Emails prove Rush Limbaugh Right on Sequester "pain"

[OriginalShroom]

As done in the past, the republican right is taking things out of context and making it seem like the email came straight from the WH. Not only did it not come from Obama, the email wasn't saying what the OP is claiming.

From the OP's own link...

Late Tuesday evening, the Agriculture Department issued a statement disputing Mr. Brown’s read of the situation. The department said Mr. Brown had suggested dividing his region’s cuts among a number of states but he was told that idea was already part of their sequester plans.

“The APHIS budget officer explained that USDA is already proposing these steps in order to avoid furloughs. USDA is committed to doing all we can to minimize the impact of sequester [for] our employees and the farmers, ranchers, and rural communities we serve,” the department said in its statement.

And just how do you square that with the quote from the original e-mail,

you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be,

??

You can't.

It is just as Obama's Education guy who claimed that pink slips were already going out to teachers and even the Washington Post had to give that 4 Pinnochios.

Obama and his people have been caught lying their asses off about how bad this is going to be and they are ordering their people to make it as bad for the general public as possible.

They can't afford to allow public tours of the White House, but they can afford to pay $277k a year for calligraphy and $400k for Oil paintings of Cabinet people and a million dollars for Obama to go golfing and another half million for Michelle to Vaca somewhere else at the same time.

Just why does DHS need a Billion and half bullets this year?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised

In the internal email..

gee, I wonder how Rush and the Tea Party Lunatic Brigade missed this one:

As the negotiations proceeded, Republicans seemed to think the same thing.

"Boehner told the House Republican leadership and other key members not to worry about the sequester … ‘Guys, this would be devastating to Defense,’ he said. ‘This would be devastating, from their perspective, on their domestic priorities. This is never going to happen,’" Woodward wrote.

PolitiFact | Barack Obama says Congress owns sequestration cuts

and: In the summer of 2011, Obama and Congress were in a high-stakes stand-off over the debt limit. House Republicans insisted on spending cuts before increasing the debt limit. This was a notable change from the past, when members of Congress from both parties would pass debt ceiling increases with relatively little fuss.

---


President Obama signed the bill shortly after it was passed by the Senate. In doing so, the president said, "Is this the deal I would have preferred? No. But this compromise does make a serious down payment on the deficit reduction we need, and gives each party a strong incentive to get a balanced plan done before the end of the year."

 

[edthecynic]

Rush is always right with his assessment of liberals and their true intentions.

Obama wants sequestration to happen, he wants people to "feel the pain", so he can then blame Republicans for it.

Its still amazing how his lapdog liberals cover for him. The Hussein signed his name to sequestration, yet we're supposed to believe he had nothing to do with it.

If so, then how STUPID does that make the GOP for allowing Boner's sequester to happen? Boner went on vacation rather than try to avoid it.

 

[KnobbyWalsh]

Rush is always right with his assessment of liberals and their true intentions.

Obama wants sequestration to happen, he wants people to "feel the pain", so he can then blame Republicans for it.

Its still amazing how his lapdog liberals cover for him. The Hussein signed his name to sequestration, yet we're supposed to believe he had nothing to do with it.

No he's not. Anyone who listens to that phony and takes him seriously is to be pitied.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Rush is always right with his assessment of liberals and their true intentions.

Obama wants sequestration to happen, he wants people to "feel the pain", so he can then blame Republicans for it.

Its still amazing how his lapdog liberals cover for him. The Hussein signed his name to sequestration, yet we're supposed to believe he had nothing to do with it.

If so, then how STUPID does that make the GOP for allowing Boner's sequester to happen? Boner went on vacation rather than try to avoid it.

It is an insane Rush-drug-addled-brain talking point...

but we have reality on our side

"Boehner told the House Republican leadership and other key members not to worry about the sequester … ‘Guys, this would be devastating to Defense,’ he said. ‘This would be devastating, from their perspective, on their domestic priorities. This is never going to happen,’" Woodward wrote.

 

[t_polkow]

IMO this shows evidence of an impeachable offense being commited by Obama. Holding back an aircraft carrier, and directing other cuts to do the most harm in his war on Republicans, to further his desire to have complete dictatorial control by taking back the House in '14.

In a sane world, the media would be all over this, and Benghazi as well, which may be another grounds for impeachment. Where are the young Woodwards of journalism these days? Are they ALL lapdogs for King Barry?

Good luck with impeachment and taking back anything in 2014! Better idea, if you don't like Obama don't vote for him in 2016!!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Rush is always right with his assessment of liberals and their true intentions.

Obama wants sequestration to happen, he wants people to "feel the pain", so he can then blame Republicans for it.

Its still amazing how his lapdog liberals cover for him. The Hussein signed his name to sequestration, yet we're supposed to believe he had nothing to do with it.

No he's not. Anyone who listens to that phony and takes him seriously is to be pitied.

the GOP has been playing games all along since 2008

In the summer of 2011, Obama and Congress were in a high-stakes stand-off over the debt limit. House Republicans insisted on spending cuts before increasing the debt limit. This was a notable change from the past, when members of Congress from both parties would pass debt ceiling increases with relatively little fuss.

but we have reality on our side

"Boehner told the House Republican leadership and other key members not to worry about the sequester … ‘Guys, this would be devastating to Defense,’ he said. ‘This would be devastating, from their perspective, on their domestic priorities. This is never going to happen,’" Woodward wrote.

The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

IMO this shows evidence of an impeachable offense being commited by Obama. Holding back an aircraft carrier, and directing other cuts to do the most harm in his war on Republicans, to further his desire to have complete dictatorial control by taking back the House in '14.

In a sane world, the media would be all over this, and Benghazi as well, which may be another grounds for impeachment. Where are the young Woodwards of journalism these days? Are they ALL lapdogs for King Barry?

Good luck with impeachment and taking back anything in 2014! Better idea, if you don't like Obama don't vote for him in 2016!!

No place like plain sight for hiding the truth, right? At least you admit he has no intention of stepping down in 2016. He doesn't. - Jeremiah

 

[OriginalShroom]

Remember this little ditty?

It sure got a lot of airplay back then by the Liberals. Not so much now.

“The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion dollars for the first 42 presidents -- number 43 added $4 trillion dollars by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back -- $30,000 for every man, woman and child,” Obama said on July 3, 2008, at a campaign event in Fargo, N.D.

“That's irresponsible. It's unpatriotic,”

And what is our National Debt now???

Oh yeah.. $16 Trillion.

 

[t_polkow]

IMO this shows evidence of an impeachable offense being commited by Obama. Holding back an aircraft carrier, and directing other cuts to do the most harm in his war on Republicans, to further his desire to have complete dictatorial control by taking back the House in '14.

In a sane world, the media would be all over this, and Benghazi as well, which may be another grounds for impeachment. Where are the young Woodwards of journalism these days? Are they ALL lapdogs for King Barry?

Good luck with impeachment and taking back anything in 2014! Better idea, if you don't like Obama don't vote for him in 2016!!

No place like plain sight for hiding the truth, right? At least you admit he has no intention of stepping down in 2016. He doesn't. - Jeremiah

Yea ya found out the secret!!!

 

[AmericanFirst]

typical Left Wing Politician...


They don't give a shit about the Country. Only power. I really don't understand how people can support them.

Because the teachers want to keep their power in the Union and they don't do that, unless they teach the children to vote Democrat.

Get out of here welsher. You are even wore than Limbaugh whom is completely full of shit.

The ones full of shit are on the left. Liars one and all.