expect Rams to be back in LA next year.

there are severe lease problems between the Rams and the city, and Kroenke recently purchased 60 acres of land near extinct Hollywood Park in Inglewood. Clear thinkers believe he’s going to pull the Rams out of Missouri. The Chargers are well aware of it.

Chargers leaving suddenly a possibility UTSanDiego.com

Clear thinkers believe he’s going to pull the Rams out of Missouri. The Chargers are well aware of it.
 
that UT report not only insinuates interest from the chargers organization,but also potential fo the st......

If a stadium funding measure does make it to the ballot in nov 2016,construction of a new chargers stadium on the ballot,possibly in november 2016

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...ecover-Chargers-Over-San-Diego-Stadium-Fumble

November 2016 is too late for a ballat vote.the Rams are free to move to LA by march 1st 2015.

amen brother.well said.
 
so very true.


Your profile pic says it all. StL loves its Cardinals. Rams attendance is near the bottom. Kroenke is buying up those empty red seats to lift the blackout. Still, nobody cares, not watching. Area TV ratings continue to drop.

There are two sites (Coliseum/Rose Bowl) ready to go for a temp home while a stadium is being built. LOL, meanwhile... nothing, there are NO negotiations! Rams were awarded 700mil from the arbitration yet StL refused to pay. Can't blame them, still owe another 300mil on that obsolete dome. Your city, county, state and its people can't afford to keep paying out the cash.
 
so very true.


Your profile pic says it all. StL loves its Cardinals. Rams attendance is near the bottom. Kroenke is buying up those empty red seats to lift the blackout. Still, nobody cares, not watching. Area TV ratings continue to drop.

There are two sites (Coliseum/Rose Bowl) ready to go for a temp home while a stadium is being built. LOL, meanwhile... nothing, there are NO negotiations! Rams were awarded 700mil from the arbitration yet StL refused to pay. Can't blame them, still owe another 300mil on that obsolete dome. Your city, county, state and its people can't afford to keep paying out the cash.

ALSO very true and well said.

Andrew Francesconi - the NFL has stated both the Coliseum and Rose Bowl aren't viable as PERMANENT sites. As temporary homes for a team while a stadium is being built, both venues are as suitable as the Univerity of Minnesota's is for the Vikings while their new stadium is being built. As a matter of fact, the Rose Bowl and Coliseum have gotten - or are about to in the case of the Coliseum - major upgrades thanks to UCLA and USC. At this point, they're better alternatives than the EJD is.
 
very true.

  • Lets see here, no one in LA really wants the Raider Thugs back, and there is ZERO support in LA to bring the Chargers to LA, so the only real choice is the LA RAMS... Anheuser Bush will be just fine without a team in St Louis. If they had a problem with it they would step up and build them a new place to play there... Just sayin..
 
this says it all as well.

  • There is no real desire in St Louis to make sure that the Rams stay there. There may be a few die-hard fans who still attend games and who haven't been pissed off by the "hands-up" gesture that still support the Rams. But they are now outnumbered by the white cops in St Louis who want the Rams to apologize (never gonna happen my friend), the "former fans" who are now boycotting the team, the businesses that want the Rams and their fans out, and the people that just don't care. The only ones in St Louis that want the Rams to stay are the few fans they have left and the L.A. haters that want them to stay simply because they want to rub L.A.'s nose in it.

    Seriously, that does not add up to a sold-out stadium on a Sunday afternoon, unless the stadium capacity was around 35,000. Now that may work in the Mountain West Conference for a school like Boise State, but it doesn't work in the NFL.

    There are three rules when it comes to real estate and NFL franchises: location, location, location. L.A. has it, St Louis doesn't. St Louis may have 3 million in population from the surrounding county to pull from, however L.A. has 18 million to pull from. When it comes to the NFL, St Louis' time has passed.
 
this guy nailed it why the raiders wont be back in LA.

  1. The only people who want the Raiders in LA are the people who are already Raider fans. The rest of us want the Raiders to stay the hell out of here because of the aforementioned Raider fans. The only thing worse than the reality of having these idiotic criminals here now is the idea of more of them coming here from out of town eight times a year. We don’t want them. And if the Raiders try to move anywhere else they will encounter fierce resistance because no one else wants Raider fans in their town either.
 
  1. It’s amazing to see folks form opinions without any facts. LA had no problem supporting pro football. The Rams left Anaheim for 2 reasons. The owner, Georgia Frontiere was from St. Louis and the city of St. Louis promised her a new stadium with luxury boxes and the ability to sell PSL’s. Anaheim and LA would foot the bill for a new stadium. It all came down to bucks. Manic Al Davis kept threatening to move back to the Bay Area if he did not get a new stadium and the only city willing to pitch in some money was Irwindale and Davis did not want to be there. So out of spite towards the LA Coliseum commission he moved to Oakland in hopes if greener pastures. And to this day the city of LA will not pitch in one penny for a stadium. And that is a smart way of thinking. Finally to the comment that LA is Dodger/Laker/USC/UCLA town, don’t forget that the first pro sports team to ever sell out every game in a season was THE STANLEY CUP CHAMPION L. A. KINGS! LA is now, first and foremost, hockeytown!



 
some of these LA RAIDER trolls always ignore this fact that if davis wouldnt share levi stadium with the niners,why would he move to LA and share with stan kroneke? duh. and like this person said,there is a deal in place in oakland for a new stadium,they are just waiting on ignorant mark t sign. so that poster hit the nail on the head,it IS hilarious that the raiders are still being mentioned.

  1. Utterly hilarious that the Raiders are still in this conversation! There is a brand new built stadium less than 30 miles from Oakland that Davis said no to because he doesn’t want to share! So your telling me that they would play in Dodger Stadium for 4-5yrs and share a stadium with the Rams or ? ! No way! If someone builds them a crib under Davis’s terms then and only then the Raiders will move until then LA is leverage only…. There is a reported deal on the table from Oakland to the Raiders waiting for Davis to sign but as usual Mo like his Daddy is ignoring reality! Don’t buy the hype and BS! If they move the Nocal Nation will throw their gear in the garbage, I will be fan1 to do just that so I dare Davis to move go ahead..but he HS said repeatedly that he won’t share…get over it already!
 
If it doesn't get done,you know whats going to happen,this team will end up going somewhere else...
st louis post bryan burwell on Rams getting new stadium.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top