Fact-checking recent claims about climate change

Discussion in 'Politics' started by hazlnut, May 30, 2014.

  1. hazlnut
    Offline

    hazlnut Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    5,934
    Thanks Received:
    854
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +971
    Fact-checking recent claims about climate change


    For ignorant Tea Brains.


    Related rulings:
    Mostly False
    Surface temperatures on Earth "have stabilized."
    Marco Rubio, Tuesday, May 20th, 2014.

    Ruling: Mostly False

    Mostly True
    Cap and trade legislation "was originally a Republican idea."
    Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Tuesday, May 13th, 2014.

    Ruling: Mostly True | Details

    Mostly True
    "Virtually no Republican" in Washington accepts climate change science.
    Jerry Brown, Sunday, May 18th, 2014.

    Ruling: Mostly True | Details

    False
    Human activity is not "causing these dramatic changes to our climate."
    Marco Rubio, Sunday, May 11th, 2014.

    Ruling: False | Details

    Half-True
    Americans "bought into climate change" in 2004-06, but then most "began wandering away from this issue."
    Joe Scarborough, Monday, May 12th, 2014.

    Ruling: Half-True | Details

    True
    The National Science Foundation awarded $700,000 to fund a climate change musical.
    Lamar Smith, Wednesday, March 26th, 2014.

    Ruling: True | Details

    Mostly False
    Earth "has not warmed for the last 17 years."
    Patrick Moore, Tuesday, March 11th, 2014.

    Ruling: Mostly False | Details

    Mostly True
    In a poll, "53 percent of young Republican voters . . . under age 35 said that they would describe a climate [change] denier as 'ignorant,' 'out of touch' or 'crazy.'"
    Sheldon Whitehouse, Wednesday, November 13th, 2013.

    Ruling: Mostly True | Details

    Mostly True
    Sen. Marco Rubio "refuses to accept the basic science" on climate change and is "a climate change denier."
    Organizing for Action, Friday, August 9th, 2013.

    Ruling: Mostly True | Details

    True
    In South Florida, "we've had nine inches of sea-level rise since the 1920s."
    Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Friday, June 28th, 2013.

    Ruling: True | Details

    Mostly False
    "This president spends 30 times as much money on global warming research as he does on weather forecasting and warning."
    Jim Bridenstine, Tuesday, June 11th, 2013.

    Ruling: Mostly False | Details
     
  2. ClosedCaption
    Online

    ClosedCaption Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    20,124
    Thanks Received:
    1,654
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,048
    Human activity is not "causing these dramatic changes to our climate."

    FALSE

    Yeah well, who is that guy some sort of scientist or something? /sarcasm
     
  3. bripat9643
    Online

    bripat9643 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    30,958
    Thanks Received:
    2,484
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,043
    Politifact is a biased leftwing propaganda hack site:

    Ruling: 100% true.

    It's funded by the St. Petersburg Times, a notorious left wing paper.

    You can find massive documentation of its bias at www.politifactbias.com




     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: May 30, 2014
  4. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    9,875
    Thanks Received:
    995
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,130

    The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
    Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

    when "The number of [Siberian] stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present only four (4) stations, those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.
    IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…
    The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass.
    TRUE...
     
  5. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    9,875
    Thanks Received:
    995
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,130
    Feds close 600 weather stations amid criticism they're situated to report warming thanks to temperature readings from sweltering parking lots, airports and other locations that distort the true state of the climate.
    Indeed, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has closed some 600 out of nearly 9,000 weather stations over the past two years that it has deemed problematic or unnecessary, after a long campaign by one critic highlighting the problem of using unreliable data.
    The agency says the closures will help improve gathering of weather data, but critics like meterologist and blogger Anthony Watts say it is too little, too late.
    Distorted data? Feds close 600 weather stations amid criticism they're situated to report warming | Fox News

    TRUE!
     
  6. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    9,875
    Thanks Received:
    995
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,130
    Before satellites the over 11,000 weather stations around the world measuring land, air and sea temperatures, as well as satellites, ships and aircraft that also take measurements temperature readings were done by humans looking at themometers that used mercury levels to determine the temperatures. These readings had variations due to human errors.
    https://www.wmo.int/pages/themes/climate/climate_observation_networks_systems.php
    TRUE...
    Satellite readings didn't become available till the 60s.
     
  7. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    23,298
    Thanks Received:
    3,627
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +3,912
    What's amusing is it is based on a SINGLE tide gauge. Cherry picked data of the first order.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    9,875
    Thanks Received:
    995
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,130
  9. HelenaHandbag
    Offline

    HelenaHandbag Shoots back

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    3,241
    Thanks Received:
    1,126
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Ratings:
    +1,126
    Speaking of cherry picking, how many trees did Michael Mann chop down?
     
  10. Freewill
    Offline

    Freewill Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    11,936
    Thanks Received:
    1,339
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,661
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nq4Bc2WCsdE]The Global Warming Hoax Explained for Dummies - YouTube[/ame]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2

Share This Page