random3434
Senior Member
- Jun 29, 2008
- 25,899
- 7,791
- 48
Why does Obama have this thing for ugly dykes? Yech. WHo wants to see her fat ugly ass in black robes?
The right wing must be so proud to have you on their side!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why does Obama have this thing for ugly dykes? Yech. WHo wants to see her fat ugly ass in black robes?
I'll give odds that they blindly fall in line.Looks like it's the Harriet "My Little Crony" Meyers redux.
She's much more experienced than Miers (she was Dean of Harvard Law and Solicitor General)... but yeah, compared to the rest of the people he was seriously considering, she's got a practically Miers level of experience (judicially none) and lack of record.
The question now is whether Democrats, who often (appropriately) chide Republicans for being lock-step behind their leaders, will have the integrity and conviction to oppose Kagan's nomination on the same grounds Republicans opposed Miers and force Obama to choose someone qualified and reliably representative of his party's judicial philosophy and Stevens' rulings. If not, they're revealed as huge hypocrites and worse, the court is rendered even less interested in protecting civil rights and Constitutional protections.
Any takers?
What, are you nuts?Me too. One of the reasons Obama has gotten away with supporting practically no progressive policies since taking office is because Democratic voters are still so enamored by his cult of personality they support him no matter how much they ideologically oppose what he does.
What, are you nuts?Me too. One of the reasons Obama has gotten away with supporting practically no progressive policies since taking office is because Democratic voters are still so enamored by his cult of personality they support him no matter how much they ideologically oppose what he does.
All we've got from him since day one has been one "progressive" (read: Fabian socialist) policy position after another.
He moves any farther left and he'll make Castro look like Goldwater.
So Rabbi, how is it living in 1955?
they weren't even like that in 1955 as far as i know.
he can't help being a loser. is what he is.
You're just jealous that Obama didnt nominate you. I guess you aren't enough of a dyke to qualify.
they weren't even like that in 1955 as far as i know.
he can't help being a loser. is what he is.
You're just jealous that Obama didnt nominate you. I guess you aren't enough of a dyke to qualify.
Hey, bro. How are you? Good to see a fellow Jew on my board. Now that the pleasantries are over with... unless you want to find your dick stuck down your nostrils, don't you ever speak to Jillian like that again.
I'm not getting nominated for a political position either.
You were trying to make some kind of point, dumbshit?
Since when does looks matter for a political position?
Yeah, my point is you make snide remarks about the looks of others while hiding behind your computer like the coward you are.
Grow up and man up. You embarrass all real men.
Why does Obama have this thing for ugly dykes? Yech. WHo wants to see her fat ugly ass in black robes?
Why does Obama have this thing for ugly dykes? Yech. WHo wants to see her fat ugly ass in black robes?
two posts. congrats. i thought it would take maybe 5 post before some asshole would attack her looks.
so what? ....your post should have your opinion about the news. Otherwise it's just spam.
Why does Obama have this thing for ugly dykes? Yech. WHo wants to see her fat ugly ass in black robes?
Thanks.
I mean, look at Napolitano. Hillary.
What is it with this guy?
And between you and Mud, I'm sure you two are just male models of the year.
If either of you are as ugly as your personalities, don't even bother posting a picture.
I'm not getting nominated for a political position either.
You were trying to make some kind of point, dumbshit?
really? interesting. perhaps on other boards you've haunted. not here.
there is nothing inappropriate or 'spam' about providing information.
or do i have to go through every rightwingnut thread to show you what spam is?
Good for you. I prefer to get my own news. I come here to view other peoples opinion about the news.
Anyway.
Obama declared that there was no litmus test on abortion for a nominee. Did anyone really expect him to nominate someone who wants to overturn Roe? C'mon.
Kagan has a long track record on abortion, if I recall correctly. This will make the nomination very divisive, leading to another knock down drag out Fuck You America show from the Democrats. Way to go!
And between you and Mud, I'm sure you two are just male models of the year.
If either of you are as ugly as your personalities, don't even bother posting a picture.
I'm not getting nominated for a political position either.
You were trying to make some kind of point, dumbshit?
dear God....you and the other men here who can only comment on the nominee's looks are women hating pigs.
Alito's looks ain't that great ya know, but wtf does that have to do with the person's capabilities?
when it is a women nominated or running for office, you dorks comment on looks only...as if women are nothing without good looks....or only can be remarked about, via their looks?
you're sickos, misogynistic below ground worms!!!!!!!!
shame on you!
The difference being you guys have to make shit up.
We don't.