Every country had Hillary Clintons e-mail address, except for the USA

[Bassman007]

Clinton subject to hack attempts from China, Korea, Germany - Business Insider

Seriously, if Clintons server was hacked or even tried to be hacked, before this can happen the attacker has to have the address. So it seems that Obamas State Dept was the only inept group that did not have Clintons e-mail address. How can this be? She had to be a spy, covering her tracks very well, and now that she is caught, the results are so embarrassing for the USA that she may be let free to pretend that it didn't happen. She should die as a prisoner at Guantanamo Bay, showering with ISIS members.

 

[gipper]

Maybe....just maybe fifty years from now, Americans will learn what actually happened.

 

[007]

Clinton subject to hack attempts from China, Korea, Germany - Business Insider

Seriously, if Clintons server was hacked or even tried to be hacked, before this can happen the attacker has to have the address. So it seems that Obamas State Dept was the only inept group that did not have Clintons e-mail address. How can this be? She had to be a spy, covering her tracks very well, and now that she is caught, the results are so embarrassing for the USA that she may be let free to pretend that it didn't happen. She should die as a prisoner at Guantanamo Bay, showering with ISIS members.

One could almost get the impression that Hitlery was aiding the kenyan with his "fundamental transformation" of America into a third world shit hole.

 

[CowboyTed]

Clinton subject to hack attempts from China, Korea, Germany - Business Insider

Seriously, if Clintons server was hacked or even tried to be hacked, before this can happen the attacker has to have the address. So it seems that Obamas State Dept was the only inept group that did not have Clintons e-mail address. How can this be? She had to be a spy, covering her tracks very well, and now that she is caught, the results are so embarrassing for the USA that she may be let free to pretend that it didn't happen. She should die as a prisoner at Guantanamo Bay, showering with ISIS members.

It seems that Hillary's was the only server not hacked...

Why aren't you this animated about Powell or the Bush administration doing the same thing.

Sorry but this seems like another Benghazi, a tool to attack Clintons ratings.

 

[bedowin62]

LEAVE IT TO A NUTJOB EX-PAT living in Ireland to defend the indefensible.

 

[Wildman]

Maybe....just maybe fifty years from now, Americans will learn what actually happened.

yaa, like we learned all about the JFK assassination 50 years later, those records were never intended to be shown to us pee-ons.

 

[Valerie]

please don't let the facts get in the way of your dishonest smear agenda...



Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton’s Emails


We’ve put all of the information about Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails here. Just the facts, all in one place.


...

Her usage was widely known to the over 100 State Department and U.S. government colleagues she emailed, consistent with the practice of prior Secretaries of State and permitted at the time.



Was it allowed?

Yes. The laws, regulations, and State Department policy in place during her tenure permitted her to use a non-government email for work.

The 2009 National Archives regulation in place during her tenure required that "agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system." The regulation recognizes the use of non-government email accounts.

As she has stated, Clinton's practice was to email government officials on their ".gov" accounts, so her work emails were immediately captured and preserved. In fact, more than 90% of those emails should have already been captured in the State Department’s email system before she provided them with paper copies.

A Politifact analysis also confirmed that Clinton's practices complied with laws and regulations, including support from the former director of a prominent government accountability organization: "In Clinton's defense, we should note that it was only after Clinton left the State Department, that the National Archives issued a recommendation that government employees should avoid conducting official business on personal emails (though they noted there might be extenuating circumstances such as an emergency that require it). Additionally, in 2014, President Barack Obama signed changes to the Federal Records Act that explicitly said federal officials can only use personal email addresses if they also copy or send the emails to their official account. Because these rules weren't in effect when Clinton was in office, 'she was in compliance with the laws and regulations at the time,' said Gary Bass, founder and former director of OMB Watch, a government accountability organization."


Clinton only used her account for unclassified email. No information in Clinton's emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.


When information is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously unclassified to be upgraded to classified if the State Department or another agency believes its public release could cause potential harm to national security, law enforcement or diplomatic relations.





How did Clinton receive and consume classified information?

The Secretary's office was located in a secure area. Classified information was viewed in hard copy by Clinton while in the office. While on travel, the State Department had rigorous protocols for her and traveling staff to receive and transmit information of all types.

A separate, closed email system was used by the State Department for the purpose of handling classified communications, which was designed to prevent such information from being transmitted anywhere other than within that system.


Is Department of Justice conducting a criminal inquiry into Clinton’s email use?

No. As the Department of Justice and Inspectors General made clear, the IGs made a security referral. This was not criminal in nature as misreported by some in the press. The Department of Justice is now seeking assurances about the storage of materials related to Clinton’s email account.


Again, when information is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously unclassified to be upgraded to classified if the State Department or another agency believes its public release could cause potential harm to national security, law enforcement or diplomatic relations.

Clinton hopes that State and the other agencies involved in the review process will sort out as quickly as possible which emails are appropriate to share with the public, and that the release will be as timely and as transparent as possible.




Even if Clinton's emails had been on a government email address and government device, these questions would be raised prior to public release.


While the State Department's review of her 55,000 emails brought the issue to the Inspectors Generals' attentions, the emails that recently were upgraded to classified prior to public release were on the unclassified .gov email system. They were not on the separate, closed system used by State Department for handling classified communications.




The State Department has and did provide guidance regarding the need to preserve federal records. To address these requirements, it was her practice to email government employees on their ".gov" email address. That way, work emails would be immediately captured and preserved in government record-keeping systems.




More than 90% of her work or potentially work-related emails provided to the Department were already in the State Department's record-keeping system because those e-mails were sent to or received by "state.gov" accounts.






As it was Clinton's practice to email U.S. government officials on their .gov accounts, the overwhelming majority of these emails should have already been preserved in the State Department’s email system.





Did Clinton delete any emails while facing a subpoena?

No. As noted, the emails that Clinton chose not to keep were personal emails—they were not federal records or even work-related—and therefore were not subject to any preservation obligation under the Federal Records Act or any request. Nor would they have been subject to the subpoena—which did not exist at the time—that was issued by the Benghazi Select Committee some three months later.


Why was the State Department given printed copies?

That is the requirement. The instructions regarding electronic mail in the Foreign Affairs Manual (the Department's policy manual) require that "until technology allowing archival capabilities for long-term electronic storage and retrieval of email messages is available and installed, those messages warranting preservation as records (for periods longer than current E-mail systems routinely maintain them) must be printed out and filed with related records." [5 FAM 443.3].


How and who decided what should be provided to the State Department?

The Federal Records Act puts the obligation on the government official to determine what is and is not a federal record. The State Department Foreign Affairs Manual outlines guidance "designed to help employees determine which of their e-mail messages must be preserved as federal records and which may be deleted without further authorization because they are not Federal record materials." [5 FAM 443.1(c)].





What level of encryption was employed? Who was the service provider?

The security and integrity of her family's electronic communications was taken seriously from the onset when it was first set up for President Clinton's team. While the curiosity about the specifics of this set up is understandable, given what people with ill intentions can do with such information in this day and age, there are concerns about broadcasting specific technical details about past and current practices. Suffice it to say, robust protections were put in place and additional upgrades and techniques employed over time as they became available, including consulting and employing third party experts.

Was the server ever hacked?

No, there is no evidence there was ever a breach.

Was there ever an unauthorized intrusion into her email or did anyone else have access to it?

No.

What was done after her email was exposed in February 2013 after the hacker known as "Guccifer" hacked Sid Blumenthal’s account?

While this was not a breach of Clinton's account, because her email address was exposed, steps were taken at that time to ensure the security and integrity of her electronic communications, including changing her email address.

Was the State Department able to respond to requests related to FOIA or Congressional requests before they received printed copies of her work-related emails?

Yes. As the Select Committee has said, the State Department provided the Committee with relevant emails it already had on the state.gov system before the State Department requested any printed copies from former Secretaries, and four months before the State Department received the printed copies.

For example, in the well-publicized hack of Sid Blumenthal's email account, a note he sent Clinton on September 12, 2012, was posted online. At first blush, one might not think this exchange would be captured on the state.gov system. But in fact, Clinton forwarded the email, that very same day, onto the state.gov system. And the email was produced by the State Department to the Select Committee, and acknowledged by the Select Committee, in August 2014.

This example illustrates: 1) when an email from a non-".gov" sender had some connection to work or might add to the understanding of State Department officials, it was Clinton’s practice to forward it to officials at their "state.gov" address; and 2) the State Department was able to search and produce Clinton’s emails when needed long before, and unrelated to, receiving the printed copies as they were already captured on state.gov accounts.



Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton’s Emails

 

[CowboyTed]

LEAVE IT TO A NUTJOB EX-PAT living in Ireland to defend the indefensible.

So you are agreeing that this is just a partisan attack. Thanks

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Maybe....just maybe fifty years from now, Americans will learn what actually happened.

I doubt it.
the left still has been unable to directly link George Bush to the rifle that killed Kennedy, even though they know he did it.

 

[NLT]

please don't let the facts get in the way of your dishonest smear agenda...



Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton’s Emails


We’ve put all of the information about Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails here. Just the facts, all in one place.


...

Her usage was widely known to the over 100 State Department and U.S. government colleagues she emailed, consistent with the practice of prior Secretaries of State and permitted at the time.



Was it allowed?

Yes. The laws, regulations, and State Department policy in place during her tenure permitted her to use a non-government email for work.

The 2009 National Archives regulation in place during her tenure required that "agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system." The regulation recognizes the use of non-government email accounts.

As she has stated, Clinton's practice was to email government officials on their ".gov" accounts, so her work emails were immediately captured and preserved. In fact, more than 90% of those emails should have already been captured in the State Department’s email system before she provided them with paper copies.

A Politifact analysis also confirmed that Clinton's practices complied with laws and regulations, including support from the former director of a prominent government accountability organization: "In Clinton's defense, we should note that it was only after Clinton left the State Department, that the National Archives issued a recommendation that government employees should avoid conducting official business on personal emails (though they noted there might be extenuating circumstances such as an emergency that require it). Additionally, in 2014, President Barack Obama signed changes to the Federal Records Act that explicitly said federal officials can only use personal email addresses if they also copy or send the emails to their official account. Because these rules weren't in effect when Clinton was in office, 'she was in compliance with the laws and regulations at the time,' said Gary Bass, founder and former director of OMB Watch, a government accountability organization."


Clinton only used her account for unclassified email. No information in Clinton's emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.


When information is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously unclassified to be upgraded to classified if the State Department or another agency believes its public release could cause potential harm to national security, law enforcement or diplomatic relations.





How did Clinton receive and consume classified information?

The Secretary's office was located in a secure area. Classified information was viewed in hard copy by Clinton while in the office. While on travel, the State Department had rigorous protocols for her and traveling staff to receive and transmit information of all types.

A separate, closed email system was used by the State Department for the purpose of handling classified communications, which was designed to prevent such information from being transmitted anywhere other than within that system.


Is Department of Justice conducting a criminal inquiry into Clinton’s email use?

No. As the Department of Justice and Inspectors General made clear, the IGs made a security referral. This was not criminal in nature as misreported by some in the press. The Department of Justice is now seeking assurances about the storage of materials related to Clinton’s email account.


Again, when information is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously unclassified to be upgraded to classified if the State Department or another agency believes its public release could cause potential harm to national security, law enforcement or diplomatic relations.

Clinton hopes that State and the other agencies involved in the review process will sort out as quickly as possible which emails are appropriate to share with the public, and that the release will be as timely and as transparent as possible.




Even if Clinton's emails had been on a government email address and government device, these questions would be raised prior to public release.


While the State Department's review of her 55,000 emails brought the issue to the Inspectors Generals' attentions, the emails that recently were upgraded to classified prior to public release were on the unclassified .gov email system. They were not on the separate, closed system used by State Department for handling classified communications.




The State Department has and did provide guidance regarding the need to preserve federal records. To address these requirements, it was her practice to email government employees on their ".gov" email address. That way, work emails would be immediately captured and preserved in government record-keeping systems.




More than 90% of her work or potentially work-related emails provided to the Department were already in the State Department's record-keeping system because those e-mails were sent to or received by "state.gov" accounts.






As it was Clinton's practice to email U.S. government officials on their .gov accounts, the overwhelming majority of these emails should have already been preserved in the State Department’s email system.





Did Clinton delete any emails while facing a subpoena?

No. As noted, the emails that Clinton chose not to keep were personal emails—they were not federal records or even work-related—and therefore were not subject to any preservation obligation under the Federal Records Act or any request. Nor would they have been subject to the subpoena—which did not exist at the time—that was issued by the Benghazi Select Committee some three months later.


Why was the State Department given printed copies?

That is the requirement. The instructions regarding electronic mail in the Foreign Affairs Manual (the Department's policy manual) require that "until technology allowing archival capabilities for long-term electronic storage and retrieval of email messages is available and installed, those messages warranting preservation as records (for periods longer than current E-mail systems routinely maintain them) must be printed out and filed with related records." [5 FAM 443.3].


How and who decided what should be provided to the State Department?

The Federal Records Act puts the obligation on the government official to determine what is and is not a federal record. The State Department Foreign Affairs Manual outlines guidance "designed to help employees determine which of their e-mail messages must be preserved as federal records and which may be deleted without further authorization because they are not Federal record materials." [5 FAM 443.1(c)].





What level of encryption was employed? Who was the service provider?

The security and integrity of her family's electronic communications was taken seriously from the onset when it was first set up for President Clinton's team. While the curiosity about the specifics of this set up is understandable, given what people with ill intentions can do with such information in this day and age, there are concerns about broadcasting specific technical details about past and current practices. Suffice it to say, robust protections were put in place and additional upgrades and techniques employed over time as they became available, including consulting and employing third party experts.

Was the server ever hacked?

No, there is no evidence there was ever a breach.

Was there ever an unauthorized intrusion into her email or did anyone else have access to it?

No.

What was done after her email was exposed in February 2013 after the hacker known as "Guccifer" hacked Sid Blumenthal’s account?

While this was not a breach of Clinton's account, because her email address was exposed, steps were taken at that time to ensure the security and integrity of her electronic communications, including changing her email address.

Was the State Department able to respond to requests related to FOIA or Congressional requests before they received printed copies of her work-related emails?

Yes. As the Select Committee has said, the State Department provided the Committee with relevant emails it already had on the state.gov system before the State Department requested any printed copies from former Secretaries, and four months before the State Department received the printed copies.

For example, in the well-publicized hack of Sid Blumenthal's email account, a note he sent Clinton on September 12, 2012, was posted online. At first blush, one might not think this exchange would be captured on the state.gov system. But in fact, Clinton forwarded the email, that very same day, onto the state.gov system. And the email was produced by the State Department to the Select Committee, and acknowledged by the Select Committee, in August 2014.

This example illustrates: 1) when an email from a non-".gov" sender had some connection to work or might add to the understanding of State Department officials, it was Clinton’s practice to forward it to officials at their "state.gov" address; and 2) the State Department was able to search and produce Clinton’s emails when needed long before, and unrelated to, receiving the printed copies as they were already captured on state.gov accounts.



Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton’s Emails

^^^^^^^^^Links to HILLARYCLINTON. COM

 

[Valerie]

^^^^^^^^^Links to HILLARYCLINTON. COM

you seem kind of hysterical but facts are facts...which facts are you actually disputing with FACTS?

 

[NLT]

^^^^^^^^^Links to HILLARYCLINTON. COM

you seem kind of hysterical but facts are facts...which facts are you actually disputing with FACTS?

none because there are no facts at hildabeast.com

 

[Valerie]

help for the hysterical: conjecture is not FACT



con·jec·ture
kənˈjekCHər/
noun
noun: conjecture; plural noun: conjectures

1. 1.
   an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information.
   "conjectures about the newcomer were many and varied"
   synonyms: speculation, guesswork, surmise, fancy, presumption, assumption, theory, postulation, supposition;More
   inference, (an) extrapolation;
   an estimate;
   informala guesstimate, a shot in the dark, a ballpark figure
   "the information is merely conjecture"
   antonyms: fact
   • an unproven mathematical or scientific theorem.
     "the Goldbach conjecture"
   • (in textual criticism) the suggestion or reconstruction of a reading of a text not present in the original source.

verb
verb: conjecture; 3rd person present: conjectures; past tense: conjectured; past participle: conjectured; gerund or present participle: conjecturing
1.
form an opinion or supposition about (something) on the basis of incomplete information.
"he conjectured the existence of an otherwise unknown feature"
synonyms: guess, speculate, surmise, infer, fancy, imagine, believe, think, suspect, presume, assume, hypothesize, suppose
"I conjectured that the game was over"

 

[The VOR]

help for the hysterical: conjecture is not FACT



con·jec·ture
kənˈjekCHər/
noun
noun: conjecture; plural noun: conjectures

1. 1.
   an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information.
   "conjectures about the newcomer were many and varied"
   synonyms: speculation, guesswork, surmise, fancy, presumption, assumption, theory, postulation, supposition;More
   inference, (an) extrapolation;
   an estimate;
   informala guesstimate, a shot in the dark, a ballpark figure
   "the information is merely conjecture"
   antonyms: fact
   • an unproven mathematical or scientific theorem.
     "the Goldbach conjecture"
   • (in textual criticism) the suggestion or reconstruction of a reading of a text not present in the original source.

verb
verb: conjecture; 3rd person present: conjectures; past tense: conjectured; past participle: conjectured; gerund or present participle: conjecturing
1.
form an opinion or supposition about (something) on the basis of incomplete information.
"he conjectured the existence of an otherwise unknown feature"
synonyms: guess, speculate, surmise, infer, fancy, imagine, believe, think, suspect, presume, assume, hypothesize, suppose
"I conjectured that the game was over"

In nutterville, the word fact is indeed spelled CONjecture.