Facebook Deletes “Donald Trump is Our President” Facebook Fan Page with 3,276,000 Fans!

It's always fun to watch trump's cultists demonstrate again and again their ignorance of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And they do it so often.


So you agree that Google and Facebook are not entitled to the special, extra-constitutional protection afforded them by the people via Section 230 of the Communications Act, right? If they are not going to abide by the law that provides that protection, then they should be made to sink or swim as a publisher sans that protection in the free market of goods, services and ideas . . . just like Trump and other real civil libertarians believe, as opposed to those affecting an air of ignorantia affectata as they pretend not to understand what the real constitutional concern is; you know, the whole reason that the protection of Section 230 was given in the first place, namely, to protect open and vigorous debate!

Oh, wait!

crickets chirping
 
Historically the left has never been a champion of free speech. On the contrary, the left has always sought to silence speech. That's what they do.

You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So is a bakery.
And they both must follow PA laws.
For example, Facebook cannot kick people out for being gay or black or a certain religion.

PA's public accomodation code is a leftist abomination that routinely violates the inalienable rights of the people, most especially those who reject sexual depravity. What are you babbling about?
 
Last edited:
Historically the left has never been a champion of free speech. On the contrary, the left has always sought to silence speech. That's what they do.

You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So is a bakery.
And they both must follow PA laws.
For example, Facebook cannot kick people out for being gay or black or a certain religion.

PA laws are a leftist abomination that routinely violates the inalienable rights of the people, most especially those who reject sexual depravity. What are you babbling about?
What have you actively done to have the PA laws in your state repealed? It can be done if you make the effort, you know. And whining on social media isn't all that effective.
 
It's always fun to watch trump's cultists demonstrate again and again their ignorance of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And they do it so often.


So you agree that Google and Facebook are not entitled to the special, extra-constitutional protection afforded them by the people via Section 230 of the Communications Act, right? If they are not going to abide by the law that provides that protection, then they should be made to sink or swim as a publisher sans that protection in the free market of goods, services and ideas . . . just like Trump and other real civil libertarians believe, as opposed to those affecting an air of ignorantia affectata as they pretend not to understand what the real constitutional concern is; you know, the whole reason that the protection of Section 230 was given in the first place, namely, to protect open and vigorous debate!

Oh, wait!

crickets chirping
^ :blowup:
 
Historically the left has never been a champion of free speech. On the contrary, the left has always sought to silence speech. That's what they do.

You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So is a bakery.
And they both must follow PA laws.
For example, Facebook cannot kick people out for being gay or black or a certain religion.

PA laws are a leftist abomination that routinely violates the inalienable rights of the people, most especially those who reject sexual depravity. What are you babbling about?
What have you actively done to have the PA laws in your state repealed? It can be done if you make the effort, you know. And whining on social media isn't all that effective.
I don't live in PA, :290968001256257790-final:.
 
You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So is a bakery.
And they both must follow PA laws.
For example, Facebook cannot kick people out for being gay or black or a certain religion.

PA laws are a leftist abomination that routinely violates the inalienable rights of the people, most especially those who reject sexual depravity. What are you babbling about?
What have you actively done to have the PA laws in your state repealed? It can be done if you make the effort, you know. And whining on social media isn't all that effective.
I don't live in PA, :290968001256257790-final:.
Priceless.....you take the time to comment on PA laws without even knowing what they are....PA = Public Accomodation laws......:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Look at YouTube. They are almost exclusively banning and demonotizing right wing content.
YouTube is a private enterprise and can regulate offensive content


except when it violates their own rules and offensive is subjective and in their case its all political based,,
Private enterprise....they make the rules

If conservatives are unable to follow them, it is their problem

So you favor companies being able to fire employees for not following rules, like supporting the wrong political candidate.

The boss is always right
So, you then support a company firing someone because of their sexual orientation.?
 
Historically the left has never been a champion of free speech. On the contrary, the left has always sought to silence speech. That's what they do.

You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So is a bakery.
Unless there is a law

The bakery broke the law
No, they didnt
Business PA law of their state. But I'm guessing you support them doing so, right?
 
Historically the left has never been a champion of free speech. On the contrary, the left has always sought to silence speech. That's what they do.

You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So are phone companies but you do not see AT&T censoring your speech on the phone. Same difference. Can you see phone companies cutting off service to Trump supporters?

my phone calls on AT&T are not public for the whole world to read and as such they do not harm the business model of AT&T.

How exactly does a Trump fan page harm the business model of AT&T

It does not because AT&T does not have fan pages.

you seem very confused about what AT&T does.

Let me ask you this, AT&T owns Direct TV, do they just allow anything and everything to be show on it? Or to they exercise some control?

That example doesnt really work, unless direct tv stops showing movies that are politically charged in one direction or another. They exercise control based on FCC regulations, not political leanings.
 
So is a bakery.
And they both must follow PA laws.
For example, Facebook cannot kick people out for being gay or black or a certain religion.

PA laws are a leftist abomination that routinely violates the inalienable rights of the people, most especially those who reject sexual depravity. What are you babbling about?
What have you actively done to have the PA laws in your state repealed? It can be done if you make the effort, you know. And whining on social media isn't all that effective.
I don't live in PA, :290968001256257790-final:.
Priceless.....you take the time to comment on PA laws without even knowing what they are....PA = Public Accomodation laws......:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

No. You braying jackass. PA is an abbreviation for Pennsylvania. Given the context of the OP and the abbreviation for Pennsylvania it made perfect sense to assume you were talking about the public accommodation code of Pennsylvania, which is known to be especially intrusive, especially since some states have laws requiring social platforms owned by businesses based in their states to follow certain rules regarding both hiring and platform content.
 
Last edited:
I stand by my original point. None of that has anything to do with the First Amendment. The Trumpster claiming it does are dangerously stupid. They need to be stopped.


So you agree that Google and Facebook are not entitled to ...

So you agree it's not a First Amendment issue?

It is a First Amendment issue! How is it not, given the reason for Section 230 in the first place? How is standard political speech offensive or indecent? And why are you avoiding the obvious point of my observation? Google and Facebook should be stripped of the protection. Period. That's the only constitutional remedy if they are not gong to abide by the law affording them the protection. Those demanding they be stripped of that special, extra-constitutional protection, like Trump, understand constitutional law just fine.
 
Historically the left has never been a champion of free speech. On the contrary, the left has always sought to silence speech. That's what they do.

You do realize that Facebook is a private entity and can make their own rules?
So is a bakery.
Unless there is a law

The bakery broke the law
No, they didnt
Business PA law of their state. But I'm guessing you support them doing so, right?
It really doesnt make any sense explaining it. No matter how many times someone says they were exercising a religious belief, the left will never accept it.

The left believes that everyone should accept their ideas, even if it goes against ones personal or religious value system.

However, again, they refused because their religious beliefs made them feel like baking a cake specifically for a same sex wedding was akin to them participating. They did not refuse service, as they stated they would have sold them a cake that was already made, but they would not bake a cake specifically for the ceremony.
 

Forum List

Back
Top