The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Nuclear is relatively safe, and provides a good cost to benefit ratio. Yes, once in a while a plant has an issue, and you have a disaster on your hands. But overall, they are worth it.Add to that the toxic waste dump that are rare earth metal minesIt's not renewable if you are mining the elements and metals like I have shown here. And the Electricity produced to charge these vehicles has to come from Hydrocarbons. No way could we rely on something as undependable as solar or wind.Electric cars are heavily dependent on toxic chemicals to be built. Even something as simple as mining the Copper which electric vehicles have an enormous amount of copper in them, are an environmental nightmare.
Here are copper mines seen from space.
The dirty little secret of "renewable" energy
The entire world will starve or freeze to death if you eliminate hydrocarbons.
We could go 100% nuclear.
This is a bullshit argument. Ummm the downsides of this bad stuff utilized once in building a vehicle vs bad stuff generated every mile they drive,......
And we have enough nuclear material sitting around to power the entire country for a couple centuries or more
The safest energy source are Hydrocarbons. They have the smallest footprint, are most cost effective, and we have the technologies to make it Zero Emissions or near Zero.
And even when there is an issue, it is easily cleaned up. We even have Petroleum Eating Bacteria, as Petroleum is an Organic Compound, and can be digested by such organisms.
Last edited: