Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I hate to break it to you, Frankie, but the USA's investment in infrastructure also included investing in the industrial aspects of the country.
But you didn't answer my question.
Well your question is idiotic and I was thinking you were going to come back and change it to something less retarded.
We have roads and bridges, we are not unique in that respect. Many other nations alos have these "Roads and bridges" that you Obama and Liz "High Cheekbones" Warren never stop telling us about, yet we have the worlds #1 economy.
Maybe there's some mysterious force at work other than "roads and bridges"?
The countries you've held up for comparative purposes (Mexico, etc.) don't invest in their infrastructure to the extent we do in America.
You are trying to make some point and failing badly.
Which of the countries invest in infrastructure the way we do?Well your question is idiotic and I was thinking you were going to come back and change it to something less retarded.
We have roads and bridges, we are not unique in that respect. Many other nations alos have these "Roads and bridges" that you Obama and Liz "High Cheekbones" Warren never stop telling us about, yet we have the worlds #1 economy.
Maybe there's some mysterious force at work other than "roads and bridges"?
The countries you've held up for comparative purposes (Mexico, etc.) don't invest in their infrastructure to the extent we do in America.
You are trying to make some point and failing badly.
As I pointed out in the OP, "infrastructure" is nothing new or magical. The Roman Aqueducts and the Colosseum are still there 2 whole millennium after they was build, but because Italy has embraced the 100% Guaranteed Fail of Progressive Redistribution as its main economic philosophy, it's headed for oblivion.
Infrastructure =/= Success
Exactly how did US roads and bridges build the first auto?
Who said they did? Do you have a credible Obama quote of such?
Obama is on record saying business owners didn't built it, somebody else did. I don't have a clue who he was talking about, maybe you can shed some light?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-ZO7XOpwa8]Obama 7.13.2012: If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen. - YouTube[/ame]
con·text [kon-tekst] noun
1. the parts of a written or spoken statement that precede or follow a specific word or passage, usually influencing its meaning or effect: You have misinterpreted my remark because you took it out of context.
Context | Define Context at Dictionary.com
LMAO! I guess no one ever invested in Frankie's infrastructure.And yeah, Frank. Karl Benz invented and patent the first combusiton engine usable for an automobile. It wasn't until Ford came along that the task of designing and selling mass automobiles at an affordable price to the public in the US was established.
Also, that Roman bridge you have there is part of an aqueduct.
Google "Hoover dam" then come back when you have even a pinch of a clue to what you are talking about
In the 1920's roads and bridges were ubiquitous. Every country had roads and/or bridges and the vast majority of truly great civilizations had both roads and bridges.
Somehow, and just in the USA, roads and bridges were responsible for the development of the automobile.
Can someone switch on their Obama Context Filter and walk us through how roads and bridges in the USA were responsible for the development of the automobile?
The automobile was invented in Germany.
Um, yeah. OK
And?
Rudolph Diesel and Henry Ford wanted to run their vehicles on hemp oil. What does that have to do with the OP?
Somehow, and just in the USA, roads and bridges were responsible for the development of the automobile.
A rare good post from Frank though a failed "bash the left" attempt.
Henry Ford was one of the pioneers of offering hard working americans an honest job for fair pay. He took the automobile from a luxury that only the very wealthy could afford, to ones that the average american could.During those days it was still dirt roads with horse and buggy still competing with them.
It wasn't until the revolutionary FDR came into office from years of right wing destruction creating the great depression. From there FDR knew what made a great america, the people of this great land. They needed help in which he put the american people to work when they needed it the most to beautify america by create the roads and much of the infrastructure we still enjoy today.
This happens with every single piece of innovation since the beginning of innovation. Same thing happened with horse carts. Same thing happened with silverware. Same thing happened with computers. Same thing happened with refrigerators. Same thing happened with mobile phones. This is how economics work.
Eisenhower is the one who spilled budget money on building highways. FDR did nothing but fucking trap the American public in a never ending debt mountian with his new deal policies that he stacked the supreme court to attain.
FAIL.
A rare good post from Frank though a failed "bash the left" attempt.
Henry Ford was one of the pioneers of offering hard working americans an honest job for fair pay. He took the automobile from a luxury that only the very wealthy could afford, to ones that the average american could.
During those days it was still dirt roads with horse and buggy still competing with them.
It wasn't until the revolutionary FDR came into office from years of right wing destruction creating the great depression. From there FDR knew what made a great america, the people of this great land. They needed help in which he put the american people to work when they needed it the most to beautify america by create the roads and much of the infrastructure we still enjoy today.
A rare good post from Frank though a failed "bash the left" attempt.
Henry Ford was one of the pioneers of offering hard working americans an honest job for fair pay. He took the automobile from a luxury that only the very wealthy could afford, to ones that the average american could.
During those days it was still dirt roads with horse and buggy still competing with them.
It wasn't until the revolutionary FDR came into office from years of right wing destruction creating the great depression. From there FDR knew what made a great america, the people of this great land. They needed help in which he put the american people to work when they needed it the most to beautify america by create the roads and much of the infrastructure we still enjoy today.
- I drive nearly every day on unpaved, dirt paths. It doesn't effect my day in any capacity whether it's dirt or pavement and the idiot liberal has been incapable so far in explaining their obsession with pointing out "roads" as an excuse for their socialism.
- Liberals sound like children with Down Syndrome. "We have woads". Ok? Good. Good. But what does that have to do with a businesses success? "We have woads". Yes, I know we do. But what difference does that make? "We have woads". Look - your defeating yourself here. Since everybody has access to those same roads, wouldn't everybody be successful multi-millionaire business owners if roads had anything to do with anything?!? "We have woads". Ugh!!! Go watch Barney. "Otay.... We have woads".
- Liberals can't even understand that roads are built by local government with local taxes while we're discussing the federal government. Their argument is so weak and pathetic, they can't even make one for the level of government we're discussing.
- Liberals also can't imagine being self-reliant. If government doesn't care for and coddle them like an infant, they fear they would die (and they probably would as lazy as they are). It's beyond their capacity to comprehend us conservatives that are self-reliant and will succeed out of sheer will, regardless of the circumstances. We would never let a little thing like no road stop our prosperity. We'd just drive right over the grass/dirt/rocks/etc. (gasp! imagine that?!?!?)
- Liberals are killing themselves with the dumbest argument ever. If it wasn't for government and roads creating prosperity, how do they explain how we even got there? There were no paved roads in 1776. And there was no government either when we declared our independence from England. And yet all we did was thrive into the most prosperous nation in world history. It was businesses, without roads or government that paid the taxes which built the roads that you know obsess over like children with Down Symmdrome!
I know, I know....... "we have woads". That's all you can say and that is all you will respond with.
And yeah, Frank. Karl Benz invented and patent the first combusiton engine usable for an automobile. It wasn't until Ford came along that the task of designing and selling mass automobiles at an affordable price to the public in the US was established.
Also, that Roman bridge you have there is part of an aqueduct.
A rare good post from Frank though a failed "bash the left" attempt.
Henry Ford was one of the pioneers of offering hard working americans an honest job for fair pay. He took the automobile from a luxury that only the very wealthy could afford, to ones that the average american could.
During those days it was still dirt roads with horse and buggy still competing with them.
It wasn't until the revolutionary FDR came into office from years of right wing destruction creating the great depression. From there FDR knew what made a great america, the people of this great land. They needed help in which he put the american people to work when they needed it the most to beautify america by create the roads and much of the infrastructure we still enjoy today.
- I drive nearly every day on unpaved, dirt paths. It doesn't effect my day in any capacity whether it's dirt or pavement and the idiot liberal has been incapable so far in explaining their obsession with pointing out "roads" as an excuse for their socialism.
- Liberals sound like children with Down Syndrome. "We have woads". Ok? Good. Good. But what does that have to do with a businesses success? "We have woads". Yes, I know we do. But what difference does that make? "We have woads". Look - your defeating yourself here. Since everybody has access to those same roads, wouldn't everybody be successful multi-millionaire business owners if roads had anything to do with anything?!? "We have woads". Ugh!!! Go watch Barney. "Otay.... We have woads".
- Liberals can't even understand that roads are built by local government with local taxes while we're discussing the federal government. Their argument is so weak and pathetic, they can't even make one for the level of government we're discussing.
- Liberals also can't imagine being self-reliant. If government doesn't care for and coddle them like an infant, they fear they would die (and they probably would as lazy as they are). It's beyond their capacity to comprehend us conservatives that are self-reliant and will succeed out of sheer will, regardless of the circumstances. We would never let a little thing like no road stop our prosperity. We'd just drive right over the grass/dirt/rocks/etc. (gasp! imagine that?!?!?)
- Liberals are killing themselves with the dumbest argument ever. If it wasn't for government and roads creating prosperity, how do they explain how we even got there? There were no paved roads in 1776. And there was no government either when we declared our independence from England. And yet all we did was thrive into the most prosperous nation in world history. It was businesses, without roads or government that paid the taxes which built the roads that you know obsess over like children with Down Symmdrome!
I know, I know....... "we have woads". That's all you can say and that is all you will respond with.
^ this is stupidity in attempt to call out stupidity. Congratulations.
I think the point is, infrastructure increases the ability for Customers to patron your Business knuckle-head.
In the 1920's roads and bridges were ubiquitous. Every country had roads and/or bridges and the vast majority of truly great civilizations had both roads and bridges.
Somehow, and just in the USA, roads and bridges were responsible for the development of the automobile.
Can someone switch on their Obama Context Filter and walk us through how roads and bridges in the USA were responsible for the development of the automobile?
Somehow, businesses were "patronized" all through the 1700's and all through the 1800's.... knuckle-head. And you know what? We didn't surrender freedoms to communism/marxism/socialism/fascism back then.
A rare good post from Frank though a failed "bash the left" attempt.
Henry Ford was one of the pioneers of offering hard working americans an honest job for fair pay. He took the automobile from a luxury that only the very wealthy could afford, to ones that the average american could.
During those days it was still dirt roads with horse and buggy still competing with them.
It wasn't until the revolutionary FDR came into office from years of right wing destruction creating the great depression. From there FDR knew what made a great america, the people of this great land. They needed help in which he put the american people to work when they needed it the most to beautify america by create the roads and much of the infrastructure we still enjoy today.
