Speculate that Crick is thinking about the health/medical fields?
Speculate that the EPA has a legitimate use for medical data in protecting the environment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Speculate that Crick is thinking about the health/medical fields?
The lame attempt at an appeal to authority shows your position so weak that it can not survive debate.scientist haven't had to prove their outcomes from research in decades to push agendas.
now they do, and as a leftists, you hate to learn what they are trying to do to you.
On what do you base that idea? For one, there is no such thing as a proof in the natural sciences. There is evidence. So, can you demonstrate for us any science entity: organization, journal, group - that has dropped their criterion for demonstrating evidence of an hypothesis? Because it looks very much as if, like your president, you are just making shit up.
Bravo!
scientist haven't had to prove their outcomes from research in decades to push agendas.
now they do, and as a leftists, you hate to learn what they are trying to do to you.
On what do you base that idea? For one, there is no such thing as a proof in the natural sciences. There is evidence. So, can you demonstrate for us any science entity: organization, journal, group - that has dropped their criterion for demonstrating evidence of an hypothesis? Because it looks very much as if, like your president, you are just making shit up.
Oh! does that mean you now view climate models as lacking evidence for good science research?
Cheers
Speculate that Crick is thinking about the health/medical fields?
Speculate that the EPA has a legitimate use for medical data in protecting the environment.
You really are clue less... names redacted, other identifying items redacted, = no HIPPA violation...Speculate that Crick is thinking about the health/medical fields?
Speculate that the EPA has a legitimate use for medical data in protecting the environment.
scientist haven't had to prove their outcomes from research in decades to push agendas.
now they do, and as a leftists, you hate to learn what they are trying to do to you.
On what do you base that idea? For one, there is no such thing as a proof in the natural sciences. There is evidence. So, can you demonstrate for us any science entity: organization, journal, group - that has dropped their criterion for demonstrating evidence of an hypothesis? Because it looks very much as if, like your president, you are just making shit up.
Oh! does that mean you now view climate models as lacking evidence for good science research?
Cheers
The scientific literature is filled to overflowing with evidence supporting AGW. The amount of evidence supporting your contentions is what is lacking and that in the extreme.
scientist haven't had to prove their outcomes from research in decades to push agendas.
now they do, and as a leftists, you hate to learn what they are trying to do to you.
On what do you base that idea? For one, there is no such thing as a proof in the natural sciences. There is evidence. So, can you demonstrate for us any science entity: organization, journal, group - that has dropped their criterion for demonstrating evidence of an hypothesis? Because it looks very much as if, like your president, you are just making shit up.
Oh! does that mean you now view climate models as lacking evidence for good science research?
Cheers
The scientific literature is filled to overflowing with evidence supporting AGW. The amount of evidence supporting your contentions is what is lacking and that in the extreme.
I made the distinction that all science based programs need to be open and transparent so that they are done in the light of day. they must openly prove their points so others can replicate or refute the junk some call science.The reason the data on which certain scientific findings are based cannot be made public is because it is personal health data and its release is prohibited by HIPAA. So your first demand would have to be that HIPAA be rescinded. Are you up for that?
Any AGW data that involves HIPAA?
The data behind studies which the EPA cannot release - the origin behind this flap - cannot be released because it is personal medical data and is protected by HIPAA.
Speculate that Crick is thinking about the health/medical fields?
Speculate that the EPA has a legitimate use for medical data in protecting the environment.
Why don't you tell us what data the EPA could not reveal.
Yeah. Tell us what data the EPA could not reveal.
From your Fox News example:
"The Obama administration’s EPA had originally justified the ban based on a study by the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health, which said the insecticide was linked to childhood developmental delays."
My charge still stands. The data that could not be revealed was HIPAA protected data.
Try again.