CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,642
- 71,960
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #81
I hate to break it to you, Frankie, but the USA's investment in infrastructure also included investing in the industrial aspects of the country.
But you didn't answer my question.
Well your question is idiotic and I was thinking you were going to come back and change it to something less retarded.
We have roads and bridges, we are not unique in that respect. Many other nations alos have these "Roads and bridges" that you Obama and Liz "High Cheekbones" Warren never stop telling us about, yet we have the worlds #1 economy.
Maybe there's some mysterious force at work other than "roads and bridges"?
The countries you've held up for comparative purposes (Mexico, etc.) don't invest in their infrastructure to the extent we do in America.
You are trying to make some point and failing badly.
As I pointed out in the OP, "infrastructure" is nothing new or magical. The Roman Aqueducts and the Colosseum are still there 2 whole millennium after they was build, but because Italy has embraced the 100% Guaranteed Fail of Progressive Redistribution as its main economic philosophy, it's headed for oblivion.
Infrastructure =/= Success