Fake Wisconsin electors admit Biden won and face punishment

1754 WIS JI-CRIMINAL 1754 1754 FALSE SWEARING

View attachment 869265
Wisconsin State Law Library (.gov)
https://wilawlibrary.gov › jury › files › criminal
False swearing, as defined in § 946.32(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who under (oath) (affirmation) makes or subscribes a false ...



943.39 Fraudulent writings. :: 2012 Wisconsin Statutes & ...

View attachment 869263
Justia Law
https://law.justia.com › chapter-943 › section-943
943.39(3) (3) Makes a false written statement with knowledge that it is false and with intent that it shall ultimately appear to have been signed under oath.

If you sign a document, attesting you are an elector, and you are NOT, that's a crime.

View attachment 869323

View attachment 869324
Numbnuts you know that has nothing to do with fake electors. Just leftists taking a law and trying to rewrite its usage.
 
Yes, there is you fucking moron.

1754 WIS JI-CRIMINAL 1754 1754 FALSE SWEARING

View attachment 869265
Wisconsin State Law Library (.gov)
https://wilawlibrary.gov › jury › files › criminal
False swearing, as defined in § 946.32(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin, is committed by one who under (oath) (affirmation) makes or subscribes a false ...



943.39 Fraudulent writings. :: 2012 Wisconsin Statutes & ...

View attachment 869263
Justia Law
https://law.justia.com › chapter-943 › section-943
943.39(3) (3) Makes a false written statement with knowledge that it is false and with intent that it shall ultimately appear to have been signed under oath.

That Trump U. "law school" correspondence school let you down again
Nothing about fake electors
Show the statute that makes fake electors illegal.
 
In other words you made shit up.
The fake electors made shit up and tried to defraud the government and the people of Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Stat. § 946.69 prohibits falsely assuming to act as a public officer or employee or a utility employee. As relevant, it provides that: “Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony: (a) Assumes to act in an official capacity or to perform an official function, knowing that he or she is not the public officer or public employee or the employee of a utility that he or she assumes to be.” Wis. Stat. § 946.69(2).

 
The fake electors made shit up and tried to defraud the government and the people of Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Stat. § 946.69 prohibits falsely assuming to act as a public officer or employee or a utility employee. As relevant, it provides that: “Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony: (a) Assumes to act in an official capacity or to perform an official function, knowing that he or she is not the public officer or public employee or the employee of a utility that he or she assumes to be.” Wis. Stat. § 946.69(2).

It wasn't illegal in 1876
It wasn't illegal in 1960
And no remedy has been created to prevent it.
Try again
 
It wasn't illegal in 1876
It wasn't illegal in 1960
And no remedy has been created to prevent it.
Try again
The law I cited makes it illegal for people to attempt to exercise power of a public office when they don't hold that office.

The fake electors claimed to be electors (which is a public office) and attempted to exercise the power of that office (by voting in the election for Trump).

Seems like this law makes their actions illegal.

Can you explain how this law doesn't apply?
 
The law I cited makes it illegal for people to attempt to exercise power of a public office when they don't hold that office.

The fake electors claimed to be electors (which is a public office) and attempted to exercise the power of that office (by voting in the election for Trump).

Seems like this law makes their actions illegal.

Can you explain how this law doesn't apply?
Show the statute that makes fake electors illegal.
It wasn't illegal in 1876
It wasn't illegal in 1960.
No remedy was created to prevent it
 
Show the statute that makes fake electors illegal.
It wasn't illegal in 1876
It wasn't illegal in 1960.
No remedy was created to prevent it
I did and I explained how it applies.

Can you explain why it doesn’t apply?
 
Independentthinker

No you didn't moron
It wasn't illegal in 1876
Yes, it was.

A Historical Perspective on Alternate Electors​

1701957143758.png
Just Security
https://www.justsecurity.org › a-historical-perspective-...

Jul 7, 2022 — ... votes in the 1876 election as “Certificate No. 2” from ... The argument is that these submissions were false, fake, fraudulent, or counterfeit ...



In 1876, South Carolina was one of three southern states that quickly became disputed after the popular vote had been cast in November. Florida and Louisiana were the other two. The Republican candidate, Rutherford Hayes, needed all three of these states for an Electoral College victory, whereas Samuel Tilden needed just one.

Tilden’s position was strongest in Florida. In fact, an honest count of ballots cast would have shown Tilden the state’s winner.
His party’s slate of electors in Florida also met on the congressionally designated day for all electors in every state to cast their Electoral College votes.
But unlike in South Carolina, as we shall focus on momentarily, Tilden’s Florida electors were backed by an official of the state’s government: Florida’s Attorney General, a Democrat, who purported to certify Tilden the winner of the state.

On the same day, however, Republican electors in Florida voted for Hayes, backed by a certification from the state’s canvassing board that Hayes had won the state (as a consequence of the board’s dishonest counting of that Hayes had won the state (as a consequence of the board’s dishonest counting of the ballots).
Later, Florida’s judiciary and legislature would act to undo the canvassing board’s certification in favor of Hayes, and additional official documentation of Tilden’s popular vote victory in the state would be sent to Congress to supplement the Attorney General’s initial declaration of this result.

The fake electors certified by the canvassing board was dismissed.

it wasn't illegal in 1960 and no remedy has been created to prevent it.
As usual, you're FOS.

See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false ...​

1701957616223.png
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2022/02/07 › 1960...

Feb 7, 2022 — Instead, the Hawaii Democrats used virtually the same language that the false Trump electors in five states used in their effort to upend the ...

By December 1960, it was clear Kennedy had won. Only Hawaii’s result remained in doubt. Nixon had prevailed by just 140 votes, according to the initial results, which were certified by the governor. A recount was underway on Dec. 19, 1960, when presidential electors across the nation were required by law to meet and cast their ballots.


Nixon’s Hawaii electors met and cast their three votes in an official ceremony. But nearby, Kennedy’s three elector nominees gathered and signed their own certificates, delivering them to Washington as though Kennedy had won the state.
The Hawaii episode has become an important flashpoint as prosecutors scrutinize whether the pro-Trump electors broke any laws.
 
What law or statute makes it a crime?
What law or statute makes a faker elector a crime?
Cultist cite the law
Poor poster 'bigreb' believes he really has the trump card with his repeated....'gimme a law, gimme a statute'.
OK, he can be who he is.
(But a clue for him: USMB ain't a law library. Why would he think it is? Duh?)

But for the wider universe, let's say.....like the fraudulent electors themselves well, they are pretty sure that the authorities have found some goshdarn law somehow someway that is gonna pinch a bit.

Now at least three states have indicted and arrested about 30 or so fraudulent electors, and it looks like Arizona* is gonna add about 10 more next week.
And what these frauds will be actually charged with, well, that depends on the particulars of each jurisdiction.

In just Michigan the State AG has arrested 16, and charge each of them with:

"Each defendant has been charged with:

  • One count of Conspiracy to Commit Forgery, a 14-year felony,
  • Two counts of Forgery, a 14-year felony,
  • One count of Conspiracy to Commit Uttering and Publishing, a 14-year felony,
  • One count of Uttering and Publishing, a 14-year felony,
  • One count of Conspiracy to Commit Election Law Forgery, a 5-year felony, and,
  • Two counts of Election Law Forgery, a 5-year felony."

Personally, I don't think those 30+ frauds are thinking that BigReb has created a Get-Outta-Jail card for the multitude of charges they face for their attempts to cheat America of a fair and honest election.



*It's gonna be a fraught day in Arizona this coming Monday, Dec. 10th.... as the now notorious Kenneth Cheseboro, (indicted and plead guilty in Georgia) is flying to Arizona to give testimony on the national scheme for organizing the frauds as electors.
That cannot be good if you are an election EC fraudster there.
IMHO
--------------------------------------------------
 
Poor poster 'bigreb' believes he really has the trump card with his repeated....'gimme a law, gimme a statute'.
OK, he can be who he is.
(But a clue for him: USMB ain't a law library. Why would he think it is? Duh?)

But for the wider universe, let's say.....like the fraudulent electors themselves well, they are pretty sure that the authorities have found some goshdarn law somehow someway that is gonna pinch a bit.

Now at least three states have indicted and arrested about 30 or so fraudulent electors, and it looks like Arizona* is gonna add about 10 more next week.
And what these frauds will be actually charged with, well, that depends on the particulars of each jurisdiction.

In just Michigan the State AG has arrested 16, and charge each of them with:

"Each defendant has been charged with:

  • One count of Conspiracy to Commit Forgery, a 14-year felony,
  • Two counts of Forgery, a 14-year felony,
  • One count of Conspiracy to Commit Uttering and Publishing, a 14-year felony,
  • One count of Uttering and Publishing, a 14-year felony,
  • One count of Conspiracy to Commit Election Law Forgery, a 5-year felony, and,
  • Two counts of Election Law Forgery, a 5-year felony."

Personally, I don't think those 30+ frauds are thinking that BigReb has created a Get-Outta-Jail card for the multitude of charges they face for their attempts to cheat America of a fair and honest election.



*It's gonna be a fraught day in Arizona this coming Monday, Dec. 10th.... as the now notorious Kenneth Cheseboro, (indicted and plead guilty in Georgia) is flying to Arizona to give testimony on the national scheme for organizing the frauds as electors.
That cannot be good if you are an election EC fraudster there.
IMHO
--------------------------------------------------
Legalized struggle sessions.
 
A city that's 96% commiecrat, the trial is a foregone conclusion,
Ummm, that is such an intelligent, insightful, and original racist remark that I am surprised the good poster OKTexas still continues to use it.

Use it despite how it makes his avatar look.

Well, it is America. We are a big tent. And we can accommodate many styles of fringie KKK-QAnon nutsocrazos.

IMHO
 

Forum List

Back
Top