Facebook yanks page of 12-year-old conservative who said Obama doesn't love U.S

[MisterBeale]

Google it.

People who do not wish to suffer from cognitive dissonance will do no such thing.

Facebook conspiracy: Data mining for the CIA
Facebook conspiracy Data mining for the CIA - Canada Canada Internet Examiner.com

"We all know that “he who pays the check, calls the shots,” therefore; whoever controls the purse strings controls the whole project. When it had less than a million or so participants, Facebook demonstrated the potential to do even more than IAO, TIA and TIPS combined. Facebook really exploded after its second round of funding—$12.7 million from the venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager, James Breyer, was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital front established by the CIA in 1999. In-Q-Tel is the same outfit that funds Google and other technological powerhouses. One of its specialties is “data mining technologies.”



Dr. Anita Jones, who joined the firm, also came from Gilman Louie and served on In-Q-Tel’s board. She had been director of Defense Research and Engineering for the U.S. Department of Defense. This link goes full circle because she was also an adviser to the secretary of defense, overseeing DARPA, which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.



But as bad as the beginning of Facebook is, the parallels between the CIA’s backing of Google’s dream of becoming “the mind of God,” and the CIA’s funding of Facebook’s goal of knowing everything about everybody is anything but benign.


Furthermore, the CIA uses a Facebook group to recruit staff for its National Clandestine Service. Check it out if you dare. "

So some conspiracy nut hack says there's a conspiracy, and that makes it so.

Conspiracy nuts are nutty.

​

Ah, living in your world of cognitive bias must be a fairy tale land of well delineated "good guys" and "bad guys." How nice that must be.

If you do not like to read the evidence, I cannot help you. You asked for the link, it was supplied. Here is another. You can READ FACEBOOKS OWN PRIVACY POLICY.
With friends like these ...
With friends like these ... Tom Hodgkinson on the politics of the people behind Facebook Technology The Guardian

Facebook's privacy policy
Just for fun, try substituting the words 'Big Brother' whenever you read the word 'Facebook'

6 The CIA may look at the stuff when they feel like it

"By using Facebook, you are consenting to have your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States ... We may be required to disclose user information pursuant to lawful requests, such as subpoenas or court orders, or in compliance with applicable laws. We do not reveal information until we have a good faith belief that an information request by law enforcement or private litigants meets applicable legal standards. Additionally, we may share account or other information when we believe it is necessary to comply with law, to protect our interests or property, to prevent fraud or other illegal activity perpetrated through the Facebook service or using the Facebook name, or to prevent imminent bodily harm. This may include sharing information with other companies, lawyers, agents or government agencies."

 

[Billy000]

Lol if this story is true then, yes, that is bullshit Fb would do that, but the fact that you cons feel the need to throw a huge tantrum over it is kind of pathetic.

Seriously? Is it that big of deal? It's not like the government did this. It's a private company on a single person.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Yeah, and we all know why they want him censored. That is the point.

Oh? Why is that?

It doesn't matter. It is a private business not a constitutional issue.

Even in private businesses folks have Constitutional rights. Know of any businesses that beat and rape their patrons as a matter of policy?

Especially, since that business is predicated on expression and people posting their opinions. That, is what Facebook essentially is.

All of a sudden a person (whose color does not match the democrat manipulative narrative) makes political speech that is offensive to the Marxists/socialists(who we refer to as liberals, but are in fact not liberals at all) it is taken down. Justified because the speech is made by someone "underage?"

If I scan Facebook, there is no one on there making video comments that are under 18? Oh, there are?

The left wingers get their way again, and they know it. Congrats to them. Just live with the fact that everything we say about you is 100% true. Including the fact that they are all pieces of shit. Especially that.

There are tens of thousands of conservatives on Facebook. You're retarded and should quit making a fool of yourself;

just because other retards here at USMB will cheer you on for what you post doesn't make you any less a retard - it simply confirms it.

"Retard" is one of the most offensive terms anyone can use. Why would you use that term? You want to trash or smear your opponent in a debate because you have nothing of substance nor do you have the ability to refute, go ahead call him names. But, why "retard"?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Oh? Why is that?

It doesn't matter. It is a private business not a constitutional issue.

Even in private businesses folks have Constitutional rights. Know of any businesses that beat and rape their patrons as a matter of policy?

Especially, since that business is predicated on expression and people posting their opinions. That, is what Facebook essentially is.

All of a sudden a person (whose color does not match the democrat manipulative narrative) makes political speech that is offensive to the Marxists/socialists(who we refer to as liberals, but are in fact not liberals at all) it is taken down. Justified because the speech is made by someone "underage?"

If I scan Facebook, there is no one on there making video comments that are under 18? Oh, there are?

The left wingers get their way again, and they know it. Congrats to them. Just live with the fact that everything we say about you is 100% true. Including the fact that they are all pieces of shit. Especially that.

There are tens of thousands of conservatives on Facebook. You're retarded and should quit making a fool of yourself;

just because other retards here at USMB will cheer you on for what you post doesn't make you any less a retard - it simply confirms it.

"Retard" is one of the most offensive terms anyone can use. Why would you use that term? You want to trash or smear your opponent in a debate because you have nothing of substance nor do you have the ability to refute, go ahead call him names. But, why "retard"?

It's always amazing how they never see their own bigotry.

 

[MisterBeale]

It doesn't matter. It is a private business not a constitutional issue.

Even in private businesses folks have Constitutional rights. Know of any businesses that beat and rape their patrons as a matter of policy?

Especially, since that business is predicated on expression and people posting their opinions. That, is what Facebook essentially is.

All of a sudden a person (whose color does not match the democrat manipulative narrative) makes political speech that is offensive to the Marxists/socialists(who we refer to as liberals, but are in fact not liberals at all) it is taken down. Justified because the speech is made by someone "underage?"

If I scan Facebook, there is no one on there making video comments that are under 18? Oh, there are?

The left wingers get their way again, and they know it. Congrats to them. Just live with the fact that everything we say about you is 100% true. Including the fact that they are all pieces of shit. Especially that.

There are tens of thousands of conservatives on Facebook. You're retarded and should quit making a fool of yourself;

just because other retards here at USMB will cheer you on for what you post doesn't make you any less a retard - it simply confirms it.

"Retard" is one of the most offensive terms anyone can use. Why would you use that term? You want to trash or smear your opponent in a debate because you have nothing of substance nor do you have the ability to refute, go ahead call him names. But, why "retard"?

It's always amazing how they never see their own bigotry.

All sorts of insensitive non-PC words are not allowed on this site, but a word disparaging the most helpless, defenseless and kindest folks among us is allowed? And hateful posters use it as a derogatory word? Apparently NYcarbineer doesn't care about those members that may have friends and/or relatives that actually have a mental handicap. Perhaps he has never had the opportunity to know the joy and cheer such wonderful folk can bring to your life.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Even in private businesses folks have Constitutional rights. Know of any businesses that beat and rape their patrons as a matter of policy?

Especially, since that business is predicated on expression and people posting their opinions. That, is what Facebook essentially is.

All of a sudden a person (whose color does not match the democrat manipulative narrative) makes political speech that is offensive to the Marxists/socialists(who we refer to as liberals, but are in fact not liberals at all) it is taken down. Justified because the speech is made by someone "underage?"

If I scan Facebook, there is no one on there making video comments that are under 18? Oh, there are?

The left wingers get their way again, and they know it. Congrats to them. Just live with the fact that everything we say about you is 100% true. Including the fact that they are all pieces of shit. Especially that.

There are tens of thousands of conservatives on Facebook. You're retarded and should quit making a fool of yourself;

just because other retards here at USMB will cheer you on for what you post doesn't make you any less a retard - it simply confirms it.

"Retard" is one of the most offensive terms anyone can use. Why would you use that term? You want to trash or smear your opponent in a debate because you have nothing of substance nor do you have the ability to refute, go ahead call him names. But, why "retard"?

It's always amazing how they never see their own bigotry.

All sorts of insensitive non-PC words are not allowed on this site, but a word disparaging the most helpless, defenseless and kindest folks among us is allowed? And hateful posters use it as a derogatory word? Apparently NYcarbineer doesn't care about those members that may have friends and/or relatives that actually have a mental handicap. Perhaps he has never had the opportunity to know the joy and cheer such wonderful folk can bring to your life.

I have a high functioning autistic son. I use a lot of derogatory words but I'm learning not to. For instance, my oldest son got in trouble for saying "faggot" a word I've used frequently on this site to describe a certain kind of gay people. He didn't hear it from me but from school. He's eleven, the autistic boy is six, just to clarify. I found I cannot tell him not to use that word if I keep using it myself, so I won't use it anymore on this site. So I'm learning too, but have to be snotty to NYcarbineer.....just because.

 

[rightwinger]

Cue Conservative outrage......

Facebook itself provided the answer to why CJ Pearson's account was suspended: at 12 years old, the boy did not meet Facebook's terms and conditions which require all users to be 13 or older. Once Pearson drew attention to himself, it was clear his account was in violation of Facebook's stated rules and it was suspended.


Read more at snopes.com After This Bright Kid Attacked Barack Obama Facebook Did THIS to Him

 

[NYcarbineer]

'You have to be 13 to have a Facebook account. This is a requirement, not a suggestion. He was locked out because he lied about his age, not because of the content,' replied a Facebook representative.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2977943/Facebook-removes-12-year-old-black-middle-school-pupils-account-video-criticizing-Obama.html#ixzz3TQI9V0N6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

As usual, those of us who pointed out the above were right, you RWnuts were wrong.

Now, you can entertain us with a couple hundred posts refusing to admit you were wrong in the face of irrefutable fact.

 

[rightwinger]

Give it a day or so and they will be back with threads showing their outrage because Facebook doesn't allow 12 year olds

 

[Faun]

'You have to be 13 to have Facebook account. This is a requirement, not a suggestion. He was locked out because he lied about his age, not because of the content,' replied a Facebook representative.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2977943/Facebook-removes-12-year-old-black-middle-school-pupils-account-video-criticizing-Obama.html#ixzz3TQI9V0N6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

As usual, those of us who pointed out the above were right, you RWnuts were wrong.

Now, you can entertain us with a couple hundred posts refusing to admit you were wrong in the face of irrefutable fact.

They were made aware of this since the second page of this thread. They will continue denying reality because they can't allow pesky facts to interfere with a good rant.

 

[reconmark]

12 is too young to be a "conservative" or a "liberal" for that matter. He was simply parroting an adult in his life.

Regarding the OP, I doubt if it we have heard the full story.

His next post will be him reciting "Polly want a cracker!!!!"

 

[NYcarbineer]

'You have to be 13 to have Facebook account. This is a requirement, not a suggestion. He was locked out because he lied about his age, not because of the content,' replied a Facebook representative.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2977943/Facebook-removes-12-year-old-black-middle-school-pupils-account-video-criticizing-Obama.html#ixzz3TQI9V0N6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

As usual, those of us who pointed out the above were right, you RWnuts were wrong.

Now, you can entertain us with a couple hundred posts refusing to admit you were wrong in the face of irrefutable fact.

They were made aware of this since the second page of this thread. They will continue denying reality because they can't allow pesky facts to interfere with a good rant.

Always remember...

Proving RWnuts wrong is the cake. Enjoying their demonstrations of their inability to admit they were wrong is the icing.

 

[bodecea]

Cue Conservative outrage......

Facebook itself provided the answer to why CJ Pearson's account was suspended: at 12 years old, the boy did not meet Facebook's terms and conditions which require all users to be 13 or older. Once Pearson drew attention to himself, it was clear his account was in violation of Facebook's stated rules and it was suspended.


Read more at snopes.com After This Bright Kid Attacked Barack Obama Facebook Did THIS to Him

But he should be allowed to break the rules.................because......................

 

[NYcarbineer]

So a black kid who lied about the circumstances of his BIRTH is suddenly the Right's greatest hero?

...how ironic.

 

[JFK_USA]

This is scary that facebook silences freedom of speech. I know that fascist in the democratic party certainly don't want anyone speaking up against them.

Freedom of speech only applies to the government, not private businesses like Facebook.

 

[paulitician]

Google it.

People who do not wish to suffer from cognitive dissonance will do no such thing.

Facebook conspiracy: Data mining for the CIA
Facebook conspiracy Data mining for the CIA - Canada Canada Internet Examiner.com

"We all know that “he who pays the check, calls the shots,” therefore; whoever controls the purse strings controls the whole project. When it had less than a million or so participants, Facebook demonstrated the potential to do even more than IAO, TIA and TIPS combined. Facebook really exploded after its second round of funding—$12.7 million from the venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager, James Breyer, was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital front established by the CIA in 1999. In-Q-Tel is the same outfit that funds Google and other technological powerhouses. One of its specialties is “data mining technologies.”



Dr. Anita Jones, who joined the firm, also came from Gilman Louie and served on In-Q-Tel’s board. She had been director of Defense Research and Engineering for the U.S. Department of Defense. This link goes full circle because she was also an adviser to the secretary of defense, overseeing DARPA, which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.



But as bad as the beginning of Facebook is, the parallels between the CIA’s backing of Google’s dream of becoming “the mind of God,” and the CIA’s funding of Facebook’s goal of knowing everything about everybody is anything but benign.


Furthermore, the CIA uses a Facebook group to recruit staff for its National Clandestine Service. Check it out if you dare. "

Those who don't use Google should have the legal right to opt out on their home being photographed and location made available to anyone. It's wrong what they've been allowed to do. They are violating Citizens' rights. Being a Corporation doesn't excuse or justify it.

If you choose to use Google and Facebook, you have to accept the fact they own you in various ways. So that's up to the individual to make their own call on that. But those who don't use Facebook and Google should not be forced to accept having their privacy invaded. There has to be recourse for the People. And that isn't happening at this point.

 

[paulitician]

Google it.

People who do not wish to suffer from cognitive dissonance will do no such thing.

Facebook conspiracy: Data mining for the CIA
Facebook conspiracy Data mining for the CIA - Canada Canada Internet Examiner.com

"We all know that “he who pays the check, calls the shots,” therefore; whoever controls the purse strings controls the whole project. When it had less than a million or so participants, Facebook demonstrated the potential to do even more than IAO, TIA and TIPS combined. Facebook really exploded after its second round of funding—$12.7 million from the venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager, James Breyer, was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital front established by the CIA in 1999. In-Q-Tel is the same outfit that funds Google and other technological powerhouses. One of its specialties is “data mining technologies.”



Dr. Anita Jones, who joined the firm, also came from Gilman Louie and served on In-Q-Tel’s board. She had been director of Defense Research and Engineering for the U.S. Department of Defense. This link goes full circle because she was also an adviser to the secretary of defense, overseeing DARPA, which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.



But as bad as the beginning of Facebook is, the parallels between the CIA’s backing of Google’s dream of becoming “the mind of God,” and the CIA’s funding of Facebook’s goal of knowing everything about everybody is anything but benign.


Furthermore, the CIA uses a Facebook group to recruit staff for its National Clandestine Service. Check it out if you dare. "

So some conspiracy nut hack says there's a conspiracy, and that makes it so.

Conspiracy nuts are nutty.

It's likely true. Google and Facebook are part of the Government. They've merged into one entity at this point. They should be held to the same standards as our Government, in regards to Civil Liberties. Right now they're being allowed to be exempt because they're 'Private Businesses' whose users interact with them voluntarily. But of course that's not really the case.

Both Google and Facebook have signed agreements with the NSA. And even those who choose not to use Google, are having their privacy invaded. Their homes are being photographed and locations made available to anyone without their consent. That's just wrong. Google has to be confronted at some point.

 

[MisterBeale]

Google it.

People who do not wish to suffer from cognitive dissonance will do no such thing.

Facebook conspiracy: Data mining for the CIA
Facebook conspiracy Data mining for the CIA - Canada Canada Internet Examiner.com

"We all know that “he who pays the check, calls the shots,” therefore; whoever controls the purse strings controls the whole project. When it had less than a million or so participants, Facebook demonstrated the potential to do even more than IAO, TIA and TIPS combined. Facebook really exploded after its second round of funding—$12.7 million from the venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager, James Breyer, was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital front established by the CIA in 1999. In-Q-Tel is the same outfit that funds Google and other technological powerhouses. One of its specialties is “data mining technologies.”



Dr. Anita Jones, who joined the firm, also came from Gilman Louie and served on In-Q-Tel’s board. She had been director of Defense Research and Engineering for the U.S. Department of Defense. This link goes full circle because she was also an adviser to the secretary of defense, overseeing DARPA, which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.



But as bad as the beginning of Facebook is, the parallels between the CIA’s backing of Google’s dream of becoming “the mind of God,” and the CIA’s funding of Facebook’s goal of knowing everything about everybody is anything but benign.


Furthermore, the CIA uses a Facebook group to recruit staff for its National Clandestine Service. Check it out if you dare. "

So some conspiracy nut hack says there's a conspiracy, and that makes it so.

Conspiracy nuts are nutty.

It's likely true. Google and Facebook are part of the Government. They've merged into one entity at this point. They should be held to the same standards as our Government, in regards to Civil Liberties. Right now they're being allowed to be exempt because they're 'Private Businesses' whose users interact with them voluntarily. But of course that's not really the case.

Both Google and Facebook have signed agreements with the NSA. And even those who choose not to use Google, are having their privacy invaded. Their homes are being photographed and locations made available to anyone without their consent. That's just wrong. Google has to be confronted at some point.

I don't post anything or like anything on my FB account, I use it to track people and access pages only.

I don't like pages either. Nothing is more annoying than FB always telling me that my profile is only 10% complete everyday. lol I think the only thing I have ever posted is the above information. That is how I found it so quickly. But, only the preview was available, the link was dead, so naturally, I had to google the originally article. It didn't surprise me. After FB switched to a new format, they deleted almost all the posts that were similar to the ones I just posted.

The other kind of post I always post, are almost yearly I post the TOS to remind EVERYONE, that the product of FB is the USERS.

Nothing is free, you pay for FB, Google, and the internet with your information. Even on this website, you have to give out information to join. Nothing is ever free.

 

[paulitician]

Google it.

People who do not wish to suffer from cognitive dissonance will do no such thing.

Facebook conspiracy: Data mining for the CIA
Facebook conspiracy Data mining for the CIA - Canada Canada Internet Examiner.com

"We all know that “he who pays the check, calls the shots,” therefore; whoever controls the purse strings controls the whole project. When it had less than a million or so participants, Facebook demonstrated the potential to do even more than IAO, TIA and TIPS combined. Facebook really exploded after its second round of funding—$12.7 million from the venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager, James Breyer, was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital front established by the CIA in 1999. In-Q-Tel is the same outfit that funds Google and other technological powerhouses. One of its specialties is “data mining technologies.”



Dr. Anita Jones, who joined the firm, also came from Gilman Louie and served on In-Q-Tel’s board. She had been director of Defense Research and Engineering for the U.S. Department of Defense. This link goes full circle because she was also an adviser to the secretary of defense, overseeing DARPA, which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.



But as bad as the beginning of Facebook is, the parallels between the CIA’s backing of Google’s dream of becoming “the mind of God,” and the CIA’s funding of Facebook’s goal of knowing everything about everybody is anything but benign.


Furthermore, the CIA uses a Facebook group to recruit staff for its National Clandestine Service. Check it out if you dare. "

So some conspiracy nut hack says there's a conspiracy, and that makes it so.

Conspiracy nuts are nutty.

It's likely true. Google and Facebook are part of the Government. They've merged into one entity at this point. They should be held to the same standards as our Government, in regards to Civil Liberties. Right now they're being allowed to be exempt because they're 'Private Businesses' whose users interact with them voluntarily. But of course that's not really the case.

Both Google and Facebook have signed agreements with the NSA. And even those who choose not to use Google, are having their privacy invaded. Their homes are being photographed and locations made available to anyone without their consent. That's just wrong. Google has to be confronted at some point.

I don't post anything or like anything on my FB account, I use it to track people and access pages only.

I don't like pages either. Nothing is more annoying than FB always telling me that my profile is only 10% complete everyday. lol I think the only thing I have ever posted is the above information. That is how I found it so quickly. But, only the preview was available, the link was dead, so naturally, I had to google the originally article. It didn't surprise me. After FB switched to a new format, they deleted almost all the posts that were similar to the ones I just posted.

The other kind of post I always post, are almost yearly I post the TOS to remind EVERYONE, that the product of FB is the USERS.

Nothing is free, you pay for FB, Google, and the internet with your information. Even on this website, you have to give out information to join. Nothing is ever free.

If you voluntarily sign up and use Facebook and Google, you have to accept the terms. And those terms are, that you've agreed to allow your privacy to be thoroughly invaded by Government/Corporate interests. So that's up to the individual Citizen to make that call. But those who choose not to use Google and Facebook should not have their privacy invaded.

Those non-users should be legally allowed to opt out on things like Google photographing their home and making their location available to anyone. There's just something not right about that. And they've merged with Government at this point. So they should be held to the same standards as our Government. They shouldn't be allowed a free pass on Civil Liberties just because their private businesses. That has to change.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You all might be interested to know that Facebook bans about 800,000 a year for ineligibility.

Apparently only one of them is going on TV to crybaby about it.