Trakar
VIP Member
- Feb 28, 2011
- 1,699
- 73
- 83
- Thread starter
- #81
...It is my understanding that if there is criticism of New Coal Technology, which I am referring to, it is over CO2 Emissions, which I personally do not consider a pollutant. If Clean Coal Technology and Construction is being obstructed for that reason, I find those responsible responsible for the consequences...
So what is your understanding of the nature of previously sequestered CO2 being emitted on large scale into our atmospere? We have geologic, historic and modern evidences of the environmental impact caused by substantively altering the composition of our planet's atmosphere upon existing ecosystems.
Pollution -
The presence in or introduction into the environment of a substance or thing that has harmful or poisonous effects
pollution - Google Search
undesirable state of the natural environment being contaminated with harmful substances as a consequence of human activities.
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Pollution is the introduction of contaminants into a natural environment that causes instability, disorder, harm or discomfort to the ecosystem i.e. physical systems or living organisms. Pollution can take the form of chemical substances or energy, such as noise, heat, or light. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollution
An undesirable change in the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of air, water, soil, or food that can adversely affect the health, survival, or activities of humans or other living organisms.
Florida DEP - TMDL Glossary of Terms
is a special case of habitat destruction; it is chemical destruction rather than the more obvious physical destruction. Pollution occurs in all habitatsland, sea, and fresh waterand in the atmosphere. ...
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/133385/conservation/272
Wow thank you so much for the definitions. I am so totally stupid that I dont know what pollution is.
I beileve that the consequences of carbon dioxide emissions are over stated at best an outright lie at worst.
Well, my question and definitions weren't directed toward you, but rather to an individual who stated that CO2 did not meet their definitions of pollution.
As to your ideological delusions and beliefs regarding CO2, they are largely irrelevent. The science says otherwise, and those are the facts we must deal with.