Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I agree, since it was this government who got us into this mess. Of course, I hardly consider 400 dollars a week with no insurance any kind of just compensation.
Cutting off those benefits will cause economic pain tht won't stop at the unemployed.
15,000,000 US households without any money isn't going to do real good things to the economy generally, folks.
Trickle down economics policies don't work, haven't ever worked, nor will it ever work as long as supply is high and demand is low.
We need TRICKLE UP economic policies.
Cutting off those benefits will cause economic pain tht won't stop at the unemployed.
15,000,000 US households without any money isn't going to do real good things to the economy generally, folks.
Trickle down economics policies don't work, haven't ever worked, nor will it ever work as long as supply is high and demand is low.
We need TRICKLE UP economic policies.
Cutting off those benefits will cause economic pain tht won't stop at the unemployed.
15,000,000 US households without any money isn't going to do real good things to the economy generally, folks.
Trickle down economics policies don't work, haven't ever worked, nor will it ever work as long as supply is high and demand is low.
We need TRICKLE UP economic policies.
So with your logic why not just give everyone in America 400$ a week, forever.
That's actually a better solution than extending unemployment benefits.Cutting off those benefits will cause economic pain tht won't stop at the unemployed.
15,000,000 US households without any money isn't going to do real good things to the economy generally, folks.
Trickle down economics policies don't work, haven't ever worked, nor will it ever work as long as supply is high and demand is low.
We need TRICKLE UP economic policies.
So with your logic why not just give everyone in America 400$ a week, forever.
That's not my logic that's you idiotic interpretation of it.
I can't do anything about the fact that you take a proposal, rewrite it, and then demand that I defend your silly interpretation of it.
Here -- let me rewrite the Supply Sider's ideas to give you an idea of just how silly you're being:
Why not give all the money to the rich and let trickle down economic policies solve everything?
Pretty silly, huh?
That's actually a better solution than extending unemployment benefits.So with your logic why not just give everyone in America 400$ a week, forever.
That's not my logic that's you idiotic interpretation of it.
I can't do anything about the fact that you take a proposal, rewrite it, and then demand that I defend your silly interpretation of it.
Here -- let me rewrite the Supply Sider's ideas to give you an idea of just how silly you're being:
Why not give all the money to the rich and let trickle down economic policies solve everything?
Pretty silly, huh?
Yes, they must extend unemployment beyond the nearly 2 years it already runs. Because we don't want people having to go out to look for work during the Xmas season, right? They should be home, enjoying the holidays with lots of presents courtesy of the US taxpayer.
What a 'tard. People need to get off their asses and get a job. If they end up on the street then we can see about doing something. But people are resourceful. They will find something to do.
15,000,000 unemployed.
3,000,000 job openings.
Get it?
Neither one of those numbers is fixed, with new jobs opening all the time.
Geddit??
So on your view maybe we should extend unemployment permanently. Maybe ration jobs like they did in France.
Cutting off those benefits will cause economic pain tht won't stop at the unemployed.
15,000,000 US households without any money isn't going to do real good things to the economy generally, folks.
Trickle down economics policies don't work, haven't ever worked, nor will it ever work as long as supply is high and demand is low.
We need TRICKLE UP economic policies.
So with your logic why not just give everyone in America 400$ a week, forever.
15,000,000 unemployed.
3,000,000 job openings.
Get it?
Neither one of those numbers is fixed, with new jobs opening all the time.
Geddit??
In the short run, they are. The economy can't expand fast enough to absorb the unemployed at rate Americans find acceptable.
So on your view maybe we should extend unemployment permanently. Maybe ration jobs like they did in France.
Federal extensions are part of the public policy. We do it every time unemployment rises to an unacceptable level.
That's actually a better solution than extending unemployment benefits.That's not my logic that's you idiotic interpretation of it.
I can't do anything about the fact that you take a proposal, rewrite it, and then demand that I defend your silly interpretation of it.
Here -- let me rewrite the Supply Sider's ideas to give you an idea of just how silly you're being:
Why not give all the money to the rich and let trickle down economic policies solve everything?
Pretty silly, huh?
We already saw what the rich do with it. Create asset bubbles...or to be more specific...talk a bunch of bullshit to jack the prices of an item up beyond any rational measure of its true worth then leave the little guy to suck up his mess.
Cutting off those benefits will cause economic pain tht won't stop at the unemployed.
15,000,000 US households without any money isn't going to do real good things to the economy generally, folks.
Trickle down economics policies don't work, haven't ever worked, nor will it ever work as long as supply is high and demand is low.
We need TRICKLE UP economic policies.
So with your logic why not just give everyone in America 400$ a week, forever.
That would be a good idea in some circumstances. In fact, we may be approaching it in our economy. Some economists believe we're facing structural unemployment which never will fall. Unless we permanently subsidize some former workers, they will suffer greatly.
That's actually a better solution than extending unemployment benefits.
We already saw what the rich do with it. Create asset bubbles...or to be more specific...talk a bunch of bullshit to jack the prices of an item up beyond any rational measure of its true worth then leave the little guy to suck up his mess.
Yet another economic illiterate joins the board.
Welcome!
We already saw what the rich do with it. Create asset bubbles...or to be more specific...talk a bunch of bullshit to jack the prices of an item up beyond any rational measure of its true worth then leave the little guy to suck up his mess.
Yet another economic illiterate joins the board.
Welcome!
Looks like the truth still holds the bite it ought. Seems the illiterates are the ones who made this hellish mess out of the country these last couple of decades. You know, the ones who consider themselves ( and I use the term loosely ) "the experts".
Yet another economic illiterate joins the board.
Welcome!
Looks like the truth still holds the bite it ought. Seems the illiterates are the ones who made this hellish mess out of the country these last couple of decades. You know, the ones who consider themselves ( and I use the term loosely ) "the experts".
Looks like I misunderstood you. You aren't just economically illiterate but also functionally illiterate and unable to think beyond stock phrases and cliches.
On to iggy you go. Too many of your type to deal with.
In the short run, they are. The economy can't expand fast enough to absorb the unemployed at rate Americans find acceptable.
...
Federal extensions are part of the public policy. We do it every time unemployment rises to an unacceptable level.
And what is government doing for unemployment other than spending us into more debt and getting in the way of business?
