Estimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming | National Association of Scholars
Sorry if I forget to follow up on USMB.
you mean a rightwingnut group denies climate change?
I'm shocked... shocked i tell ya
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Estimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming | National Association of Scholars
Sorry if I forget to follow up on USMB.
Do you have lab work that tests for temperature changes given changes in CO2?
No? Yeah, I know you don't
Do you have lab work that tests for temperature changes given changes in CO2?
No? Yeah, I know you don't
View attachment 178599
This is still a thing?
Maybe when huge swaths of deniers living in coastal areas are forced to move the supposed debate will stop.
Maybe not. They'll probably call it an act of God. Can't be from anything we've done. It's God.
Do you have lab work that tests for temperature changes given changes in CO2?
No? Yeah, I know you don't
View attachment 178599
They don't deny climate change. They deny man made climate change. Everyone with common sense knows the climate changes. Duh!!Estimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming | National Association of Scholars
Sorry if I forget to follow up on USMB.
you mean a rightwingnut group denies climate change?
I'm shocked... shocked i tell ya
Wherein the most retarded repeatedly demonstrate their retardation.
Climate denier propaganda group publishes a completely unfounded quote by one of its own members, chosen for his denial. In other news, NAMBLA reports that one of its own members told it in an interview that kid sex is fine.Estimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming | National Association of Scholars
Sorry if I forget to follow up on USMB.
Wow a left wing think tank organization.... and you think its credible...National Association of ScholarsEstimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming | National Association of Scholars
Sorry if I forget to follow up on USMB.
Learn more from the Center for Media and Democracy's research on climate change.
The National Association of Scholars (NAS) is a non-profit organization in the United States that opposes multiculturalism and affirmative action and seeks to counter what it considers a "liberal bias" in academia.[1]
In 2010 and 2011, its president was espousing climate contrarianism under the group's auspices, with no evident expertise in the climate science field.[2]
The Association's officers are not answerable to its membership: according to its 2009 IRS Form 990 (Part VI Section A), the Association doesn't have members (line 6), members don't elect the officers (line 7a), and the decisions of the governing body are not subject to members' approval (line 7b).[3] Mid-2000s IRS filings also indicate that the Association was controlled by 0 or 1 person.
The Association's major foundation donor is the Sarah Scaife Foundation. By 2009, the majority of the Association's revenue came from "educational partnerships", the funding for which is winding down. While the NAS continues to describe itself as "an independent membership association of academics..."[4], in late 2009 membership was opened to all.[5]
Anyone interested in a more thorough report on this organization should read the later parts of John Mashey's 34pp "Bottling Nonsense" pdf, in the Resources section below.
National Association of Scholars - SourceWatch
Not a reputable source to go to on scientific issues.
So what you are saying is that all those scientific societies have a membership that have no say in what their policy is on global warming?
Yes, but also invented calculus. See, we dont rely on people or our gut feings, we rely on empirical evidence.
You are aware that your namesake was an Alchemist right? Totally believed in mystical properties and chemistry magic. Kinda figures...
Yes, but also invented calculus. See, we dont rely on people or our gut feings, we rely on empirical evidence.
You are aware that your namesake was an Alchemist right? Totally believed in mystical properties and chemistry magic. Kinda figures...
Yes, but also invented calculus. See, we dont rely on people or our gut feings, we rely on empirical evidence.
You are aware that your namesake was an Alchemist right? Totally believed in mystical properties and chemistry magic. Kinda figures...
You mean you do not vote for the members of your board? And even as an affiliate member I get to vote on what I think the most pressing issues are for the scientific society I belong to.So what you are saying is that all those scientific societies have a membership that have no say in what their policy is on global warming?
Yes I am. Because most of the members of the societies I belong to are more concerned with the insurance and benefits and access to publishing than they are with silly statements from their front offices. And NONE of them ASK for member input or approval on nonsense like that.
Show me where these statements were OPEN to member input ANYWHERE..
You mean you do not vote for the members of your board? And even as an affiliate member I get to vote on what I think the most pressing issues are for the scientific society I belong to.So what you are saying is that all those scientific societies have a membership that have no say in what their policy is on global warming?
Yes I am. Because most of the members of the societies I belong to are more concerned with the insurance and benefits and access to publishing than they are with silly statements from their front offices. And NONE of them ASK for member input or approval on nonsense like that.
Show me where these statements were OPEN to member input ANYWHERE..