Fake News, Voter Fraud, hanging chads, fixed outcome ...

Do you support universal suffrage for all US Citizens?

  • Yes, and The Congress needs to set the standard for an ID

    Votes: 10 83.3%
  • No, only property owners should vote

    Votes: 2 16.7%

  • Total voters
    12

Wry Catcher

Diamond Member
Aug 3, 2009
51,322
6,469
1,860
San Francisco Bay Area
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?
 
Last edited:
Depends what you want more: to keep complaining about "so and so interfered in our banana republic elections" or to have fair elections where US citizens only are electing their government and President providing their legal IDs for voting. Something tells me I know what you and your liberal buddies will choose.

upload_2018-8-2_13-26-40.png
 
Last edited:
We can't help it if you people are too stupid to vote.
Hanging chads? can't you punch a card? is that too tough?
and Russia, what did they do to sway the election? Expose the democrats and their racism, anti semitism and misogyny? And the fact the democrats actually RIGGED an election.

People in the DNC should be in jail.....
 
What is a citizen to do?

Show 'em your fucking driver's license and vote. If you don't drive get one of the free ID cards that are provided by EVERY STATE that has attempted to implement a Voter ID law.

Asshole.

"Voter suppression" my ass. Fraud prevention.
 
Why the hell would the requirement of a photo I.D., which is basic to life in the 21st century, suppress voter turnout? Wouldn't you think that even the crazy angry left would want to keep Russians, non-citizens, dead people and illegal aliens from voting? That's what a photo I.D. is about. Is the left going to revert to the old plantation mentality and insult an entire race by claiming that Black people aren't capable of functioning in the 21st century without help from the democrat party?
 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?




How do you suppress a vote by requiring a photo ID? That has never been satisfactorily explained. The Supreme Court did not decide the election between gore and bush, as has been repeatedly reported, numerous news groups did their own recounts and found that bush legitimately won by around 250 votes. That is KNOWN! Why do you insist on perpetuating that particular lie?
 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?
Who doesn’t have a photo ID?

Bring them forth so we can openly stare and laugh at them.
 
Depends what you want more: to keep complaining about "so and so interfered in our banana republic elections" or to have fair elections where US citizens only are electing their government and President providing their legal IDs for voting. Something tells me I know what you and your liberal buddies will choose.

View attachment 208146

Wrong. What I do know and you cannot honestly refute is that states run by Republican's seek to suppress the vote of likely Democratic Voters.
 
We can't help it if you people are too stupid to vote.
Hanging chads? can't you punch a card? is that too tough?
and Russia, what did they do to sway the election? Expose the democrats and their racism, anti semitism and misogyny? And the fact the democrats actually RIGGED an election.

People in the DNC should be in jail.....

upload_2018-8-2_13-49-52.png


upload_2018-8-2_13-49-27.png
 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?
Who doesn’t have a photo ID?

Bring them forth so we can openly stare and laugh at them.

Many college students have a photo ID, but some states choose to deny them the right to vote. In CA the DMV provides both a Driver's License and an ID card; I suspect the Congress would find both acceptable since the DMV requires the following:

To apply for your Class C driver's license in California:

Ace Your Exam on the First Try!

Don't leave your permit test to chance—take our free permit practice test with questions directly from the CA driver handbook. It's the fastest, easiest way to set yourself up for success!

  • Make an appointment with your local DMV for the vision and written exams.
    • NOTE: No tests are administered after 30 minutes before closing.
  • Complete the Driver License or Identification Card Application.
    • This form isn't available online. You can pick one up at the DMV or call the DMV's Automated Telephone Service at (800) 777-0133 to have one mailed to you.
  • Provide proof of your Social Security number*, such as your:
    • Social Security card.
    • Military ID card.
  • Provide proof of your full and true name. The CA DMV provides a list of documents, including documents that show:
  • Provide 1 document (original or certified) that proves your birth date and legal presence from the state's list of documents, which includes:
  • Present 1 document proving your California residency from the DMV's list of approved documentation, which includes:
    • Mortgage bill.
    • Utility bills.
    • Rental or lease agreement signed by your landlord.
  • Have your thumbprint taken.
  • Have your photo taken.
  • Pass the vision exam.
  • Pay the $35 fee.
  • Pass the written permit test.
NOTE: If you’re applying for a REAL ID, the CA DMV still requires 1 document proving each requirement (your identity, SSN, and California residency). Refer to the state’s list of acceptable documents for a REAL ID.
 
Depends what you want more: to keep complaining about "so and so interfered in our banana republic elections" or to have fair elections where US citizens only are electing their government and President providing their legal IDs for voting. Something tells me I know what you and your liberal buddies will choose.

View attachment 208146

Wrong. What I do know and you cannot honestly refute is that states run by Republican's seek to suppress the vote of likely Democratic Voters.






That is an opinion shared only by open borders extremists. The claim that photo ID suppresses the vote is ludicrous. Old people already HAVE photo ID, and those who live in the inner city have no problem obtaining them. The claim that it disenfranchises blacks is a lie that requires people to believe that black people are too stupid to figure out how to use modern technology. That is an absurd, offensive, and racist claim that you people make in an effort to enshrine voting by the illegals, the multi State voting groups, and of course that well known Democrat voting bloc, the dead.
 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?




How do you suppress a vote by requiring a photo ID? That has never been satisfactorily explained. The Supreme Court did not decide the election between gore and bush, as has been repeatedly reported, numerous news groups did their own recounts and found that bush legitimately won by around 250 votes. That is KNOWN! Why do you insist on perpetuating that particular lie?


Wry is not lying.
Why don't you educate yourself?


1. New Restrictive Voting Laws for 2016
Election 2016: Restrictive Voting Laws by the Numbers



2. NAACP files suit, alleges voter suppression
The NAACP filed a federal lawsuit this week, allegedly that thousands of voters are being illegally removed from the rolls.
Author: WCNC Staff
Published: 11:05 PM EDT November 1, 2016
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- The U.S. Department of Justice reportedly filed a statement of interest late Monday night supporting the North Carolina NAACP's federal lawsuit, alleging that thousands of voters are being illegally removed from the polls.

"
The purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the U.S. Department of Justice's statement said.
NAACP files suit, alleges voter suppression


3. African American early voting is way down in North Carolina. Why is that?

4. Map: Areas hardest hit by slim polling options





 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?
Who doesn’t have a photo ID?

Bring them forth so we can openly stare and laugh at them.

Many college students have a photo ID, but some states choose to deny them the right to vote. In CA the DMV provides both a Driver's License and an ID card; I suspect the Congress would find both acceptable since the DMV requires the following:

To apply for your Class C driver's license in California:

Ace Your Exam on the First Try!

Don't leave your permit test to chance—take our free permit practice test with questions directly from the CA driver handbook. It's the fastest, easiest way to set yourself up for success!

  • Make an appointment with your local DMV for the vision and written exams.
    • NOTE: No tests are administered after 30 minutes before closing.
  • Complete the Driver License or Identification Card Application.
    • This form isn't available online. You can pick one up at the DMV or call the DMV's Automated Telephone Service at (800) 777-0133 to have one mailed to you.
  • Provide proof of your Social Security number*, such as your:
    • Social Security card.
    • Military ID card.
  • Provide proof of your full and true name. The CA DMV provides a list of documents, including documents that show:
  • Provide 1 document (original or certified) that proves your birth date and legal presence from the state's list of documents, which includes:
  • Present 1 document proving your California residency from the DMV's list of approved documentation, which includes:
    • Mortgage bill.
    • Utility bills.
    • Rental or lease agreement signed by your landlord.
  • Have your thumbprint taken.
  • Have your photo taken.
  • Pass the vision exam.
  • Pay the $35 fee.
  • Pass the written permit test.
NOTE: If you’re applying for a REAL ID, the CA DMV still requires 1 document proving each requirement (your identity, SSN, and California residency). Refer to the state’s list of acceptable documents for a REAL ID.
What kind of Beta pansy waits until 18 to get a drivers permit?
 
not a word about ID's when Trump ran for election -

the GOP is struggling for excuses - if they get their ass kicked in November all you'll hear is VOTER FRAUD for the next decade.

heres a novel concept ...

Fuk em and feed em fish heads ...
 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?




How do you suppress a vote by requiring a photo ID? That has never been satisfactorily explained. The Supreme Court did not decide the election between gore and bush, as has been repeatedly reported, numerous news groups did their own recounts and found that bush legitimately won by around 250 votes. That is KNOWN! Why do you insist on perpetuating that particular lie?


1. New Restrictive Voting Laws for 2016
Election 2016: Restrictive Voting Laws by the Numbers



2. NAACP files suit, alleges voter suppression
The NAACP filed a federal lawsuit this week, allegedly that thousands of voters are being illegally removed from the rolls.
Author: WCNC Staff
Published: 11:05 PM EDT November 1, 2016
Updated: 10:48 AM EDT November 2, 2016
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- The U.S. Department of Justice reportedly filed a statement of interest late Monday night supporting the North Carolina NAACP's federal lawsuit, alleging that thousands of voters are being illegally removed from the polls.

"
The purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the U.S. Department of Justice's statement said.
NAACP files suit, alleges voter suppression


3. African American early voting is way down in North Carolina. Why is that?

4. Map: Areas hardest hit by slim polling options




I was waiting for it, thank you.

The inevitable blacks are too stupid to get a photo ID excuse.
 
and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.

What's a citizen to do?

It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.

Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.

If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?




How do you suppress a vote by requiring a photo ID? That has never been satisfactorily explained. The Supreme Court did not decide the election between gore and bush, as has been repeatedly reported, numerous news groups did their own recounts and found that bush legitimately won by around 250 votes. That is KNOWN! Why do you insist on perpetuating that particular lie?


1. New Restrictive Voting Laws for 2016
Election 2016: Restrictive Voting Laws by the Numbers



2. NAACP files suit, alleges voter suppression
The NAACP filed a federal lawsuit this week, allegedly that thousands of voters are being illegally removed from the rolls.
Author: WCNC Staff
Published: 11:05 PM EDT November 1, 2016
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- The U.S. Department of Justice reportedly filed a statement of interest late Monday night supporting the North Carolina NAACP's federal lawsuit, alleging that thousands of voters are being illegally removed from the polls.

"
The purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the U.S. Department of Justice's statement said.
NAACP files suit, alleges voter suppression


3. African American early voting is way down in North Carolina. Why is that?

4. Map: Areas hardest hit by slim polling options










Provably false, but enjoy your racism.

 

Forum List

Back
Top