Epiphany time.

[MaryL]

Apparently certain groups cherry picked satellite data that measurers ground temperatures. Not air temps, very misleading.

 

[ActionJackson]

They have a goal, and they'll use whatever tactics necessary to achieve it. If that means lying, cheating, fabricating “evidence,” or whatever, it doesn't matter. The end justifies the means.

They want complete control. If that means scaring a gullible, ignorant, and easily frightened “sheeple,” then so be it. They have fearmongering down to a fine art, and the easily duped, general public are more than happy to pay to see it.

 

[Thunk]

Yup. The weather channel displays temps for my area that are 4-12 degrees hotter than what they really are.

That means they'll be coming at us with a glo-BULL-warming push soon (this was the hottest year in all of history).

 

[Concerned American]

Yup. The weather channel displays temps for my area that are 4-12 degrees hotter than what they really are.

That means they'll be coming at us with a glo-BULL-warming push soon (this was the hottest year in all of history).

Yeah, have you noticed the latest panic porn tactic the weather reporters use? They don't report the temperature. They report the "feels like" temperature. LMAO, Feels like---to WHO?

 

[MaryL]

Another Democrat ruse. Democrats are pathological.

 

[1srelluc]

Yep, pave over nearly 600 square miles of desert in AZ and guess what? It's hot.

Next thing you know they will be taking NASCAR track temps for air temps.

 

[rampart]

Apparently certain groups cherry picked satellite data that measurers ground temperatures. Not air temps, very misleading.

as large data bases are assembled, sometimes anomalous formats or extraneous data is encountered.

 

[westwall]

as large data bases are assembled, sometimes anomalous formats or extraneous data is encountered.

No, this is outright fraud.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Apparently certain groups cherry picked satellite data that measurers ground temperatures. Not air temps, very misleading.

When someone has a belief or agenda especially when funding is involved, they're dig out and cherry pick the data to back it up.

 

[luiza]

They have been doing it for decades . A large part of the scam-- started by IPPC with BBC and East Anglia university as chief corrupt parties --- relies on these deceptions . We are currently seeing this non- stop in European news where they are just lying about maximum figures and how long they lasted and how much longer they are forecast to last . BBC leading the way as ever .

 

[Thunk]

They report the "feels like" temperature. LMAO, Feels like---to WHO?

 

[Crick]

View attachment 809433

There's an actual definition to the term, sweety.

 

[Concerned American]

There's an actual definition to the term, sweety.

sweetie

swē′tē

noun​

1. Sweetheart; dear.
2. A person who is much loved.
3. A sweetheart.

 

[Thunk]

A person who is much loved.

Awwww cut it out...y'r makin' me blush

 

[mamooth]

Apparently certain groups cherry picked satellite data that measurers ground temperatures. Not air temps, very misleading.

Um, actually it's only your side that does that. They do it because the satellite data model sucks pretty badly, so it vastly understates the amount of warming. All of the surface temperature sets show strong warming.

I'm guessing you misheard some idiot propaganda from your side, and now you're in a pickle. Your side is required to believe in the bad satellite data, but you've already said it's bad. It will be interesting to see how you solve your problem.

I do understand why all of you act the way you do. All the data says deniers lie about every single thing. Your cult forbids you from admitting that, so you have to all fake really dumb conspiracy fable about how all the data is faked.

It doesn't work. The whole planet correctly classifies you as commie frauds. Especially lately. When you losers start claiming all the data is faked, people now look at you like you've grown a second head. Normal people just don't say the things that you loons say.

 

[ding]

Um, actually it's only your side that does that. They do it because the satellite data model sucks pretty badly, so it vastly understates the amount of warming. All of the surface temperature sets show strong warming.

I'm guessing you misheard some idiot propaganda from your side, and now you're in a pickle. Your side is required to believe in the bad satellite data, but you've already said it's bad. It will be interesting to see how you solve your problem.

I do understand why all of you act the way you do. All the data says deniers lie about every single thing. Your cult forbids you from admitting that, so you have to all fake really dumb conspiracy fable about how all the data is faked.

It doesn't work. The whole planet correctly classifies you as commie frauds. Especially lately. When you losers start claiming all the data is faked, people now look at you like you've grown a second head. Normal people just don't say the things that you loons say.

Given that CO2 emissions have been increasing by 1 billion tons per year per year for over 20 years, I'm pretty sure normal people and the vast majority of the world are ignoring your overly emotional and dramatic claims of imminent climate catastrophe.

 

[MaryL]

Despite the politics, it's possible industrial/man made pollution is a factor. Its also possible that this environmentalism is a political tool china is cynically manipulating to shut down the west.

 

[Crick]

Despite the politics, it's possible industrial/man made pollution is a factor. Its also possible that this environmentalism is a political tool china is cynically manipulating to shut down the west.

Then they aren't doing very well at it.

https://www.scmp.com/economy

https://www.wsj.com/news/economy