Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only because of your apparent unfamiliarity with the history of the conflict, especially in reference to the West Bank.Whether you intended to or not, the above is real funny.Horespoo.As I stated before (above) Palestinians are not too far from our own historical stance when we fought King George III for our own independence and, admittedly, willing to employ acts of terrorism against an oppressing regime.
The American colonies rebelled mostly because the King-in-Parliament refused to recognize and protect the rights they enjoyed and English citizens, rights and protections they fully expected to enjoy because there were, in fact, English citizens.
No such parallel can be even remotely drawn with regard to Israel and the ex-Jordanians living in the West Bank..
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaNot many people would (with a straight face) label the European Jews as the rightful inhabitants of Palestine
The West Bank belongs to Israel, fair and square, won from Jordan in a war Israel did not start, and then abandoned by same.
Short of physical force, no one will get Israel to do anything with the West Bank that Israel does not want to do.
You aren't paying attention, and deliberately so.Fine, fine...have it your way.......the conclusion the is, that those poor Israelis have been INVADED by Jordanian ArabsOnly because of your apparent unfamiliarity with the history of the conflict, especially in reference to the West Bank.Whether you intended to or not, the above is real funny.Horespoo.As I stated before (above) Palestinians are not too far from our own historical stance when we fought King George III for our own independence and, admittedly, willing to employ acts of terrorism against an oppressing regime.
The American colonies rebelled mostly because the King-in-Parliament refused to recognize and protect the rights they enjoyed and English citizens, rights and protections they fully expected to enjoy because there were, in fact, English citizens.
No such parallel can be even remotely drawn with regard to Israel and the ex-Jordanians living in the West Bank..
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaNot many people would (with a straight face) label the European Jews as the rightful inhabitants of Palestine
When East Prussia reverts back to Germany, please let me know.The doctrine of conquest and its derivative rules were challenged in the 20th century by the development of the principle that aggressive war is contrary to international law, a view that is expressed in the covenant of the League of Nations, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, the charters and judgments of the international military tribunals created at the end of World War II
When East Prussia reverts back to Germany, please let me know.The doctrine of conquest and its derivative rules were challenged in the 20th century by the development of the principle that aggressive war is contrary to international law, a view that is expressed in the covenant of the League of Nations, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, the charters and judgments of the international military tribunals created at the end of World War II
Until then, your argument hasn't a leg to stand on.
Jordan recognized the facts on the ground and gave up its claim in the West bank in 1988, thereby ending any question regarding the disposition of the West Bank under international law.[In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaAt present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
When East Prussia reverts back to Germany, please let me know.The doctrine of conquest and its derivative rules were challenged in the 20th century by the development of the principle that aggressive war is contrary to international law, a view that is expressed in the covenant of the League of Nations, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, the charters and judgments of the international military tribunals created at the end of World War II
Until then, your argument hasn't a leg to stand on.
At present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
International law and Israeli settlements - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Former eastern territories of Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"I've got the pistol, so I'll keep the pesos, and that seem fair........"
When East Prussia reverts back to Germany, please let me know.The doctrine of conquest and its derivative rules were challenged in the 20th century by the development of the principle that aggressive war is contrary to international law, a view that is expressed in the covenant of the League of Nations, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, the charters and judgments of the international military tribunals created at the end of World War II
Until then, your argument hasn't a leg to stand on.
At present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
International law and Israeli settlements - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Former eastern territories of Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"I've got the pistol, so I'll keep the pesos, and that seem fair........"
THANK YOU, Blindboo...but, unfortunately, there is NO reasoning with these right wingers...
When East Prussia reverts back to Germany, please let me know.The doctrine of conquest and its derivative rules were challenged in the 20th century by the development of the principle that aggressive war is contrary to international law, a view that is expressed in the covenant of the League of Nations, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, the charters and judgments of the international military tribunals created at the end of World War II
Until then, your argument hasn't a leg to stand on.
At present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
International law and Israeli settlements - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Former eastern territories of Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"I've got the pistol, so I'll keep the pesos, and that seem fair........"
THANK YOU, Blindboo...but, unfortunately, there is NO reasoning with these right wingers...
Says he who refuses to understand that Boo's argument was refuted.
When East Prussia reverts back to Germany, please let me know.The doctrine of conquest and its derivative rules were challenged in the 20th century by the development of the principle that aggressive war is contrary to international law, a view that is expressed in the covenant of the League of Nations, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, the charters and judgments of the international military tribunals created at the end of World War II
Until then, your argument hasn't a leg to stand on.
At present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
International law and Israeli settlements - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Former eastern territories of Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"I've got the pistol, so I'll keep the pesos, and that seem fair........"
THANK YOU, Blindboo...but, unfortunately, there is NO reasoning with these right wingers...
Says he who refuses to understand that Boo's argument was refuted.
It was NOT refuted....
Non sequitur logic - Wikipedia the free encyclopediafollowing YOUR logic, Iraq and Afghanistan should be our 51st and 52nd states
QUOTE]
Well, maybe you should ask a grown up to explain it to you.
QUOTE]
Well, maybe you should ask a grown up to explain it to you.
I'd be happy to volunteer, since I can remember that time before the people now known as "Palestinians" were invented.
I would translate your crap as "Stupid, uber-conformist antisemitic boy wants to be just like all the other fashionably antisemitic boys so supports the aims and methods of Arab terrorism. He wouldn't know actual liberalism if it came up and slapped him in his pimply little face, so he supports the tyranny of the racist majority as they persecute a tiny minority. "
If your other half brain were working, you'd know that anti-Semitic would also include the Arabs of that area......
Keep reading and stop watching FOX.
I thought everyone knew this.If your other half brain were working, you'd know that anti-Semitic would also include the Arabs of that area......
Keep reading and stop watching FOX.
No it doesn't, you ignorant little twerp.
The term antisemitic was originally coined by a German hater of Jews named Wilhelm Marr in the 19th century to indicated hatred of Jews, and Jews alone. It has remained quite consistent in its use ever since, despite the attempts of Arab terrorist sympathizers, Neo Nazis and other vermin to change its meaning.
I thought everyone knew this.
Jordan recognized the facts on the ground and gave up its claim in the West bank in 1988, thereby ending any question regarding the disposition of the West Bank under international law.[In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaAt present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
I laugh at you.Jordan's attempted annexation has nothing to do with ultimate disposition of the West Bank.Jordan recognized the facts on the ground and gave up its claim in the West bank in 1988, thereby ending any question regarding the disposition of the West Bank under international law.[In 1990, as part of the reunification of Germany, West Germany recognised the "facts on the ground" and accepted clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line.[2] Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse line as the border was formalised by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty on November 14, 1990.
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaAt present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law. According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.
Clearly, they aren't smarter than a 5th grader.Those whose testicles have yet to descend often don't, by the looks of it.I thought everyone knew this.
Why do you refuse to understand the truth?Jerk offs.....I don't care about the Nazi who popularized the term anti-Semitic....What I am referring to is the very fact that BOTH Jews and Arabs are descendants of the Semitic sect
Says who who knows he cannot defend the premises he laid out in this topic.Now go back to jerking off.
