming—the Guccifer persona published a smattering of the DNC documents while gamely projecting an image as an independent Romanian hacktivist who’d breached the DNC on a lark....Guccifer famously pretended to be a “lone hacker” who perpetrated the digital DNC break-in. From the outset, few believed it. Motherboard conducted a devastating interview with Guccifer that exploded the account’s claims of being a native Romanian speaker. Based on forensic clues in some of Guccifer’s leaks, and other evidence, a consensus quickly formed among security experts that Guccifer was completely notional.

Ehmke led an investigation at ThreatConnect that tried to track down Guccifer from the metadata in his emails. But the trail always ended at the same data center in France. Ehmke eventually uncovered that Guccifer was connecting through an anonymizing service called Elite VPN, a virtual private networking service that had an exit point in France but was headquartered in Russia. But on one occasion, The Daily Beast has learned, Guccifer failed to activate the VPN client before logging on. As a result, he left a real, Moscow-based Internet Protocol address in the server logs of an American social media company, according to a source familiar with the government’s Guccifer investigation. Working off the IP address, U.S. investigators identified Guccifer 2.0 as a particular GRU officer working out of the agency’s headquarters on Grizodubovoy Street in Moscow.

It wasn't some random hacker. It wasn't a fat slob in a basement somewhere. It wasn't a murdered DNC staffer. It was the Russians' foreign military intelligence agency, which engaged in a series of actions to disrupt Americans' faith in our electoral process -- just as our intelligence community has assessed for more than a year. Some people will never be convinced of this fact, including a cohort of Americans who would rather believe Putin's propaganda over their own country's unified intelligence assessment. But for most people, this is just another powerful piece of hard evidence detailing Moscow's treacherous meddling. The Daily Beast's story tries to introduce a strong Trump angle, but Ed Morrissey isn't particularly impressed: "Spencer Ackerman and Kevin Poulson argue that the news also “move the investigation closer to Trump himself.” Er, not really, although it clearly rebuts Trump’s earlier claims that the DNC hack might not have been conducted by Russia. We already knew that Roger Stone had been in contact with Guccifer 2.0 because Stone publicly declared it a years ago. That contact came after the hack, Stone insisted, and whether or not it’s true, Stone’s contact with Guccifer 2.0 has been well known for a long time. There’s nothing in the rest of this story to suggest that the revelation provides any more connection to Trump and his campaign than the data points already known." In any case, this is good news:


For the first time since the 2016 election, Congress is poised to move legislation to combat hackers and online trolls targeting American democracy. Senior Republicans and Democrats will come together on Thursday to stump for a revised version of a stalled election security proposal that has gained new momentum in recent days. The measure has now gathered enough backing from high-level lawmakers that it could prove the first concrete action taken in response to repeated calls from cybersecurity experts, election integrity advocates and state officials for Congress to help cash-strapped states upgrade their aging voting technology in the wake of the Russian hacks and disinformation campaigns that roiled the 2016 presidential race. When the updated bill is reintroduced Thursday afternoon, it will include sponsorship from the top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, giving the legislation the leadership backing it previously lacked.
The number one objective of all of these Russia probes should be to get to the very bottom of the Kremlin's machinations and take active steps to thwarting future interference. And Republicans should recognize that if Putin and his gang had decided that it was the GOP that they wanted to troll and harm (as they very well may in the future, as they partially did in 2016), the party would rightly be screaming bloody murder about foreign influence in the campaign. The Democrats may not be entirely innocent victims here, as some of their fingerprints are on various pieces of this Russia puzzle, but every American should stand against a hostile power using subterfuge to impact our democracy.



 
Last edited:
The info will be locked up for 66 years. :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg: :hyper:

The FBI needs to be completely dismantled.
:rolleyes: he had bloody hands and face, because he fought back... He was shot twice in the back as he tried to leave, they did not kill him...he died an hour later, cops showed up within 30 seconds of gunfire with sirens on, scaring the botched robbers and murderers.... The city had put in a new sound system, that sets alarm to police off when gunfire sound registers and tells police exactly where...they were only a block or two away....

A contract killer kills the victim, by putting a bullet in the head! They don't leave them alive.




DAVIES: Let's begin. Just remind us who Seth Rich was and what we know about his death.

ISIKOFF: Seth Rich was a 27-year-old man from Omaha, Neb., who was working at the Democratic National Committee in 2016, working in the Voter Protection Division. And he was at his favorite bar hangout in Washington late on the evening of July 9, 2016, was walking home to his neighborhood, the Bloomingdale neighborhood, about 30 blocks north of the Capitol, and was shot and killed in what police quickly concluded was most likely a botched robbery.

There had been a series of armed robberies in the neighborhood where Seth was killed in the weeks before his death, seven in the six weeks running up to that, had been an issue in the neighborhood. Neighbors had been complaining about the lack of police presence during this time.

And within a few days of his death, a conspiracy theory started to pop up on obscure websites and Internet chatrooms suggesting somehow that his death was related to his job at the Democratic National Committee. And one of the original proponents of this was one Roger Stone, who a few weeks after Seth Rich's death, tweeted a picture of him describing him as another dead body in the Clintons' wake.

DAVIES: I want to get into these conspiracy theories as they unfolded. But first, I mean, you know, one of the things that inspired conjecture initially was the fact that the police thought it was a botched robbery, and yet his wallet, cellphone, other valuables were not taken. What did detectives make of that?

ISIKOFF: Correct. That was what gave a little bit of traction to the conspiracy theory. Why was nothing taken? And we talked to police officers, prosecutors, people who have handled and seen this sort of thing before. And what they say is that this - what happened with him is consistent with something that happens often when the victim of a crime resists.

And what we do know is that Seth Rich did resist when two assailants accosted him about 4:19 a.m. on Sunday morning July 10. He had bruises on his face. He had bruises on his knuckles indicating that he had put up a fight. And what the police concluded here was that this was most likely a case of, when he resisted, his assailants panicked, shot him and fled without taking the wallet and other items that he had on him.

DAVIES: Right, which is not uncommon in these circumstances. You know, he was shot in the back twice.

ISIKOFF: Correct.

DAVIES: If this were a contract killing, do detectives think that's what we would have seen?

ISIKOFF: This had none of the hallmarks of a contract kill. If, in fact, this was - the assailants were there to assassinate Seth Rich, for one thing, they would have shot him in the head, not in the body. He was still alive, and he was left when the assailant fled. He stayed alive for about an hour and a half. He was taken to the hospital and died later that morning.

So one of the people we interview in "Conspiracyland" is Deborah Sines, who was the assistant U.S. attorney in charge of the investigation to Seth Rich's death. She was a veteran homicide prosecutor in Washington. She'd done a lot of contract killings - prosecuted them, put the perpetrators in prison. And she said this was not a case at all of a contract kill. Homicide 101 - when it's a targeted killing, it's almost always a head shot, and they don't leave you alive
 

Forum List

Back
Top